Analysis of 161 adult patients with brucellosis
To evaluate the epidemiology, clinical features, and complications of brucellosis. Materials and methods: Between January 2005 and December 2008, 161 patients with brucellosis who were admitted to our clinic were evaluated prospectively. Results: Of the patients, 97 (60.2%) were male, and the mean age was 47 ± 17 years (range: 16-79). There were 99 patients (61.5%) classified as acute, 36 (22.4%) classified as subacute, and 6 (3.7%) classified as having a chronic infection. Relapse or reinfection was observed in 20 (12.4%) patients. Blood culture positivity rates were 60.7% and 44.8% among acute and subacute cases, respectively (P = 0.008). In 40 of 70 culture positive patients, standard Brucella tube agglutination titers were found above 1/1280 (P = 0.03). Blood culture positivity was also higher in febrile patients (P = 0.001). Complications were detected in 66 of 161 patients (41.0%). Osteoarticular system involvement was the most common complication (50 patients, 31.1%). Fever, positive blood cultures, and hepatosplenomegaly were significantly higher in the group without complications (P < 0.05). Complications were significantly lower in acute infections than in subacute infections (P < 0.05). There were also higher complication rates detected in the patients with reinfection and relapse (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In endemic regions, brucellosis is an important infectious disease causing chronic infections and complications.
Analysis of 161 adult patients with brucellosis
To evaluate the epidemiology, clinical features, and complications of brucellosis. Materials and methods: Between January 2005 and December 2008, 161 patients with brucellosis who were admitted to our clinic were evaluated prospectively. Results: Of the patients, 97 (60.2%) were male, and the mean age was 47 ± 17 years (range: 16-79). There were 99 patients (61.5%) classified as acute, 36 (22.4%) classified as subacute, and 6 (3.7%) classified as having a chronic infection. Relapse or reinfection was observed in 20 (12.4%) patients. Blood culture positivity rates were 60.7% and 44.8% among acute and subacute cases, respectively (P = 0.008). In 40 of 70 culture positive patients, standard Brucella tube agglutination titers were found above 1/1280 (P = 0.03). Blood culture positivity was also higher in febrile patients (P = 0.001). Complications were detected in 66 of 161 patients (41.0%). Osteoarticular system involvement was the most common complication (50 patients, 31.1%). Fever, positive blood cultures, and hepatosplenomegaly were significantly higher in the group without complications (P < 0.05). Complications were significantly lower in acute infections than in subacute infections (P < 0.05). There were also higher complication rates detected in the patients with reinfection and relapse (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In endemic regions, brucellosis is an important infectious disease causing chronic infections and complications.
___
- Koneman EW. Brucella species. In: Koneman EW, Allen DS, Janda WM, Shreckenberger PC, Winn WC, editors. Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997. p.431–6.
- Young EJ. Brucella species. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p.2669–74.
- Atmaca S, Özekinci T, Akpolat N, Elçi S, Suay A, Arıkan E. Brucellosis seroprevalence in Southeast Turkey (Diyarbakır). Turk J Med Sci 2004; 34: 251–5.
- Gwida M, Al Dahouk S, Melzer F, Rösler U, Neubauer H, Tomaso H. Brucellosis- regionally emerging zoonotic disease? Croat Med J 2010; 51: 289–95.
- Yumuk Z, O’Callaghan D. Brucellosis in Turkey - an overview. Int J Infect Dis 2012; 16: 228–35.
- Solera J, Martinez-Alfaro E, Espinosa A. Recognition and optimum treatment of brucellosis. Drugs 1997; 53: 245–56.
- Doğanay M, Meşe EA. Topçu AW, Söyletir G, Doğanay M, eds. İnfeksiyon hastalıkları ve mikrobiyolojisi. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri; 2008. p.897–909 (in Turkish).
- Akdeniz H, Irmak H, Demiröz AP. Evaluation of brucellosis cases in Van region of Eastern Anatolia: a 3 year experience. Nogoya Med J 1998; 42: 101–10.
- Taşova Y, Saltoğlu N, Yılmaz G, İnal S, Aksu HSZ. Bruselloz: 238 erişkin olgunun klinik, laboratuvar ve tedavi özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Turkish J Infect 1998; 12: 307–12 (in Turkish).
- Kadanali A, Ozden K, Altoparlak U, Erturk A, Parlak M. Bacteremic and nonbacteremic brucellosis: clinical and laboratory observations. Infection 2009; 37: 67–9.
- Colmenero JD, Reguera JM, Mortos F, Sanchez-De-Mora D, Delgado M, Causse M et al. Complications associated with Brucella melitensis infection: a study of 530 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1996; 75: 195–211.
- Aygen B, Sümerken B, Kardaş Y, Doğanay M, İnan M. Bruselloz: 183 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. KLİMİK Derg 1995; 8: 13–6 (in Turkish).
- Solera J, Lozano E, Martinez, Alfaro E, Espinosa A, Castillejos ML et al. Brucellar spondylitis: review of 35 cases and literature survey. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 1440–9.
- Çalık Ş, Gökengin AD. Human brucellosis in Turkey: a review of the literature between 1990 and 2009. Turk J Med Sci 2011; 41: 549–55.
- Bulut C, Yetkin MA, Yılmaz G, Erdinç FŞ, Hatipoğlu ÇA, Kınıklı S et al. Assessment of the findings on the existence of complications in brucellosis. Turk J Med Sci 2011; 41: 275–82. Bodur H, Erbay A, Colpan A, Akinci E. Brucellar spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 2004; 24: 221–6.
- Kadanali A, Varoglu E, Kerek M, Tasyaran MA. Tc-99m polyclonal human immunoglobulin scintigraphy in brucellosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005; 11: 480–5.
- Buzgan T, Karahocagil MK, Irmak H, Baran AI, Karsen H, Evirgen O et al. Clinical manifestations and complications in 1028 cases of brucellosis: a retrospective evaluation and review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis 2010; 14: e469–78.
- Aygen B, Eşel D, Erdoğan N, Sümerkan B, Doğanay M. Psoas abscess secondary to brucellar spondylitis. Turk J Med Sci 2002; 32: 81–3.
- Kurtaran B, Candevir A, İnal AS, Kömür S, Akyıldız Ö, Saltoğlu N et al. Clinical appearance of brucellosis in adults: fourteen years of experience. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42: 497–505.
- Taşova Y, Saltoğlu N, Şahin G, Aksu HSZ. Osteoarticular involvement of brucellosis in Turkey. Clin Rheumatol 1999; 18: 214–
- Gotuzzo E, Carillo C. Brucella. In: Gorbach SL, Barlett JG, Blacklow NR, editors. Infectious diseases. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p.1717–24.
- Ariza J, Pujol M, Valverde J, Nolla JM, Rufí G, Viladrich PF et al. Brucellar sacroiliitis: findings in 63 episodes and current relevance. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 16: 761–5.
- Hashemi SH, Keramat F, Ranjbar M, Mamani M, Farzam A, Jamal-Omidi S. Osteoarticular complications of brucellosis in Hamedan, an endemic area in the west of Iran. Int J Infect Dis 2007; 11: 496–500.
- Khateeb MI, Araj GF, Majeed SA, Lulu AR. Brucella arthritis: a study of 96 cases in Kuwait. Ann Rheum Dis 1990; 49: 994–8.
- Resnick D, Niwayama G. Osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and soft tissue infection: organisms. In: Resnick D, editor. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1995. p.2448–558.
- Montejo JM, Alberolo I, Glez-Zarete P, Alvarez A, Alonso J, Canovas A et al. Open randomized therapeutic trial of six antimicrobial regimens in the treatment of human brucellosis. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 16: 671–6.
- Cisneros JM, Viciana P, Colmenero J, Pachon J, Martinez C, Alarcon A. Multicenter prospective study of treatment of Brucella melitensis brucellosis with doxycycline for 6 weeks plus streptomycin for 2 weeks. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 1990; 34: 881–3.
- Akinci E, Bodur H, Cevik MA, Erbay A, Eren SS, Ziraman I et al. A complication of brucellosis : epididymoorchitis. Int J InfectDis 2006; 10: 171–7.
- Bodur H, Erbay A, Akinci E, Çolpan A, Çevik MA, Balaban N. Neurobrucellosis in an endemic area of brucellosis. Scand J Infect Dis 2003; 35: 94–7.
- Yetkin MA, Bulut C, Erdinc FS, Oral B, Tulek N. Evaluation of the clinical presentations in neurobrucellosis. Int J Infect Dis 2006; 10: 446–52.
- Kizilkilic O, Calli C. Neurobrucellosis. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2011; 21: 927–37.
- Bouza E, García de la Torre M, Parras F, Guerrero A, RodríguezCréixems M, Gobernado J et al. Brucellar meningitis. Rev Infect Dis 1987; 9: 810–22.
- Bodur H, Balaban N, Aksaray S, Yetener V, Akinci E, Colpan A et al. Biotypes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Brucella isolates. Scand J Infect Dis 2003; 35: 337–8.
- Ayaşlıoğlu E, Kılıç S, Aydın K, Kılıç D, Kaygusuz S, Ağalar C. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Brucella melitensis isolates from blood samples. Turk J Med Sci 2008; 38: 257–62.
- Kaya O, Akçam FZ, Yaylı G. Investigation of the in vitro activities of various antibiotics against Brucella melitensis strains. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42: 145–8.
- Solera J. Update on brucellosis: therapeutic challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 36: S18–20. del Pozo JSG, Solera J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis. PLoSOne 2012; 7: e32090.
- Al Dahouk S, Nöckler K. Implications of laboratory diagnosis on brucellosis therapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2011; 9: 833–45.
- Gotuzzo E, Carrillo C, Guerra J, Llosa L. An evaluation of diagnostic methods for brucellosis-the value of bone marrow culture. J Infect Dis 1986; 153: 122–5.
- Özkurt Z, Kaya A, Taşyaran MA, Yılmaz Ş. Bruselloz tanısında standart tüp aglütinasyon testi, kan ve kemik iliği kültürlerinin tanı değerlerinin karşılaştırılması. İnfeksiyon Dergisi 2000; 14: 463–8 (in Turkish).
- Eales KM, Norton RE, Ketheesan N. Brucellosis in Northern Australia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010; 83: 876–8.