RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WATER USE EFFICIENCY AND δ13C ISOTOPE DISCRIMINATION OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamustinctorius L.)UNDER DROUGHT STRESS

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WATER USE EFFICIENCY AND δ13C ISOTOPE DISCRIMINATION OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamustinctorius L.)UNDER DROUGHT STRESS

Drought stress is one of the most limiting factors in agricultural productivity because of its highly negative effect on photosynthesis and growth of plants. The main objectives of this study were to determine the performance of four selected safflower genotypes (Remzibey, Dinçer, Balcı and TRE-ASL09/14) against drought stress. The relationship between water use efficiency (WUE) and δ13C (isotope discrimination) was investigated under well watered (60%) and drought stress (30%) irrigation in controlled conditions in a green house. The result showed that drought stress clearly reduced plant biomass, leaf area, leaf number, relative water content (RWC), specific leaf weight (SLW), WUE and δ13C in all genotypes, while chlorophyll increased under drought stress. There were significant differences between performances of all safflower genotypes in terms of response to drought stress. High WUE and low δ13C discrimination under drought stress were inversely associated with a strong regression relationship (R2=0.75). The analysis of δ13C revealed a substantial variation in water use efficiency among the genotypes under drought stress. It was revealed that low δ13C discrimination types had high WUE, RWC and total biomass under drought stress. Thus, the ability of the low δC genotypes (high water use efficiency, WUE) to maintain higher RWC may provide a good indication of the differences in drought tolerance of safflower genotypes differing in δ13C. Overall, on the basis of the consistent percentage reductions in plant heights, total dry weight, leaf area, RWC, WUE and low δ13C, the TRE-ASL09/14 new breeding line was found to be more drought tolerant when compared with the other safflower hybrids under drought stress. As a result of our study it is suggested that there is a strong relationship between WUE and lower δ13C under drought stress, indicating that it may be used as a selection criterion for developing safflower genotypes with drought tolerance

___

  • Anyia, A.O. andH. Herzog.2004. Water-use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under mid-season drought. Eur. J.Agron.20: 327-339.
  • Araus, J.L., L.Alegre., l. Tapia andR. Calafell. 1986. Relationship between leaf structure and gas exchange in wheat leaves at different insertion levels. J.Exp. Bot.37:1323-1333.
  • Arslan, B., F. Altuner andM. Tunçtürk. 2003.A study onyield and yieldcharacteristics ofsomesafflower (Carthamustinctorius L.) cultivarsgrownin Van.Türkiye 5. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 13-17 Ekim, Diyarbakır.
  • Askahni, J., H. Pakniyat and V.Ghotbi.2007. Genetic evaluation of severe physiological traits for screening of suitable spring safflower (Carthamustinctorius L.) genotypes under stress and non-stress irrigatipon regimes. Pakistan J. Bio. Sci. 10: 2320-2326.
  • Bhatia, P.K., A. Muktar andC.S. Vaidyanathan. 1994.Chloroplasticglutamine synthetase from normal and water stressedsafflower (Carthamustinctorius L.) leaves. Plant Sci.95: 153-164.
  • Blum, A.2005.Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive?. Aust. J.Agr. Res.56:1159–1168.
  • Chaves, M.M., J.S. Pereira., J. Maroco., M.L. Rodrigues., C.P.P. Ricardo., M.L. Oserio., I. Carvalho., T. Faria andC. Pinheiro. 2002. How do plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth.Ann. Bot-London.89: 907–916.
  • Condon, A.G., R.A. Richards., G.J. Rebetzke andG.D. Farquhar. 2002. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci.42: 122-131.
  • Condon, A.G., R.A. Richards., G.J. Rebetzke andG.D. Farquhar. 2004.Breeding for high wateruse efficiency. J. Exp. Bot.55:2447–2460.
  • Cushman, J.C. 2001. Osmoregulation in plants: implications for agriculture. Am. Zool.41: 758-769.
  • David, R.B. andJ.M. Duniway. 2007. Effects of mycorhizal infection on drought tolerance and recovery in safflower and wheat. Plant Soil Environ.197:95-103.
  • Dordas, A.C. andC. Sioulas. 2008.Safflower yield, chlorophyll content,photosynthesis, and water use efficiency response tonitrogen fertilization under rainfed conditions. Ind. Crops Prod.27: 75-85.
  • Eslam, B.P. 2011.Evaluationof physiological indices for improving water deficit tolerance in spring safflower. J. Agric. Sci. Technol.13:327-338.
  • França, M.G.C., A.T.P. Thi., C. Pimentel., R.O.P. Rossiello., Y. Zuily-Fodil.andD. Lafrray. 2000.Differences in growth and water relations among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induced drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot.43: 227-237.
  • Farquhar, G.D., J.R. Ehleringer andK.T. Hubic. 1989.Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Phys.40:503-537.
  • Farooq, M., A. Wahid., N. Kobayashi., D. Fujita andS.M.A. Basra. 2009.Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev.29:185–212. Gates, D.M. 1965.Energy, plants and ecology.Ecology.46:1-13.
  • Gupta, S.A. andG.A. Berkowitz. 1987. Osmotic adjustment, symplast volume and nonstomatally mediated water stress inhibition of photosynthesis in wheat. Plant Physiol.87: 1040–1047.
  • Harbi, A.,A. Krishnan., M.M.R. Ambavaram andA. Pereira. 2010.Molecular and physiological analysis of drought stress in arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth1[C][W][OA]. Plant Physiol.154:1254–1271.
  • Hsiao, T.C., R. Acevedo., E. Fereres andD.W. Henderson.1976.Stress, growth and osmotic adjustment. Phil. Trans. R. Soc.Lond. B.273: 479–500.
  • Lawlor, D.W. 2002.Limitation to photosynthesis in water stressed leaves: stomata versus metabolism and the role of ATP. Ann.Bot.89: 871-885.
  • Lawlor, D.W. andG. Cornic. 2002. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant Cell Environ.25:275–294.
  • Levitt, J. 1972.Responses of plants to environmental stresses.(Academic Press: New York).
  • Levitt, J. 1980.Responses of plants to environmental Stresses. Ed 2. 1: Chilling, Freezing and High Temperature Stresses. New York: Academic Press.
  • Majidi, M.M., V. Tavakoli.,A. Mirlohi andM.R. Sabzalian. 2011.Wild safflower species (CarthamusoxyacanthusBieb.): Apossible source of drought tolerance for arid environments. Aus. J. Crop Sci. 5: 1055-1063.
  • Mitchell, J.H., D. Siamhan.,M.H. Wamala., J.B. Risimeri., E. Chinyamakobvu.,S.A. Henderson andS. Fukai. 1998. The use of seedling leaf death scorefor evaluation of drought resistance of rice. Field Crops Res. 55:129–139.
  • Munoz.P., J. Voltas., J.L. Araus., E. Igartua andI. Romagosa. 1998.Changes over time in the adaptation of barley releases in north-eastern Spain. Plant Breeding.117: 531–535.
  • Munns, R., J.B. Passioura., J. Guo., O. Chazen andG.R. Cramer. 2000. Water relations and leaf expansion: importance of time scale. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1495-1504.
  • Namirembe, S., R.M. Brook andC.K. Ong. 2008. Manipulating phenology and water relations in Senna spectabilis in waterlimited environment in Kenya. AgroforestSyst. 75: 197–210.
  • O'Neill, S.D. 1983.Role of osmotic potential gradients during water stress and leaf senescence in Fragariavirginiana. Plant Physiol.72:931-937.
  • Price, A.H., J.E. Cairns., P. Horton., H.G. Jones andH. Griffiths.2002. Linking drought-resistance mechanisms to drought avoidance in upland rice using a QTL approach: progress and new opportunities to integrate stomatal and mesophyll responses. J. Exp. Bot.53: 989–1004.
  • Ranney, T.G., R.E. Bir andW.A. Skroch. 1991. Comparative drought resistance among six species of birch (Betula): influence of mild water stress on water relations and leaf gas exchange. Tree Physiol. 8: 351–360.
  • Singh, B. andG. Singh. 2003. Biomass partitioning and gas exchange in Dalbergiasissoo seedlings under water stress. Photosynthetica.41: 407–414.
  • Zohary, D. andM. Hopf. 2000. Domestication of plants in the old world. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Wells, R.,D.A. Ashley andH.R. Boerma. 1986.Physiological comparisons of two soybean cultivars differing in canopy photosynthesis. II. Variation in Specific Leaf Weight,Nitrogen, and Protein Components. Photosynth. Res. 9:295-304.
Turkish Journal Of Field Crops-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-1111
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1996
  • Yayıncı: Tarla Bitkileri Bilimi Derneği