Dilek ASLAN, Celile HATİPOĞLU, Zeynep ALTIN, Necmiye BEYDAĞ

Does employment status influence obesity prevalence among females? A comparative study from Ankara, Turkey

Aim: In this study, we aimed to compare the nutritional habits and obesity status of employed and not-employed (i.e. homemakers) women from an urban population in Ankara between April 2 and 17, 2007. Materials and methods: Employed females (107) were amongst Keçiören (a district of Ankara) municipal employees, and homemakers were selected among the residents of the catchment area of a primary health care unit (PHCU) within the same district. The 2 groups (employed and homemakers) were high school and university graduates and were similar to each other in terms of education and age. The World Health Organization defines "overweight" as a BMI equal to or more than 25kg/m2, and "obesity" as a BMI equal to or more than 30 kg/m2. Results: When backward logistic regression model was performed for some selected factors (age, marital status, fast food consumption, smoking status, employment status, and regular breakfast consumption) related to overweight and obesity, there was a positive relationship between age [(P = 0.002; OR(95%CI) 1.112 (1.039-1.190)] and employment status [(P = 0.037; OR(95%CI) 1.873 (1.039-3.379)]. Conclusion: Employment status and age were found to be risk factors for overweight and obesity. Healthy life skills programs are recommended to be promoted giving priority to the influencing factors, such as age and employment status in order to prevent overweight and obesity among women.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Key words: Obesity, female, occupational status, homemaker, urban

Does employment status influence obesity prevalence among females? A comparative study from Ankara, Turkey

Keywords:

Key words: Obesity, female, occupational status, homemaker, urban,

PDF

___

Ageing and Health. A Health Promotion Approach for Developing Countries. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. 2003. http://www.wpro. who.int/NR/rdonlyres/29B340EA-0D98-4338-BD6D- AE13F5E8D34B/0/Ageing_and_Health.pdf. Last accessed: 1 April 2009.
Misra A, Pandey RM, Devi JR, Sharma R, Vikram NK, Khanna N. High prevalence of diabetes, obesity and dyslipidemia in urban slum population in northern India. Int J Obes 2001; 25: 1722–1729.
Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. WHO technical report series 916. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. Geneva 2003. p. 2.
Satman I, Yılmaz T, Sengul A, et al. The TURDEP group, Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1551–1556.
Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obesity Reviews 2007; 8(4): 307-326.
DelPrete LR, Caldwell M, English C, Banspach SW, Lefebvre C. Self-reported and measured weights and heights of participants in community-based weight loss programs. J Am Diet Assoc 1992; 92: 1483–1486.
Böckerman P, Johansson E, Jousilahti P, Uutela A. The physical strenuousness of work is slightly associated with an upward trend in the BMI. Social Science & Medicine 2008; 66: 1346- 1355.
Haveman-Nies A, CPGM de Groot L, Staveren WA. Dietary quality, lifestyle factors and healthy ageing in Europe: the SENECA study. Age Ageing 2003 Jul; 32(4): 427-34.
Brownson RC, Eyler AA, King AC, Brown DR, Shyu YL, Sallis JF. Patterns and correlates of physical activity among US women 40 years and older. Am J Public Health 2000; 90(2): 264-70.
Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Wilson C. Lifestyle modification for the management of obesity. Gastroenterology 2007; 132(6): 2226-38.