Comparison of the analgesic effects of paracetamol and tramadol in lumbar disc surgery

Background/aim: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and side effects of paracetamol and tramadol in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery. Materials and methods: Group P (paracetamol group) was given 1 g of paracetamol intravenously 30 min before the end of the operation and 1 g each day at 6-h intervals. Group T (tramadol group) was given 1.5 mg/kg of tramadol as a loading dose and patient-controlled analgesia for 1 day. Hemodynamic parameters, modified Aldrete score, Ramsay sedation scale score, patient satisfaction scale (PSS) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, nausea/vomiting scale score, and additional analgesic needs/times were recorded. Results: PSS scores were significantly higher in Group T (P < 0.05). The total analgesic consumption was significantly higher in Group P. There were no significant differences in the VAS scores at any time points. Twenty-one patients in Group P and 8 patients in Group T needed additional analgesia (P < 0.05). The first additional analgesic time was earlier in Group P, and pain was more evident at the 15th minute and at hours 2 and 6 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Paracetamol alone was not able to provide effective analgesia. Tramadol was more effective in the treatment of postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery.

Comparison of the analgesic effects of paracetamol and tramadol in lumbar disc surgery

Background/aim: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and side effects of paracetamol and tramadol in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery. Materials and methods: Group P (paracetamol group) was given 1 g of paracetamol intravenously 30 min before the end of the operation and 1 g each day at 6-h intervals. Group T (tramadol group) was given 1.5 mg/kg of tramadol as a loading dose and patient-controlled analgesia for 1 day. Hemodynamic parameters, modified Aldrete score, Ramsay sedation scale score, patient satisfaction scale (PSS) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, nausea/vomiting scale score, and additional analgesic needs/times were recorded. Results: PSS scores were significantly higher in Group T (P < 0.05). The total analgesic consumption was significantly higher in Group P. There were no significant differences in the VAS scores at any time points. Twenty-one patients in Group P and 8 patients in Group T needed additional analgesia (P < 0.05). The first additional analgesic time was earlier in Group P, and pain was more evident at the 15th minute and at hours 2 and 6 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Paracetamol alone was not able to provide effective analgesia. Tramadol was more effective in the treatment of postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery.

___

  • 1. White PF. The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 5–22.
  • 2. Power I. Recent advances in postoperative pain therapy. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 43–51
  • 3. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 2003; 362: 1921–1928.
  • 4. White PF. Multimodal analgesia: its role in preventing postoperative pain. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2008; 9: 76–82.
  • 5. Maund E, McDaid C, Rice S, Wright K, Jenkins B, Woolacott N. Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the reduction in morphinerelated side-effects after major surgery: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 292–297.
  • 6. Brull R, Mc Cartney CJ, Chan VW, El-Beheiry H. Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 965–974.
  • 7. Grond S, Sablotzki A. Clinical pharmacology of tramadol. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43: 879–923.
  • 8. Bannwarth B, Pehourcq F. Pharmacologic basis for using paracetamol: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues. Drugs 2003; 63: 5–13.
  • 9. Pickering G, Loriot MA, Libert F, Eschalier A, Beaune P, Dubray C. Analgesic effect of acetaminophen in humans: first evidence of a central serotonergic mechanism. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006; 79: 371–378.
  • 10. Olonisakin RP, Amanor-Boadu SD, Akinyemi AO. Morphinesparing effect of intravenous paracetamol for postoperative pain management following gynaecological surgery. Afr J Med Med Sci 2012; 41: 429–436.
  • 11. Remy C, Marret E, Bonnet F. State of the art of paracetamol in acute pain therapy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006; 19: 562–565.
  • 12. Khazin V, Weitzman S, Rozenzvit-Podles E, Ezri T, Debby A, Golan A, Evron S. Postoperative analgesia with tramadol and indomethacin for diagnostic curettage and early termination of pregnancy. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011; 20: 236–239.
  • 13. Hernández-Palazón J, Tortosa JA, Martínez-Lage JF, PérezFlores D. Intravenous administration of propacetamol reduces morphine consumption after spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analgy 2001; 92: 1473–1476.
  • 14. Korkmaz Dilmen O, Tunali Y, Cakmakkaya OS, Yentur E, Tutuncu AC, Tureci E, Bahar M. Efficacy of intravenous paracetamol, metamizol and lornoxicam on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after lumbar disc surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 428–432.
  • 15. Tunali Y, Akçil EF, Dilmen OK, Tutuncu AC, Koksal GM, Akbas S, Vehid H, Yentur E. Efficacy of intravenous paracetamol and dexketoprofen on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after a lumbar disk surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2013; 25: 143–147.
  • 16. Grundmann U, Wörnle C, Biedler A, Kreuer S, Wrobel M, Wilhelm W. The efficacy of the non-opioid analgesics parecoxib, paracetamol and metamizol for postoperative pain relief after lumbar microdiscectomy. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 217–222.
  • 17. Cakan T, Inan N, Culhaoglu S, Bakkal K, Basar H. Intravenous paracetamol improves the quality of postoperative analgesia but does not decrease narcotic requirements. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2008; 20: 169–173.
  • 18. Ohnesorge H, Bein B, Hanss R, Francksen H, Mayer L, Scholz J, Tonner PH. Paracetamol versus metamizole in the treatment of postoperative pain after breast surgery: a randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 648–653.
  • 19. Mowafi HA, Elmakarim EA, Ismail S, Al-Mahdy M, El-Saflan AE, Elsaid AS. Intravenous lornoxicam is more effective than paracetamol as a supplemental analgesic after lower abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2012; 36: 2039–2044.
  • 20. Scott LJ, Perry CM. Tramadol: a review of its use in perioperative pain. Drugs 2000; 60: 139–176.
  • 21. Kumar KP, Kulkarni DK, Gurajala I, Gopinath R. Pregabalin versus tramadol for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. J Pain Res 2013; 6: 471–478.
  • 22. Uysal HY, Takmaz SA, Yaman F, Baltaci B, Başar H. The efficacy of intravenous paracetamol versus tramadol for postoperative analgesia after adenotonsillectomy in children. J Clin Anesth 2011; 23: 53–57.
  • 23. Lin FS, Lin WY, Lai CH, Chen CY, Lin CP, Lin TF, Sun WZ. Analgesic efficacy of tramadol/acetaminophen and propoxyphene/acetaminophen for relief of postoperative wound pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2012; 50: 49–53.
  • 24. Brattwall M, Turan I, Jacobsson J. Pain management after elective hallux valgus surgery: a prospective randomized double-blind study comparing etoricoxib and tramadol. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 544–549.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effect of keratinocyte growth factor on growth and transdifferentiation of primary alveolar epithelial type II cells

Xiuxiang LIU, ZHICHUN FENG, Chunmei TIAN, Xiangyong KONG, YUMEI WU, Changjun LV

The first PTPN11 mutations in hotspot exons reported in Moroccan children with Noonan syndrome and comparison of mutation rate to the previous studies

IHSSANE EL BOUCHIKHI, IMANE SAMRI, MOHAMMED IRAQUI HOUSSAINI, SAAID TRHANINT, LAILA BOUGUENOUCH, HANANE SAYEL, MOUSTAPHA HIDA, SAMIR ATMANI, KARIM OULDIM

Quantitative study of epigenetic signature in head >and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Ayesha UMAIR, Bassel TARAKJI, Alzoghaibi IBRAHIM, Azzeghaibi NASSER, Alenzi FQ, Ayesha SHREEN

Two gastrointestinal conditions with similar symptoms and endoscopic appearance: irritable bowel syndrome and microscopic colitis

Zahide ŞİMŞEK, Nazife Candan TUNÇER, Hakan ALAGÖZLÜ, Fatih KARAAHMET, Şahin ÇOBAN, Ayşe DURSUN

A CGH array study in nonsyndromic (primary) autism patients: deletions on 16p13.11, 16p11.2, 1q21.1, 2q21.1q21.2, and 8p23.1

KUDRET ESEN GÜMÜŞLÜ, HAKAN SAVLI, DENİZ SÜNNETÇİ, NACİ ÇİNE, BÜLENT KARA, SEDA EREN KESKİN, RAMİS UFUK AKKOYUNLU

Comparison of the analgesic effects of paracetamol and tramadol in lumbar disc surgery

Mehmet Ziya YILMAZ, Bahriye Binnur SARIHASAN, Ebru KELSAKA, Nilay TAŞ, Aysun Çağlar TORUN, Ersin KÖKSAL, Enis KURUOĞLU

The role of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

Meryem AKTAN, Mehmet KOÇ

Hypolipidemic efects of nimesulide and celecoxib in experimentally induced hypercholesterolemia in rabbits

Saima GUL, Muhammad RIAZ, Muhammad ZIA-UL-HAQ, Sagheer AHMED

Protective effect of \beta-glucan on acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in rats

MERYEM IRAZ, MUSTAFA IRAZ, MUKADDES EŞREFOĞLU, MEHMET ŞERİF AYDIN

Hemodynamic efects of atrial natriuretic peptide in ischemia-reperfusion injury that occurs afer exercise

Necdet SÜT, Elif Ezgi GÜREL, Selma Arzu VARDAR, Çetin Hakan KARADAĞ, Ruhan Deniz TOPUZ, Orkide PALABIYIK, Semra ÇALIŞKAN, Serap ÖZEN TOPÇU