EFFECT OF LONG TERM CROP ROTATION AND FERTILISER APPLICATION ON MAIZE PRODUCTIVITY

EFFECT OF LONG TERM CROP ROTATION AND FERTILISER APPLICATION ON MAIZE PRODUCTIVITY

The effect of crop rotation and the application of fertilisers on maize yield were investigated in a 12-year study on the chernozem soil type at Zemun Polje, Serbia. The treatments included four cropping systems: continuous maize cropping (CS1); two crop rotation: maize - soybean (CS2) and maize - winter wheat (CS3), and three crop rotation maize - winter wheat - soybean (CS4) and the following fertilising treatments for maize: F1 - no fertiliser, F2 - 180 kg ha-1 NPK, F3 - 270 kg ha-1 NPK and F4 - 360 kg ha-1 NPK. The amount of applied nitrogen fertiliser in soybean was twice lower than in maize. The grain yield, on the average for all years, was the lowest (5.37 t ha-1) in continuous maize cropping. In a dominant type of the cropping system in Serbia (CS3), the maize grain yield was 6.82 t ha-1 and in CS2, was higher (7.60 t ha-1), even though the amount of nitrogen fertilisers applied, was lower by 50%. The highest average yield was obtained in CS4 (9.03 t ha-1). The application of fertilisers generally significantly influenced maize yield in comparison with control. These results favoured cropping systems with legumes preceded maize due to lower investments necessary to obtain higher yields

___

  • Adiku, S.G.D, J.W. Jones, F.K. Kumaga, A. Tonyigah. 2009.
  • Effects of crop rotation and fallow residue management on maize growth, yield and soil carbon in a savannah-forest transition zone in Ghana. Journal of Agricultural Sci, 147: 313-322.
  • Berzsenyi, Z., B., Gyorffy, D. Lap. 2000. Effects of crop rotation and fertilisation on maize and wheat yields and yield stability in a long-term. European Journal of Agronomy, 13: 225-244.
  • Carpenter-Boggs, L., L.J.Jr. Pikul, F.L. Vigil, E.W. Riedell. 2000. Soil nitrogen mineralization influenced by crop rotation and nitrogen ferilization. Soil Sci. Society of America Journal, 64: 2038-2045.
  • Carpici, B.E., N. Celik, B. Gamze. 2010. Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by plant density and nitrogen rate. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15: 128-132.
  • Idikut, L., S.N. Kara. 2011. The effect of previous plants and nitrogen rates on second crop corn. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16: 239-244.
  • Jovanović, Ž., G. Cvijanović, D. Kovačević. 2000a. Effects of precedings and mineral fertilisers on available content NPK nutritions in chernozem type soil. Proceedings of the I st Eco
  • Conference „Safe food―, September 27-30, Novi Sad, Serbia, 393-398.
  • Jovanović, Ž., Ž. Videnović, M. Vesković, B. Kresović, D. Kovačević. 2000b. Crop Rotations Effects in Biological Cropping Systems on Maize Yield. Proceedings of the 3 th International Crop Science Congress, August 17-22, Hamburg, Germany, 52.
  • Jovanović, Ž., M. Vesković, P. Jovin, D. Kovačević. 2004.
  • Effect of Different Growing Systems on Maize Yield According to The Concept of Sustainable Agriculture. Proceedings of the VIIIth ESA Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 611-612.
  • Kovačević, D., S. Oljača, Ž. Dolijanović, Ž. Jovanović, V. Milić. 2005. Influence of crop rotation on the yield of some important crops. International Conference TEMPO, October 6-8, Čačak, Serbia, 422-428. (In Serbian)
  • Kovačević, D. 2010. Crop Science. 1. ed. Faculty of Agriculture, Belgrade, Serbia, 771p. (In Serbian)
  • Melander, B., A.I. Rasmussen, P. Bàrberi. 2005. Integrating physical and cultural methods of weed control— examples from European research. Weed Science, 53: 369-381.
  • Nemecek, T., J.S. von Richthofen, G. Dubois, P. Casta, R. Charles, H. Pahl. 2008. Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations. European Journal of Agronomy, 21: 380-393.
  • Riedell, E. W., L.J.Jr. Pikul, A.A. Jaradat, E.T. Schumacher. 2009. Crop rotation and nitrogen input effects on soil fertility, maize mineral nutrition, yield, and seed composition. Agronomy Journal, 101: 870-879
  • Stranger, F.T., G.J. Lauer. 2008. Corn grain yield response to crop rotation and nitrogen over 35 years. Agronomy Journal, 100: 643-650.
  • Smith, G.R., L.K. Gross. 2006. Weed community and corn yield variability in diverse management systems. Weed Science, 54: 106-113.
  • Steel, R. G. D., J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, Second Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, USA.
  • Stefanović, L., M. Simić, B. Šinžar. 2011. Weed control in maize agroecosystem. 1. ed. Serbian Society of Genetics. Belgrade, Serbia, 678p.
  • Varvel, E.G. 2000. Crop rotation and nitrogen effects on normalized grain yields in a long-term study. Agronomy Journal, 92: 938-941.
  • Videnović, Ž., Ž. Jovanović, G. Cvijanović, L. Stefanović, M. Simić. 2007. The contribution of science to thedevelopment of contemporary maize growing practices in Serbia. In: Science as sustainable development background. Maize Research Institute „Zemun Polje―, Belgrade, Serbia, 267 – 285. (In Serbian)
  • Videnović Ž., M. Simić, J. Srdić, Z. Dumanović. 2011. Long term effects of different soil tillage systems on maize (Zea mays L.) yields. Plant, Soil and Environment, 57: 186-192.