In vitro susceptibility of seven antifungal agents against dermatophytes isolated in İstanbul

In vitro susceptibility of seven antifungal agents against dermatophytes isolated in İstanbul

Background/aim: Dermatophytes are the causative agents of dermatophytosis, which is a common disease worldwide that affects thehair, skin, and nails. Dermatophytes comprise more than 40 species in 3 genera: Microsporum, Trichophyton, and Epidermaphyton. Inthis study, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of seven antifungal agents: amphotericin B, terbinafine, itraconazole, voriconazole,ketoconazole, miconazole, and fluconazole.Materials and methods: A sensitivity study was performed using a microdilution method in accordance with the CLSI M38-A2standards using isolates of Trichophyton rubrum (n = 55), Microsporum canis (n = 9), and Trichophyton interdigitale (n = 2), which wereidentified by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer region of the rDNA.Results: According to the results of antifungal sensitivity tests, the geometric mean (GM) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)against T. rubrum was 0.10 μg/mL for ketoconazole, 0.20 μg/mL for itraconazole, 0.07 μg/mL for miconazole, 0.48 μg/mL for fluconazole,2.27 μg/mL for amphotericin B, 0.06 μg/mL for voriconazole, and 0.06 μg/mL for terbinafine.

___

  • Reiss E, Shadomy HJ, Lyon GM. Fundamental Medical Mycology. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012, pp. 527-565.
  • Nenoff P, Kruger C, Ginter-Hanselmayer G, Tietz HJ. Mycology - an update. Part 1: Dermatomycoses: causative agents, epidemiology and pathogenesis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2014; 12: 188-209; quiz 210, 188-211; quiz 212.
  • Ilkit M, Durdu M. Tinea pedis: the etiology and global epidemiology of a common fungal infection. Crit Rev Microbiol 2015; 41: 374-388.
  • Zalacain A, Obrador C, Martinez JP, Vinas M, Vinuesa T. Characterization of the antimicrobial susceptibility of fungi responsible for onychomycosis in Spain. Med Mycol 2011; 49: 495-499.
  • Jo Siu WJ, Tatsumi Y, Senda H, Pillai R, Nakamura T, Sone D, Fothergillc A. Comparison of in vitro antifungal activities of efinaconazole and currently available antifungal agents against a variety of pathogenic fungi associated with onychomycosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57: 1610-1616.
  • Sarifakioglu E, Seckin D, Demirbilek M, Can F. In vitro antifungal susceptibility patterns of dermatophyte strains causing tinea unguium. Clin Exp Dermatol 2007; 32: 675-679.
  • Bıyık F, Gräser Y, Susever S, Özarmağan G, Yeğenoğlu Y. Dermatofitlerin identifikasyonunda moleküler yöntemlerin yeri ve uygulanabilirliğinin belirlenmesi TURKDERM 2013; 41: 26-32 (in Turkish).
  • Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard, 2nd ed. M38-A2: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.
  • Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi. Approved standard M38-A. Wayne, PA, USA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2000.
  • Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi. Proposed Standard; document no. M38-P. Wayne, PA, USA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1998.
  • Ansari S, Hedayati MT, Zomorodian K, Pakshir K, Badali H, Rafiei A, Ravandeh M, Seyedmousavi S. Molecular characterization and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of 316 clinical isolates of dermatophytes in Iran. Mycopathologia 2016; 181: 89-95.
  • Badali H, Mohammadi R, Mashedi O, de Hoog GS, Meis JF. In vitro susceptibility patterns of clinically important Trichophyton and Epidermophyton species against nine antifungal drugs. Mycoses 2015; 58: 303-307.
  • Baghi N, Shokohi T, Badali H, Abastabar M. In vitro activity of new azoles luliconazole and lanoconazole compared with ten other antifungal drugs against clinical dermatophyte isolates. Med Mycol 2016; 54: 757-763.
  • Fernandez-Torres B, Carrillo AJ, Martin E, Del Palacio A, Moore MK, Valverde A, Serrano M, Guarro J. In vitro activities of 10 antifungal drugs against 508 dermatophyte strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001; 45: 2524-2528.
  • Gupta AK, Kohli Y, Batra R. In vitro activities of posaconazole, ravuconazole, terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole against dermatophyte, yeast and non-dermatophyte species. Med Mycol 2005; 43: 179-185.
  • Karaca N, Koc AN. In vitro susceptibility testing of dermatophytes: comparison of disk diffusion and reference broth dilution methods. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004; 48: 259-264.
  • Silva LB, de Oliveira DB, da Silva BV, de Souza RA, da Silva PR, Ferreira-Paim K, Andrade-Silva LE, Silva-Vergara ML, Andrade AA. Identification and antifungal susceptibility of fungi isolated from dermatomycoses. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28: 633-640.
  • Singh J, Zaman M, Gupta AK. Evaluation of microdilution and disk diffusion methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes. Med Mycol 2007; 45: 595-602.
  • Yenisehirli G, Tuncoglu E, Yenisehirli A, Bulut Y. In vitro activities of antifungal drugs against dermatophytes isolated in Tokat, Turkey. Int J Dermatol 2013; 52: 1557-1560.
  • Favre B, Hofbauer B, Hildering KS, Ryder NS. Comparison of in vitro activities of 17 antifungal drugs against a panel of 20 dermatophytes by using a microdilution assay. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 4817-4819.
  • Adimi P, Hashemi SJ, Mahmoudi M, Mirhendi H, Shidfar MR, Emmami M, Rezaei- Matehkolaei A, Gramishoar M, Parivash Kordbacheh P. Invitro activity of 10 antifungal agents against 320 dermatophyte strains using microdilution method in Tehran. Iran J Pharm Res 2013; 12: 537-545.
  • Afshari MA, Shams-Ghahfarokhi M, Razzaghi-Abyaneh M. Antifungal susceptibility and virulence factors of clinically isolated dermatophytes in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Microbiol 2016; 8: 36-46.
  • Araujo CR, Miranda KC, Fernandes Ode F, Soares AJ, Silva Mdo R. In vitro susceptibility testing of dermatophytes isolated in Goiania, Brazil, against five antifungal agents by broth microdilution method. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2009; 51: 9-12.