EFFECT OF WEED CONTROL METHODS ON HAY YIELD, BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND FORAGE QUALITY OF A MOUNTAIN PASTURE

EFFECT OF WEED CONTROL METHODS ON HAY YIELD, BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND FORAGE QUALITY OF A MOUNTAIN PASTURE

This research was conducted to determine the effect of control methods on the weed composition of a pasture located at high altitude zone of the Cukurova Region, Turkey. The experiment was designed as randomized complete block with three replicates for three years. The mowing, fertilization, applications of 2.4-D, Picloram+2.4-D, Paraquat and Glyphosate were studied as weed control methods. The highest dry matter yield was obtained from the Picloram+2.4-D treatments. Dry matter yields in all treatments were greater as compared to the control. Grass contribution to the hay yield in the Picloram+2.4-D application was statistically significant (P

___

  • Altin, M. 1992. Meadow-Range İmprovement. Trakya University Tekirdag Agriculture Faculty Press No: 152, Tekirdag
  • Altin, M. A. Gokkus, A. Koc, 2005. Range Development, TUGEM, 468 p. Ankara.
  • Anonymous, 2007. Chemical Analysis Results, University of Cukurova Laboratory of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Adana, Turkey.
  • Anonymous, 2012. Meteorological data for Adana, http://www.wunderground.com/q/zmw:00000.1.17350
  • Bovey, R.W. R.E. Meyer, L. Morton, 1972. Herbage Production Following Brush Control With Herbicides in Texas. Journal of Range Management, 22(5): 315-317
  • Buyukburc, U. 1991. A research on improvement of natural pasture in Karayav_an village of Polatlı town with different fertilizer types and levels. Cumhuriyet University, Agricultural Faculty of Tokat 8: 38.
  • Caddel, J. E. Allen, 2012. Forage quality interpretations, http://virtual.chapingo.mx/dona/paginaCBasicos/f-2117.pdf
  • Cinar, S. M. Avci, R. Hatipoglu, K. Kokten, I. Atis, T. Tukel, S.K. Aydemir, H. Yucel, 2005. Hanyeri village (TufanbeyliAdana) slope ceremonial part of the botanical composition of manure nitrogen and phosphorus, a study on the effects of forage yield and quality of grass, Turkey 6 Field Crops Congress, 5-9 September 2005, Antalya, Turkey, Volume II, p: 873-877.
  • Conrad, H.R. and F.A. Martz, 1985. Forages for dairy cattle, p: 550-559. In M.E. Heath et al., (ed) Forages: the science of grassland agriculture, 4 th ed. Iowa State University.
  • Darrell, L. W. Leon, 2005. Weed Control in Pasture&Range. College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences.Cooperative Extension Service. South Dakota State University.
  • Duzgunes, O. T. Kesici, O. Kavuncu, F. Gurbuz, 1987. Research and experimental methods, Ankara Univ. Agr. Fac. Publications, No: 295, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Ferrell, J.A. G.E. Macdonald, B.J. Brecke, J.J. Mullahey, T. Ducar, 2004. Weed Management in Pastures and Rangeland.SS-AGR-08 Agronomy Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.Website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wg006
  • Genckan, M.S. R. Avcioglu, H. Soya, O. Dogan, 1990. Problems and solutions of use, maintain and improvement of rangelands in Turkey. Turkey Agriculture Engineer III.Technical Congress 8-12 January 1990, pp. 53-61. Ankara
  • Grekul, C. W. Cole, D.E. Bork, 2005. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and Pasture Forage Responses to Wiping with Various Herbicides. Weed Technology 19(2) Lawrence. Weed Science Society of America, p: 298-306.
  • Gokkus, A. 1990. Effect of fertilizing, irrigation and grazing on chemical and botanical composition of meadows at Erzurum plain. Journal Agriculture Faculty, Ataturk University p: 21: 7-24.
  • Gokkus, A. A. Koc, 1995. Hay yield, botanical composition and useful hay content of meadows in relation to fertilizer and herbicide application. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry, 19: 23-29
  • Gokkus, A. A. Koc, 1996. Yield and botanical composition of grasslands at different times, the effects of different herbicides, Tr. J. Agric and Forestry, 20, 375-382.
  • Hatipoglu, R. M. Avci, N. Kilicalp, K. Kokten, S. Cinar, 2001. Research on the effects of phosphorus and nitrogen fertilization on the yield and quality of hay as well as the botanical composition of a pasture in the Cukurova region. Proceedings of 4th. Field Crops Congress, 17-21 September, Tekirdag University Press, Turkey pp.1-6.
  • Hatipoglu, R. M. Avci, S. Cinar, K. Kokten, I. Atis, T. Tukel, N. Kilicalp, C.Yucel, 2005. A research on effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on botanical composition, hay yield, and quality in humid part of Hanyeri Village rangeland (Tufanbeyli – Adana). Turkey VI. Field Crops Congress, September 5-9, pp. 867-872.
  • Hickman, M.V. C.G. Messersmith and R.G. Lym, 1990. Picloram release from leafy spurge roots. Journal of Range Management, 43(5):442-445.
  • Jacobs, J.S. and R.L.Sheley, 1999. Spotted knapweed, forbs and grass response to 2.4-D and N-fertilizer. Journal of Range Management, 52:482-488
  • Koc, A. 2000. Turkish Rangelands and Shrub Culture. Rangelands 22: 25-26.
  • Koc, A. B. Comakli, A. Gokkus, L. Tahtacioglu, 1994. The effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and ungrazed on plant density of Guzelyurt village in Erzurum. Proc. Turkey Field Crops Congress, Vol: Forage and Grassland, Izmir, pp: 78– 82
  • Linn, J. G.N.P. Martin, 1999. Forage quality tests and interpretations, http://extension.umn.edu/distribution/livestocksystems/ID26 37.html
  • Masters, B. J.Hanson, T.Gee, 2002. Pasture Weed Management. Dow AgroSciences, LLC 36309 State Hwy H,Graham, Missouri 64455.
  • Mc Daniel, K.C. and J.P. Taylor, 2003. Saltcedar recovery after Herbicide burn and mechanical clearing practices Journal of Range Management 56(5): 439-445.
  • Mut, H. İ. Ayan, Z. Acar, U. Basaran, O. Onal-Asci, 2010. The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland, Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15(2):198-203
  • Nichols, J.T. and W.E. Mc Murphy, 1969. Range Recovery and Production as İnfluenced by Nitrogen and 2,4-D Treatments. Journal of Range Management, p:116-119
  • Ozaslan, A. 1996. The effects of ripping, nitrogen and herbicide applications on improvement of vegetation in Erzurum pastures. Ataturk University, Department of Field Crops, (Master Thesis), Erzurum p. 54.
  • Passera, C.B. O. Borsetto, R.J. Candia and C.R. Stasi, 1992.
  • Shrub control and seeding influences on grazing capacity in Argentina. Journal of Range Management 45(5):480-482.
  • Pearson, C.J. and P.L. Ison, 1987. Agronomy of Grassland Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Roger, L.S. A.D. Celestine, B.H. Mary, S.J. James, 2000.
  • Spotted knapweed and grass response to herbicide treatments. Journal of Range Management. Society for Range Management. Volume 53:176-182 North Dakota University
  • Schroeder, J.W. 1994. Interpreting Forage Analysis. North Dakota State University NDSU Extension Service AS-1080.
  • Tanner, G.W. J.M. Wood, R.S. Kalmbacher and F.G. Martin, 1988. Mechanical shrub control on flatwoods range in South Florida. Journal of Range Management 41(3):245-248.
  • Vallentine, J.F. 1980 Range Development and Improvement, Brigham Young University Press, Provo, Utah. p: 357-358.
  • Van Soest, P.J. 1985. Composition, fiber quality, and nutritive value of forages. (E Heath, F Barnes, S Metcalfe eds.). Forages, Iowa State University Press, Iowa, s. 412-421.
Turkish Journal Of Field Crops-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-1111
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1996
  • Yayıncı: Tarla Bitkileri Bilimi Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

INDUCTION AND INHERITANCE OF COMPOUND LEAF AND CONE STIPULE IN THE CULTIVATED CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)

Cengiz TOKER, Fatma Oncu CEYLAN

THE SOIL SEED BANK PATTERN IN HIGHLAND RANGELANDS OF EASTERN ANATOLIAN REGION OF TURKEY UNDER DIFFERENT GRAZING SYSTEMS

M. Kerim GULLAP, H. Ibrahim ERKOVAN, Ali KOC

VARIATION AND CORRELATION OF MORPHO-AGRONOMIC TRAITS AND BIOCHEMICAL CONTENTS (PROTEIN AND Β-ODAP) IN TURKISH GRASS PEA (Lathyrus sativus L.) LANDRACES

Ugur BASARAN, Zeki ACAR, Atiye Nur ONAR, Meral KARACAN

CHICKPEA PERFORMANCE COMPARED TO PEA, BARLEY AND OAT IN CENTRAL EUROPE: GROWTH ANALYSIS AND YIELD

S. WİCHMANN, D. M. GİMPLİNGER, R. W. NEUGSCHWANDTNER, H. WAGENTRİSTL, H.-P. KAUL

CROP ASSORTMENT INDEX: A TOOL FOR MEASURING COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT FENUGREEK GENOTYPES

Beena NAİR, Krishan Pal SİNGH, Prem CHAND

THE EFFECT OF NATURAL GROWTH REGULATORS OBTAINED FROM Ecklonia maxima AND MINERAL NITROGEN ON TRUE PROTEIN AND SIMPLE SUGAR CONTENTS OF Dactylis glomerata L. AND Festulolium braunii (K. richt.) A. camus

Agnieszka GODLEWSKA, Gra?yna Anna CIEPIELA

Selahattin CINAR, Mustafa AVCI, Serap Kizil AYDEMIR

et al., Genotype–environment

Mehmet Salih SAYAR, Adem Emin ANLARSAL, Mehmet BASBAG

GENOTYPE–ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS AND STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR DRY-MATTER YIELD AND SEED YIELD IN HUNGARIAN VETCH (Vicia pannonica CRANTZ.)

Mehmet BASBAG, Mehmet Salih SAYAR, Adem Emin ANLARSAL

1Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Ermenek Vocational School, Karaman, TURKEY. 2Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Agricultural Faculty, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Kahramanmaras, TURKEY, 3Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Agricultural Faculty, Department of Agronomy, Kahramanmara

Hasan MARAL, Ziya DUMLUPINAR, Tevrican DOKUYUCU, Aydin AKKAYA