Dinçer YILDIZ, Emrah ŞENEL, Sabri DEMİR, Mehmet ZENGİN, Ahmet ERTÜRK, Siyami KARAHAN

Contribution of amniotic membrane to the healing of iatrogenic vas deferens injury

Background/aim: Iatrogenic vas deferens injury is one of the most serious complications of operations in the inguinal region. Vasovasostomy is performed as treatment. However, stenosis is common after vasovasostomy. Oligospermia or azoospermia may develop and result in infertility. This study aimed to investigate the effect of amniotic membrane on healing in vas deferens injuries. Materials and methods: Four groups consisting of 10 rats each were formed. No procedure was performed in Group-I. In GroupII, the left vas deferens was transected and left to spontaneous healing. In Group-III, the left vas deferens was transected, and endto-end anastomosis was performed. In Group-IV, the left vas deferens was transected, end-to-end anastomosis was performed, and it was closed with a wrapping of amniotic membrane on the anastomosis line. Rats were sacrificed after 60 days, and each left vas deferens was evaluated. Lumen patency was checked by passing methylene blue through the vas deferens. Subsequently, the vas deferens was evaluated both macroscopically and histopathologically. Data were evaluated using SPSS version 21.0. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all variables. Results: The anastomosis lines in Group-IV healed better than those in Group-III, and less stenosis was observed. There were differences between the groups in terms of luminal patency (p = 0.009), adhesions to surrounding tissues (p = 0.02) and separation of the ends of the vas deferens (p = 0.03). Conclusion: We observed improvement on luminal patency and histology of rat vas deferens injury after surrounding human amniotic membrane on the transected and repaired surface. Further studies are needed to apply this promising result on human beings.Key words: Amniotic membrane, anastomosis, inguinal hernia, vas deferens, vasovasostomy

PDF

___

1. Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A. Six thousand three hundred sixtyone pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35-year review. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2006; 41 (5): 980-986. doi: 10.1016/j. jpedsurg.2006.01.020
2. Vogels HD, Bruijnen CJ, Beasley SW. Establishing benchmarks for the outcome of herniotomy in children. The British Journal of Surgery 2010; 97 (7): 1135-1139. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7041
3. Tekatli H, Schouten N, Van Dalen T, Burgmans I, Smakman N. Mechanism, assessment, and incidence of male infertility after inguinal hernia surgery: a review of the preclinical and clinical literature. American Journal of Surgery 2012; 204 (4): 503-509. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.03.002
4. Wenner WJ, Jr., Gutenberg M, Crombleholme T, Flickinger C, Bartlett SP. The pathological evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia sac. Journal Pediatric Surgery 1998; 33 (5): 717-718.
5. Matsuda T. Diagnosis and treatment of post-herniorrhaphy vas deferens obstruction. International Journal of Urology: Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association 2000; 7 (Suppl.): S35-S38. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2000.00171.x
6. Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M, Ahmadiani A, Ghanavi J et al. Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. European Cells & Materials 2008; 15: 88-99. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v015a07
7. Jirsova K, Jones GLA. Amniotic membrane in ophthalmology: properties, preparation, storage and indications for grafting-a review. Cell and Tissue Banking 2017; 18 (2): 193-204. doi: 10.1007/s10561-017-9618-5
8. Diaz-Prado S, Muinos-Lopez E, Hermida-Gomez T, Rendal-Vazquez ME, Fuentes-Boquete I et al. Multilineage differentiation potential of cells isolated from the human amniotic membrane. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 2010; 111 (4): 846-857. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22769
9. Farhadihosseinabadi B, Farahani M, Tayebi T, Jafari A, Biniazan F et al. Amniotic membrane and its epithelial and mesenchymal stem cells as an appropriate source for skin tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology 2018; 46 (Suppl. 2): 431- 440. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1458730
10. Kim J, Kang HM, Kim H, Kim MR, Kwon HC et al. Ex vivo characteristics of human amniotic membrane-derived stem cells. Cloning and Stem Cells 2007; 9 (4): 581-594. doi: 10.1089/ clo.2007.0027
11. Ravishanker R, Bath AS, Roy R. “Amnion Bank”--the use of long term glycerol preserved amniotic membranes in the management of superficial and superficial partial thickness burns. Burns 2003; 29 (4): 369-574. doi: 10.1016/s0305- 4179(02)00304-2
12. Gupta A, Kedige SD, Jain K. Amnion and chorion membranes: potential stem cell reservoir with wide applications in periodontics. International Journal of Biomaterials 2015; 2015: 274082. doi: 10.1155/2015/274082
13. Gao S, Ding J, Xiao HJ, Li ZQ, Chen Y et al. Anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effect of combined treatment with methylprednisolone and amniotic membrane mesenchymal stem cells after spinal cord injury in rats. Neurochemical research 2014; 39 (8): 1544-1552. doi: 10.1007/s11064-014-1344-9
14. Serena TE, Yaakov R, Moore S, Cole W, Coe S et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a hypothermically stored amniotic membrane for use in diabetic foot ulcers. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 2020; 9 (1): 23- 24. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0142
15. Fernandes M, Sridhar MS, Sangwan VS, Rao GN. Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Cornea 2005; 24 (6): 643-653. doi: 10.1097/01. ico.0000151501.80952.c5
16. Razzaghi M, Rahavian A, Fallah Karkan M, Allameh F, Ghiasy S, Javanmard B. Use of human amniotic membrane repair of anterior urethral defect: First clinical report. International Journal of Urology: Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association 2020; 27 (7): 605-609. doi: 10.1111/iju.14257
17. Miki T. Stem cell characteristics and the therapeutic potential of amniotic epithelial cells. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 2018; 80 (4): e13003. doi: 10.1111/aji.13003
18. Lefebvre S, Adrian F, Moreau P, Gourand L, Dausset J et al. Modulation of HLA-G expression in human thymic and amniotic epithelial cells. Human Immunology 2000; 61 (11): 1095-1101. doi: 10.1016/s0198-8859(00)00192-0
19. Arrizabalaga JH, Nollert MU. Human amniotic membrane: a versatile scaffold for tissue engineering. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2018; 4 (7): 2226-2236. doi: 10.1021/ acsbiomaterials.8b00015
20. Lim R. Concise review: fetal membranes in regenerative medicine: new tricks from an old dog? Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017; 6 (9): 1767-1776. doi: 10.1002/sctm.16-0447
21. Palanker ND, Lee CT, Weltman RL, Tribble GD, Van der Hoeven R et al. Antimicrobial efficacy assessment of human derived composite amnion-chorion membrane. Scientific Reports 2019; 9 (1): 15600. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52150-4
22. Lichtman MK, Otero-Vinas M, Falanga V. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) isoforms in wound healing and fibrosis. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2016; 24 (2): 215- 222. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12398
23. Penn JW, Grobbelaar AO, Rolfe KJ. The role of the TGFbeta family in wound healing, burns and scarring: a review. International Journal of Burns and Trauma 2012; 2 (1): 18-28.
24. Hortensius RA, Ebens JH, Harley BA. Immunomodulatory effects of amniotic membrane matrix incorporated into collagen scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2016; 104 (6): 1332-1342. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35663
25. Lee SB, Li DQ, Tan DT, Meller DC, Tseng SC. Suppression of TGF-beta signaling in both normal conjunctival fibroblasts and pterygial body fibroblasts by amniotic membrane. Current Eye Research 2000; 20 (4): 325-334.
26. Cavallaro G, Cavallaro E. Vasectomy reversal and spermatic granuloma: experimental investigation. Microsurgery 2003; 23 (5): 437-439. doi: 10.1002/micr.10179
27. Miller C, Kovell RC. Development of a large pelvic sperm granuloma status post radical prostatectomy: a case report. Urology Case Reports 2017; 15: 3-4. doi: 10.1016/j. eucr.2017.07.003