Intrusive Effects of the Connecticut Intrusion Arch and the Utility Intrusion Arch

The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the effects of two different arches, the Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and the Utility Intrusion Arch (UIA). A total of 20 patients (15 girls and 5 boys) having Class I or Class II malocclusions with deep bite were divided into two groups. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before treatment and after intrusion of upper incisors. Statistical evaluation of lateral cephalograms revealed that upper incisors were intruded and protruded, upper first molars were extruded, and lower incisors were protruded in both groups. Due to the extrusion of the molars, anterior and posterior facial heights increased. It was determined that both of the mechanics were effective on intrusion of anterior teeth.

Intrusive Effects of the Connecticut Intrusion Arch and the Utility Intrusion Arch

The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the effects of two different arches, the Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and the Utility Intrusion Arch (UIA). A total of 20 patients (15 girls and 5 boys) having Class I or Class II malocclusions with deep bite were divided into two groups. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before treatment and after intrusion of upper incisors. Statistical evaluation of lateral cephalograms revealed that upper incisors were intruded and protruded, upper first molars were extruded, and lower incisors were protruded in both groups. Due to the extrusion of the molars, anterior and posterior facial heights increased. It was determined that both of the mechanics were effective on intrusion of anterior teeth.

___

  • Schudy FF. The control of vertical overbite in clinical orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 38:19-39, 1968. Hotz R. Orthodontics in daily practice. Bern: Hans Huber; 1974. 3. Otto RL, Anholm JM, Engel GA. A comparative analysis of intrusion of incisor teeth achieved in adults and children according to facial type. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 77:437-446, 1980. 4. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1997. 5. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Ackermann JI, Thomas PM, Tulloch JFC. Contemprorary Orthodontics. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1979.
  • Dake ML, Sinclair PM. A comparison of the Ricketts and Tweed
  • type arch levelling techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 95:72-78, 1989.
  • Poulton DR. Correction of extreme deep overbite with
  • orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
  • Orthop. 96:275-280, 1989. 8.
  • Bell WH, Jacobs JD, Legan H. Treatment of class II deep bite by
  • orthodontic and surgical means. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 85:1-20, 1984. 9.
  • Engel G, Cornforth G, Damerell JM, Gordon J, Levy P, McAlpine
  • J, Otto R, Walters R, Chaconas S. Treatment of deep-bite cases.
  • Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 77:1-13, 1980.
  • Nanda R. Correction of deep overbite in adults. Dent Clin North Am. 41:67-87, 1997.
  • Eberhart BB, Kuftinec MM, Baker IM. The relationship between bite depth and incisor angular change. Angle Orthod. 60:55-58, 1990.
  • Levin RI. Deep bite treatment in relation to mandibular growth rotation. Eur J Orthod. 13:86-94, 1991.
  • Nanda R. The differential diagnosis and treatment of excessive overbite. Dent Clin North Am. 25:69-84, 1981.
  • Lindauer SJ. Orthodontic treatment planning. In: Nanda R, ed. Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1997, pp: 23-49.
  • Janzen EK. Balanced smile- a most important treatment objective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 72:359-372, 1977.
  • Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 53:262-284, 1967.
  • Gianelly AA, Petras JC, Boffa J. Condylar position and Class II deep-bite, no-overjet malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 96:428-432, 1989.
  • Melsen B, Bosch C. Different approaches to anchorage: a survey and an evaluation. Angle Orthod. 67:23-30, 1997.
  • Parker CD, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Skeletal and dental changes associated with the treatment of deep bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 107:382-393, 1995.
  • Begg PR, Kesling PC. Begg orthodontic theory and technique. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1977.
  • Begg PR, Kesling PC. The differential force method of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 71:1-39, 1977.
  • Ricketts RM. Bioprogressive therapy as an answer to orthodontic needs: Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 70:359-397, 1976.
  • Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Gugino CF et al. Bioprogressive Therapy. Book 1. Denver, Colo: Rocky Mountain Orthodontics; 1978.
  • Hellsing E, Eliassons S. Effect of fixed anterior bite plane therapy- a radiographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 110:61- 68, 1996.
  • Braun S, Marcotte MR. Rationale of the segmented approach to orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 108:1- 8, 1995. Burstone CJ. Mechanics of the segmental arch technique. Angle Orthod. 36:99-120, 1966.
  • Burstone CJ. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 72:1-22, 1977.
  • Shroff B, Yoon WM, Lindauer SJ, Burstone CJ. Simultaneous intrusion and retraction using a three-piece base arch. Angle Orthod. 67:455-461, 1997.
  • Barton KA. Overbite changes in the Begg and edgewise techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 62:48-55, 1972.
  • Goerick B, Diedrich P, Wehrbein H. Intrusion of the anterior teeth with the segmented arch technique of Burstone- a clinical study. Fortschr. Kieferorthop. 53:16-25, 1992.
  • Gordon JB. Treatment of deep-bite cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 77:1-13, 1980.
  • Greig DG. Bioprogressive therapy.overbite reduction with the lower utility arch. Br J Orthod. 10:214-216, 1983.
  • Hamdan AM, Rock WP. The effect of archwire forces on incisor intrusion. Br J Orthod. 22:155-160, 1995.
  • Xu TM, Lin JX, Kui H, Huang JF. Bite-opening mechanics as applied in the Begg Technique. Br J Orthod. 21:189-195, 1994.
  • Nanda R, Marzban R, Kuhlberg A. The Connecticut Intrusion. J Clin Orthod. 32:708-715, 1998.
  • Steigman S, Michaeli Y. Experimental intrusion of rat incisors with continuous loads of varying magnitude. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 80:429-436, 1981.
  • Demirhanoglu M. Evaluation of the effects and stability of bite opening mechanics in deep-bite cases treated with edgewise mechanics [PhD thesis]. Ankara: University of Hacettepe; 1990.
  • Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP, Droschl H. Evaluation of continuous arch and segmented arch leveling techniques in adult patients – A clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 110:647-652, 1996.
  • Cakırer B. Comparison of segmented arch technique and Bioprogressive Therapy in the treatment of deep bite [PhD thesis]. Ankara: University of Hacettepe; 1997.
  • McDowell EH, Baker IM. The skeletodental adaptations in deep bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 100:370-375, 1991.
  • DeVincenzo JP, Winn MW. Maxillary incisor intrusion and facial growth. Angle Orthod. 57:279-289, 1987.
  • Cleall JF, BeGole EA. Diagnosis and treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 52:38-60, 1982. Arvystas MG. Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II division 2 malocclusions. Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 97:510-521, 1990. Arvystas MG. Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II division 2 malocclusions. Part 2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 99:74- 84, 1991.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effects of ACE Inhibition and AT1 Receptor Blockade on Cardiac Ischaemia-Reperfusion Induced Mortality and Cardiac Markers in Rats

Ercüment ÖLMEZ, Şemsettin ŞAHİN, Ahmet ACET, Mustafa IRAZ

Effect of Carotid Stenosis on the Development of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Experimental Study

Mehmet BİLİCİ, Zafer OKUMUŞ, Mehmet Dumlu AYDIN, Ednan BAYRAM, Canan ATALAY, Cemal GÜNDOĞDU

Development of ELISA Systems for Measurement of Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-a)

Ayşegül YÜCEL, Cemalettin AYBAY

Intrusive Effects of the Connecticut Intrusion Arch and the Utility Intrusion Arch

Mihri AMASYALI, Erol AKIN, Şeniz KARAÇAY, Hüseyin ÖLMEZ, Deniz SAĞDIÇ

Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Four Dentin Bonding Agents on Gingival Fibroblasts

Arzu ATAY, Toksoy Fulya TOPÇU, Mehmet DALKIZ, Yaşar Meriç TUNCA, Jülide ÖZEN, Ali Uğur URAL

Sjögren's Syndrome: A Study of Salivary Electrophoresis

Mehmet YALTIRIK, Hülya KOÇAK BERBEROĞLU, Kıvanç ERGEN, Barış AYDIL

Sjögren's syndrome: A study of salivary electrophoresis

Kıvanç ERGEN, Barış AYDIL, Mehmet YALTIRIK, Koçak Hülya BERBEROĞLU

Autoımmune Polyglandular Syndrome Type II: A Case Report

Özlem YERSAL, Gülbin SEYMAN, Dilek SOYSAL, Hamide AYDOAN, Serra ŞENTEKİN, Yiğit SÖZEN

Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type II: A case report

Özlem YERSAL, Serra ŞENTEKİN, Yiğit SÖZEN, Gülbin SEYMAN, Hamide AYDOĞAN, Dilek SOYSAL

Development of ELISA systems for measurement of human tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha )

Cemalettin AYBAY, Ayşegül YÜCEL