Mehmet SİNCİK, İlker NİZAM, İlknur AYAN, Celal YÜCEL, Mustafa AVCI, Uğur BİLGİLİ, Emin ANLARSAL, Hakan GEREN, Bilal AYDINOĞLU, Zeki ACAR, İsmail GÜL, A. Servet TEKELİ, Ayşen UZUN, Esvet AÇIKGÖZ, Ali ÜSTÜN, Mine YAVUZ, Sadık ÇAKMAKCI, Rıza AVCIOĞLU

Forage yield and lodging traits peas (Pisum sativum L.) with different leaf types

Two semi-leafless and four leafed pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes were evaluated for plant height, lodging scores, and forage yield in eight diverse locations with typical Mediterranean or Mediterranean-type climate in the 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 growing seasons. The genotypes used in this study were forage type with indeterminate growing habit. Significant differences among pea genotypes were found for all traits over years and locations. All interactions which related to G × E interaction showed significance (P>0.01) for all traits. The forage yield of the pea genotypes averaged 26605 kg ha-1 and the highest yield was obtained from the leafed genotype Urunlu. Its forage yield reached to 35970 kg ha-1 yield level at Samsun location.

PDF

___

Acikgoz, E., Ustun, A., Gul, I., Anlarsal, E., Tekeli, A.S., Nizam, I., Avcioglu, R., Geren, H., Cakmakci, S., Aydinoglu, B., Yucel, C., Avci, M., Acar, Z., Ayan, I., Uzun, A., Bilgili, U., Sincik M., and Yavuz, M. 2009. Genotype × environment interaction and stability analyis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Spanish J. Agr. Res. 7:96-106.
Armstrong, E.L., Pate, J.S. 1994. Field pea crop in SW Australia. Part I. Patterns of growth, biomass production and photosynthetic performance in genotypes of contrasting morphology. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 45, 1347–1362.
Biederbeck, V.O., Boudman, O.T., 1994. Water use by annual green manure legumes in dryland cropping system. Agron. J. 86, 543–549.
Cousin, R. 1997. Peas (Pisum sativum L.), Field Crop Res. 53 (1997), pp. 111-130.
Davies, D.R. 1977. Reconstructing the pea plant. Sci. Prog. Oxf. 64, 201-214.
Goldman, I.L., Gritton, E.T., Plannery, P.J. 1992. Evaluation of the Afila-tendriled Acacia (afaf-tactac) pea foliage type under high competition. Crop Sci. 32, 855–861.
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Jensen, E.S. 2001. Evaluating pea and barley cultivars for complementarity in intercropping at different levels of soil N availability. Field Crops Res. 28, 185–196.
Heath, M.C., Hebblethwaite, P.D. 1985. Agronomic Problems Associated with The Pea Crop. In: Heblethwaite, P.D., Heath, M.C., Dawkins, T.C.K. (Eds.), The Pea Crop, Butterworths, London, pp. 19-26.
Kilgore-Norwquest, L., Sneller, C.H. 2000. Effect of stem termination on soybean traits in Southern U.S. production system. Crop Sci. 40, 83–90.
Koivisto, J.M., Benjamin, L.R., Lane, G.P.F., and Davies, W.P. 2003. Forage potential of semi-leafless grain peas, Grass Forage Sci. 58 (2003), pp. 220–223.
Monti, L.M. 1983. Natural and induced variability in peas for protein production. In: Thompson, R., Casey, R. (Eds.). Perspectives for Peas and Lupins as Protein Crops. Martinus Nijhoff Publications, pp. 23-39.
Stelling, D. 1997. Dry peas (Pisum sativum L.) grown in mixtures with faba beans (Vicia faba L.). A rewarding cultivation alternative. J. Agron. and Crop Sci. 179, 65-74.
Uzun, A., Acikgoz, E. 1998. Effect of sowing season and seeding rate on the morphological traits and yields in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. J. Agron. and Crop Sci. 181, 215-222.
Uzun, A., Bilgili, U., Sincik, M., Acikgoz, E. 2005. Yield and quality performances of forage type pea strains contrasting leaf types. European J. Agron. 22, 85-94.