Does mammalian target of rapamycin or sestrin 1 protein signaling have a role in bone fracture healing?
Does mammalian target of rapamycin or sestrin 1 protein signaling have a role in bone fracture healing?
Background/aim: Fracture healing is a complex physiological process that involves a well-orchestrated series of biological events. Themammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and sestrin 1 (SESN 1) play a central role in cell metabolism, proliferation, and survival. Theaim of our study is to present serum mTOR and SESN 1 levels by comparing patients with or without bone fractures. It is also a guidefor further research on the roles of these proteins in fracture healing.Materials and methods: A total of 34 patients (10 females, 24 males) with bone fractures and 32 controls (10 females, 22 males)participated in this study. After collecting serum venous blood samples, the quantitative sandwich ELISA technique was used for thedetermination of serum mTOR and SESN 1 levels.Results: The mean serum mTOR level was significantly higher in the fracture group compared to the control group (P = 0.001). However,SESN 1 levels did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.913).Conclusion: We found that serum mTOR levels increased on the first day after fracture compared to the control group. However, weobtained no significant difference between groups in terms of SESN 1 levels. This study may guide further clinical studies investigatingthe potential role of mTOR signaling in the bone healing process.
___
- 1. Donaldson LJ, Reckless IP, Scholes S, Mindell JS, Shelton
NJ. The epidemiology of fractures in England. Journal of
Epidemiology & Community Health 2008; 62: 174-180. doi:
10.1136/jech.2006.056622
- 2. Dimitriou R, Tsiridis E, Giannoudis P V. Current concepts of
molecular aspects of bone healing. Injury 2005; 36: 1392-1404.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.019
- 3. Tsiridis E, Upadhyay N, Giannoudis P. Molecular aspects of
fracture healing: which are the important molecules? Injury
2007; 38 (Suppl. 1): S11-25. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.006
- 4. Hori K, Sen A, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Notch signaling at a
glance. Journal of Cell Science 2013; 126: 2135-2140. doi:
10.1242/jcs.127308
- 5. Guertin DA, Sabatini DM. Defining the role of mTOR in cancer.
Cancer Cell 2007; 12: 9-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.05.008
- 6. Sengupta S, Peterson TR, Sabatini DM. Regulation of the
mTOR complex 1 pathway by nutrients, growth factors,
and stress. Molecular Cell 2010; 40: 310-322. doi: 10.1016/j.
molcel.2010.09.026
- 7. Takano A, Usui I, Haruta T, Kawahara J, Uno T et al.
Mammalian target of rapamycin pathway regulates insulin
signaling via subcellular redistribution of insulin receptor
substrate 1 and integrates nutritional signals and metabolic
signals of insulin. Molecular Cellular Biology 2001; 21 (15):
5050-5062. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.15.5050-5062.2001
- 8. Sciarretta S, Volpe M, Sadoshima J. Mammalian target of
rapamycin signaling in cardiac physiology and disease.
Circulation Research 2014; 114: 549-564. doi: 10.1161/
CIRCRESAHA.114.302022
- 9. Spilman P, Podlutskaya N, Hart MJ, Debnath J, Gorostiza O
et al. Inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin abolishes cognitive
deficits and reduces amyloid-β levels in a mouse model of
Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 2010; 5 (4): e9979. doi: 10.1371/
journal.pone.0009979
- 10. Yang SB, Tien AC, Boddupalli G, Xu AW, Jan YN et al.
Rapamycin ameliorates age-dependent obesity associated with
increased mTOR signaling in hypothalamic POMC neurons.
Neuron 2012; 75: 425-436. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.043
- 11. Takayama K, Kawakami Y, Lavasani M, Mu X, Cummins JH et
al. mTOR signaling plays a critical role in the defects observed
in muscle-derived stem/progenitor cells isolated from a murine
model of accelerated aging. Journal of Orthopaedic Research
2017; 35: 1375-1382. doi: 10.1002/jor.23409
- 12. Chen J, Long F. MTOR signaling in skeletal development and
disease. Bone Research 2018; 6: 1. doi: 10.1038/s41413-017-
0004-5
- 13. Fitter S, Matthews MP, Martin SK, Xie J, Ooi SS et al. mTORC1
plays an important role in skeletal development by controlling
pre-osteoblast differentiation. Molecular and Cellular Biology
2017; 37: 1-20. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00668-16
- 14. Lee JH, Budanov AV, Karin M. Sestrins orchestrate cellular
metabolism to attenuate aging. Cell Metabolism 2013; 18: 792-
801. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.08.018
- 15. Alvarez-Garcia O, Carbajo-Perez E, Garcia E, Gil H, Molinos I
et al. Rapamycin retards growth and causes marked alterations
in the growth plate of young rats. Pediatric Nephrology 2007;
22: 954-961. doi: 10.1007/s00467-007-0456-8
- 16. Holstein JH, Klein M, Garcia P, Histing T, Culemann U et
al. Rapamycin affects early fracture healing in mice. British
Journal of Pharmacology 2008; 154: 1055-1062. doi: 10.1038/
bjp.2008.167
- 17. Yang G, Duan X, Lin D, Li T, Luo D et al. Rapamycin-induced
autophagy activity promotes bone fracture healing in rats.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 2015; 10: 1327-1333.
doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2660
- 18. Einhorn TA. Enhancement of fracture-healing. Journal of
Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 1995; 77: 940-956.
doi: 10.2106/00004623-199506000-00016
- 19. O’Neill KR, Stutz CM, Mignemi NA, Burns MC, Murry MR et
al. Micro-computed tomography assessment of the progression
of fracture healing in mice. Bone 2012; 50: 1357-1367. doi:
10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.008
- 20. Guntur AR, Rosen CJ. Bone as an endocrine organ. Endocrine
Practice 2012; 18 (5): 758-762. doi: 10.4158/EP12141.RA
- 21. Shen G, Ren H, Qiu T, Zhang Z, Zhao W et al. Mammalian
target of rapamycin as a therapeutic target in osteoporosis.
Journal of Cellular Physiology 2018; 233 (5): 3929-3944. doi:
10.1002/jcp.26161
- 22. Martin SK, Fitter S, Bong LF, Drew JJ, Gronthos S et al. NVPBEZ235, a dual pan class I PI3 kinase and mTOR inhibitor,
promotes osteogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal
stromal cells. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2010; 25:
2126-2137. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.114
- 23. Ghiasi MS, Chen J, Vaziri A, Rodriguez EK, Nazarian A. Bone
fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling: a review of
principles and methods. Bone Reports 2017; 6: 87-100. doi:
10.1016/j.bonr.2017.03.002
- 24. You JS, Anderson GB, Dooley MS, Hornberger TA. The role
of mTOR signaling in the regulation of protein synthesis and
muscle mass during immobilization in mice. Disease Models
& Mechanisms 2015; 8: 1059-1069. doi: 10.1242/dmm.019414
- 25. Ma J, Li M, Hock J, Yu X. Hyperactivation of mTOR critically
regulates abnormal osteoclastogenesis in neurofibromatosis
type 1. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2012; 30: 144-152. doi:
10.1002/jor.21497
- 26. Liu X, Joshi SK, Samagh SP, Dang YX, Laron D et al. Evaluation
of Akt/mTOR activity in muscle atrophy after rotator cuff tears
in a rat model. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2012; 30:
1440-1446. doi: 10.1002/jor.22096
- 27. Zhou R, Zhang Z, Zhao L, Jia C, Xu S et al. Inhibition of mTOR
signaling by oleanolic acid contributes to its anti-tumor activity
in osteosarcoma cells. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2011;
29: 846-852. doi: 10.1002/jor.21311
- 28. Jiang LB, Jin YL, Wang HR, Jiang YQ, Dong J. Glucosamine
protects nucleus pulposus cells and induces autophagy via the
mTOR-dependent pathway. Journal of Orthopaedic Research
2014; 32: 1532-1542. doi: 10.1002/jor.22699
- 29. Joshi SK, Liu X, Samagh SP, Lovett DH, Bodine SC et al. MTOR
regulates fatty infiltration through SREBP-1 and PPARγ after
a combined massive rotator cuff tear and suprascapular nerve
injury in rats. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2013; 31: 724-
730. doi: 10.1002/jor.22254
- 30. Budanov AV, Karin M. p53 target genes sestrin1 and sestrin2
connect genotoxic stress and mTOR signaling. Cell 2008; 134:
451-460. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.028
- 31. Ho A, Cho CS, Namkoong S, Cho US, Lee JH. Biochemical
basis underlying sestrins’ physiological activities. Trends in
Biochemical Sciences 2016; 41 (7): 621-632. doi: 10.1016/j.
tibs.2016.04.005
- 32. Crisol BM, Lenhare L, Gaspar RS, Gaspar RC, Muñoz VR et al.
The role of physical exercise on Sestrin1 and 2 accumulations
in the skeletal muscle of mice. Life Sciences 2018; 194: 98-103.
doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2017.12.023