___

• Zentrum fur Turkeistudien, Institut an der Universitat Duisburg-Essen, Turkei-Jahrbuch des Zentrums fur Turkeistudien 2004/2005, LIT Verlag, Munster, Germany, 2004.
• Flam H. Turkey and the EU: politics and economics of accession. CESifo Economic Studies, 2004; 1(50): 171–210 7. Lejour AM, De Mooij RA, Capel CH. Assessing the economic implications of Turkish accession to the EU. The Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis; 004. CPB Document No. 56. http://www.cpb.nl/eng/pub/cpbreeksen/document/56/ doc56.pdf 8. Korkut M, Tüzün B, Korkut S, Çakmak Y. Difficulties faced in forensic medicine procedures in our country and recommended solutions. Klinik Adli Tıp 2001; 1(1): 9–21. (in Turkish)
• Bilgin N, Çekin N, Gülmen MK, Alper B. Retrospective evaluation of age determination cases at Çukurova University Forensic Medicine Department. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2003; 2: 140–4. (in Turkish)
• New Turkish Penal Code, Ed. Yurtcan E. İstanbul Bar Publication, 3 th. Ed. Ufuk Press. İstanbul, 2005. (in Turkish)
• Turkish Civil Code, Ankara Açık Ceza Evi Press, Ankara, 2002. (in Turkish)
• Gök Ş, Erölçer N, Özen C. Age determination in forensic medicine. 2nd ed. İstanbul: Turkish Republic Ministry of Justice, Council of Forensic Medicine Press, 1985. (in Turkish)
• Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1959. 14. Tanner
• JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein NH, Cameron N. Assessment
• of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3
• Method). 3rd ed. London: W.B. Saunders, 2001.
• Büken B, Büken E, Şafak AA, Yazıcı B, Erkol Z, Mayda A. Is the Gök Atlas sufficiently reliable for forensic age determination of Turkish children? Turk J Med Sci 2008; 38(4): 319-27.
• Ashizawa K, Kumakura C, Zhou X, Jin F, Cao J. RUS skeletal maturity of children in Beijing. Ann Hum Biol. 2005; 32: 316– 25.
• Ersoy UO. Cross-sectional study of the evaluation of bone age in the 0–18-year-old population. İstanbul: Turkish Republic Ministry of Justice, Council of Forensic Medicine, 2003. (The thesis of specialist written in Turkish)
• Koç A, Karaoğlanoğlu M, Erdoğan M, Kösecik M, Cesur Y. Assessment of bone ages: is the Greulich- Pyle method sufficient for Turkish boys? Pediatr Int 2001; 43: 662–5.
• Buken B, Safak AA, Yazici B, Buken E, Mayda AS. Is the assessment of bone age by the Greulich-Pyle method reliable at forensic age estimation for Turkish children? Forensic Sci Int 2007; 173: 146–53.
• Vignolo M, Naselli A, Magliano P, Di Battista E, Aicardi M, Aicardi G. Use of the new US90 standards for TW-RUS skeletal maturity scores in Youths from the Italian population. Horm Res 1999; 51: 168–72.
• Beunen G, Lefevre J, Ostyn M, Renson R, Simons J, Van Gerven D. Skeletal maturity in Belgian youths assessed by the Tanner- Whitehouse method (TW2). Ann Hum Biol 1990; 17: 355–76.
• Vignolo M, Milani S, DiBattista E, Naselli A, Mostert M, Aicardi G. Modified Greulich-Pyle, Tanner-Whitehouse, and Roche- Wainer-Thissen (knee) methods for skeletal age assessment in a group of Italian children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 1990; 149: 314–7.
• Lejarraga H, Guimarey A, Orazi V. Skeletal maturity of the hand and wrist of healthy Argentinian children age 4-12 years, assessed by the TWII method. Ann Hum Biol 1997; 24: 257– 61.
• Taranger J, Karlberg J, Bruning B, Engström I. Standard deviation score charts of skeletal maturity and its velocity in Swedish children assessed by the Tanner-Whitehouse method (TW2-20). Ann Hum Biol 1987; 14: 357–65.
• Tanner J, Oshman D, Bahhage F, Healy M. Tanner-Whitehouse bone age reference values for North American children. J Pediatr 1997; 131: 34–40.
• Düzce City Development Project 2004: 95. (in Turkish)
• Neyzi O, Ertuğrul T. Pediatri 1 (Pediatrics 1). İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitapevi Press, 1986; 62–81. (in Turkish)
• Banerjee KK, Agarwal BBL. Estimation of age from epiphyseal union at the wrist and ankle joints in the capital city of India. Forensic Sci Int 1998; 1/2: 30,31–9.
• Groell R, Lindbichler F, Riepl T, Gherra L, Roposch A, Fotter R. The reliability of bone age determination in Central European children using the Greulich and Pyle method. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 461–4.
• Bull RK, Edwards PD, Kemp PM, Fry S, Hughes IA. Bone age assessement: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods. Arch Dis Child 1999; 81: 172–3.
• Molinarin L, Gasser T, Largo RH. TW3 bone age: RUS/CB and gender differences of percentiles for score and score increments. Ann Hum Biol 2004; 31: 421–35.
• Mora S, Boechat MI, Pietka E, Huang HK, Gilsanz V. Skeletal age determinations in children of European and African descent: applicability of the Greulich and Pyle standards. Pediatr Res. 2001; 50: 624–8.
• Haiter-Neto F, Kurita LM, Menezes AV, Casanov MS. Skeletal age assessment: a comparison of 3 methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 435: 15–20.
• Morris LL. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method) [book review]. Australas Radiol 2003; 47: 340–1.