EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS DOSES AND APPLICATION TIME ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF HAY AND BOTANICAL COMPOSITION OF CLOVER DOMINANT MEADOW IN HIGHLANDS OF TURKEY

EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS DOSES AND APPLICATION TIME ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF HAY AND BOTANICAL COMPOSITION OF CLOVER DOMINANT MEADOW IN HIGHLANDS OF TURKEY

This study was conducted at the Atatürk University’s farm in Erzurum over 2 years to evaluate the effects of phosphorus doses and application season on the dry matter production, botanical composition and crude protein, ADF and NDF content of an alsike clover-dominated natural hay meadow. The experiment was planned in a Randomized Complete Block Design with split-plot arrangement of application seasons (autumn and spring) was considered as a main plot and five phosphorus doses (0, 11, 22, 33 and 44 kg P ha-1) as subplots. P fertilization significantly affected the dry matter yield while the application season had no effect on dry matter yield. P application increased the legumes and decreased the other families’ percentage in the botanical composition, whereas it did not affect the grasses percentage. Due to the nature of alsike cover, the proportion of the legumes decreased and the proportion of grasses increased significantly in the second year. P application had no effect on the crude protein and ADF content of hay, while NDF content was affected by both doses and the season of P application. Depending on changes in botanical composition between years, the chemical content of the hay changed between years. The results indicate that P fertilizer has positive effects on dry matter production and no serious effect on the forage quality of meadows and there are no significant differences between autumn and spring application. Therefore, an 11 kg ha-1 application of P in the spring can be suggested for sustainable dry matter production in legumes-dominated natural hay meadows in highland areas

___

  • Aerts, R., H. de Coluwe and B. Beltman, 2003. Is the relation between nutrient supply and biodiversity co-determined by the type of nutrient limitation? Oikos 101: 489-498.
  • Altin, M., 1975. An Investigation on Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilization on Yield Crude Protein and Ash and Plant Composition of Natural Meadow and Rangeland. Atatürk University Publ. No: 326, Faculty of Agriculture Publ. No: 159.
  • Altin, M., A. Gokkus and A. Koc, 2005. Range and Meadow Improvement. Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Areas, Ankara.
  • Aydin, I. and F. Uzun, 2005. Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization of rangeland affect yield, forage quality and the botanical composition. Europ. J. Agron. 23: 8–14.
  • Ball, D.M., M. Collins, G.D. Lacefield, N.P. Martin, D.A Mertens,. K.E Olson, D.H. Putnam, D.J. Undersander and M.W. Wolf. 2001. Understanding Forage Quality. American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1- 01, Park Ridge, IL.
  • Barker, D.J. and M. Collins, 2003. Forage fertilization and nutrient management. In: Barnes RF, Miller DA, Nelson CJ, (ed.) Forages: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. 263-293, 6th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IO.
  • Beltman, B., J.H. Willems and S. Gusewell, 2007. Flood events overrule fertilizer effects on biomass production and species richness in riverine grasslands. J. Veget. Sci. 18: 625-634.
  • Benedycka, Z., S. Benedycki and S. Grzegorczyk, 1992. Phosphorus utilization in the dependence on nitrogen fertilization by greensward. Fourth International Imphos Conference, Phosphorus, Life and Environment, Gand, Belgium.
  • Budakli-Carpici, E., 2011. Changes in leaf area index, light interception, quality and dry matter yield of an abandoned rangeland as affected by the different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization. Turk. J. Field Crops. 16: 117-120.
  • Collins, M. and J.O. Fritz, 2003. Forge quality. In: Barnes RF, Miller DA, Nelson CJ, editors. Forages: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. 363-390. 6th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IO.
  • Connor, D.J., R.S. Loomis and K.G. Cassman, 2011. Crop Ecology: Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems. 546, Cambridge Press. New York.
  • Dasci, M. and B. Comakli, 2011. Effects of fertilization on forage yield and quality in range sites with different topographic structure. Turk. J. Field Crops. 16: 15-22.
  • Davies, A., 2001. Competition between grasses and legumes in established pastures. In: Tow PG, Lazenby A, editors.
  • Competition and Succession Pastures. Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, 63-83, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, UK.
  • Fageria, V.D., 2001. Nutrient interactions in crop plants. J. Plant Nutrition. 24: 1269-1290.
  • Gokkus, A., 1989. Effect of fertilizing, irrigation and grazing on hay and crude protein yields of meadows at Erzurum Plain. Turk. J. Agric. and For. 13: 1002–1020.
  • Gokkus, A., 1990. Effect of fertilizing, irrigation and grazing on chemical and botanical composition of meadows at Erzurum plain. Atatürk University J. Faculty of Agric. 21(2): 7-24.
  • Gokkus, A. and A. Koc, 1995. Hay yield, botanical composition and useful hay content of meadows in relation to fertilizer and herbicide application. Turk. J. Agric. and For. 19: 23-29.
  • Hatipoglu, R., M. Avcı, N. Kılıcalp, T. Tukel, K. Kokten and S. Cınar, 2001. Research on the effects of phosphorus and nitrogen fertilization on the yield and quality of hay as well as the botanical composition of a pasture in the Çukurova region. Proc. Turkish Field Crops Congress, 17-21 September 2001; Tekirdağ, pp. 1–6.
  • Henkin, Z., N.G. Seligman and I. Noy-Meir, 2010. Long-term productivity of mediterranean herbaceous vegetation after a single phosphorus application. J. Veget. Sci. 21: 979-991.
  • Jones, D.I.H., 1981. Chemical composition and nutritive value. In swart measurement handbook In: Handson J, Baker RD, Davies A, Laidlows AS, Leawer JD, editors. 243-265, The British Grassland Soc.
  • Kemp, P.D., L.M. Condron and C. Matthew, 2005. Pastures and soil fertility. In: White J, Hodgson J, editors. New Zealand Pasture and Crop Science. 67-82, Oxford Univ. Press, South Melbourne.
  • Koc, A. and A. Gokkus, 1998. Suggestions from previous studies for beter range and meadow management in eastern Anatolia region. Eastern Anatolia Agricultural Congress, 14- 18 September 1998; Erzurum. Vol: I pp. 419-428.
  • Koc, A., M. Dasci and H.I. Erkovan, 2005. Effect of fertilizer and cutting stage on hay yield and invasive plant density of meadow. Proc. Turkish Field Crops Congress, 5-9 September 2005; Antalya. pp. 863–866.
  • Koc, A., H.I. Erkovan and Y. Serin, 2008. Changes in vegetation and soil properties under semi-nomadic animal raising areas in highlands of Turkey. Current World Environment 3: 15- 20.
  • Marschner, H. and V. Romheld, 1983. In vivo measurement of root-induced pH changes at the soil–root interface: effect of plant species and nitrogen sources. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenernahr Bodenkunde 111: 241-251.
  • Mehrvarz, S. and M.R. Chaichi, 2008. Effect of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and phosphorus chemical fertilizer on forage and grain quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci. 3: 855-860.
  • Miller, D.A. and H.F. Reetz, 1995. Forage fertilization. Forages. Iowa State University Press, USA.
  • Papanastasis, V.P. and T.G. Papachristou, 2000. Agronomic aspect of forage legumes: management and forage quality. Legumes for Mediterranean Forage Crops, Pastures and Alternative Uses. Cahier Options Mediterraneennes, Ciheam, Zaragoza. pp. 113-126.
  • Pieper, R.D., R.J. Kelsey and A.B. Nelson, 1974 Nutritive quality of nitrogen fertilized and unfertilized blue grama. J. Range Manage. 27(6): 470-472.
  • Rayburn, E.D., 2004. Forage management, Understanding Forage Analysis Important to Livestock Producers. West Virginia Univ. Extension Service. http://www.wvu.edu/agexten/forglvst/analysis.pdf.
  • Russell, J.S., E.M. Brouse, H.F. Rhoades and D.F. Burzlaff, 1965. Response of sub-irrigated meadow vegetation to application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer. J. Range Manage. 18: 242-247.
  • Sigua, G.C., S.W. Coleman, J. Albano and M. Williams, 2011. Spatial distribution of soil phosphorus and herbage mass in beef cattle pastures: effects of slope aspect and position. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 89: 59-70.
  • Soil Survey Laboratory Staff, 1992. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. USDA-SCS. Soil Survey Investigations Report No: 42.
  • SPSS Inc, 1999. SPSS for Windows: Base 10.0 Applications Guide. Chicago, Illinois.
  • Tan, M. and O. Mentese, 2003. Effect of anatomic structure and chemical composition on forage quality. Atatürk University J.Faculty of Agric. 34: 97-103.
  • Townsend, C.E., 1985. Miscellaneous perennial clovers. In: Gibson RB, Gillett JW, Knight WE, Rupert EO, Smith RR,
  • Van Keuren RW editors. Clover Science and Technology. p: 563-578, American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Valentine, J.F., 1989. Range Development and Improvements. 3rd ed. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, California, p. 524.
  • van Gessel, T.P., 1970. Factors influencing the mineral content of herbage. Agri Digest 20: 35-41.
  • Van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3583-3597.
  • Venterink, H.O., 2011. Does phosphorus limitation promote species-rich plant communities? Plant Soil. 345: 1-9