Mine Fedakar ŞENYÜCEL, Ebru Şebnem AYVA, Mustafa Kemal ASLAN, Özlem BOYBEYİ, Tutku SOYER, Nurkan AKSOY, Üçler KISA, Ahmet Murat ÇAKMAK

Comparison of the effect of contrast medium, air, and ozone on ischemia/reperfusion injury due to experimental intussusception model

To compare effects of contrast medium, air, and ozone on ischemia/reperfusion injury due to intussusception. Materials and methods: Thirty Wistar rats were allocated into five groups (n = 6). In the control group (CG), 2 cm of colonic segment, 5 cm distal to ileocecal valve, was removed. Intussusception was performed at 5 cm distal to the ileocecal valve by pushing a proximal intestinal segment distally by stile in experimental groups. One hour later, in the sham-operated group (SG), manual reduction was performed. In the reduction groups, reduction of intussusception was performed by contrast medium (CMG, 1/1 diluted omnipaqueR, infusion rate 2 mL/min), by air (AG, Pmax = 60 mmHg), or by ozone (OG, 10 µg/mL, 0.5 mg/kg, Pmax = 60 mmHg). One hour after reduction, 2 cm of colonic segment was removed. Colonic tissues were evaluated for histopathological grades and oxidative injury markers (malondialdehyde [MDA], nitric oxide [NO], and total sulfhydryl [T-SH] values). Results: Mucosal injury score was significantly higher in AG then in CG or SG (P < 0.05). There was no difference regarding mucosal injury between the other groups (P > 0.05). MDA levels were significantly higher and NO levels were significantly lower in CMG, OG, and AG than in CG (P < 0.05). There was no difference between OG and the other experimental groups in both MDA and NO levels (P > 0.05). Conclusion: None of the reduction methods in intussusception have superiority over others in preventing ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Comparison of the effect of contrast medium, air, and ozone on ischemia/reperfusion injury due to experimental intussusception model

Keywords:

Intussusception, ozone, intestine, ischemia-reperfusion, injury, experimental,

PDF

___

Carden DL, Granger DN. Pathophysiology of ischaemia- reperfusion injury. J Pathol 2000; 190: 255–66.
Chiu CJ, McArdle AH, Brown R, Scott HJ, Gurd FN. Intestinal mucosal lesion in low-flow states. Arch Surg 1970; 101: 478–83.
Miranda KM, Espey MG, Wink DA. A rapid simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide 2001; 5: 62–71.
Sedlak J, Lindsay RH. Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent. Anal Biochem 1968; 25: 192–205.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193: 265–75.
Armstrong D, Al-Awadi F. Lipid peroxidation and retinopathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Free Radic Biol Med 1991; 11: 433–6.
Ciscato JG Jr, Capellini VK, Celotto AC, Baldo CF, Joviliano EE, Evora PR, Dalio MB, Piccinato CE. Vascular relaxation of canine visceral arteries after ischemia by means of supraceliac aortic cross-clamping followed by reperfusion. Scand J Trau Resus Emerg Med 2010; 18: 41.
Iglesias AF, Nşñez LG, Fernández JLC, Salgueiro SR, Febles ES. Ozone postconditioning in renal ischaemia-reperfusion model. Functional and morphological evidences. Nefrologia 2011; 31: 464–70.