INTEGRATED AHP-FMEA RISK ASSESSMENT METHOD TO STAINLESS TANK PRODUCTION PROCESS

INTEGRATED AHP-FMEA RISK ASSESSMENT METHOD TO STAINLESS TANK PRODUCTION PROCESS

This study aims to evaluate the hazards of the stainless tank production process in a company by using the Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) methods. First, the hazards in the stainless tank production process were identified. Identified hazards were assessed with the FMEA method to calculate Risk Priority Number (RPN) for each hazard. The same hazards were then weighted by using the AHP method. Finally, AHP and FMEA are integrated to achieve a more objective result by using two subjective methods. According to the integrated method results, risks have been prioritized and an objective ranking has been established for action plans.

___

  • Aran, G. (2006). Kalite iyileştirme sürecinde hata türü etkileri analizi (FMEA) ve bir uygulama (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Ceylan, H. (2000). İmalat Sistemlerindeki İş Kazalarının Tahmini İçin Ağırlıklandırılmış Ortalamalardan Sapma Tekniği. Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
  • Ceylan, H., & Başhelvacı, V. S. (2011). Risk değerlendirme tablosu yöntemi ile risk analizi: bir uygulama. Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma Ve Geliştirme Dergisi, 3(2), 25-33.
  • Ceylan, H., & Gül, T. S. (2015). Facts on safety at work for Turkey. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 2(5), 1192-1200.
  • Dey, P. K. (2010). Managing project risk using combined analytic hierarchy process and risk map. Applied Soft Computing, 10(4), 990-1000.
  • Eurostat, Statistics European Statistics on Accidents At Work ES, http://europa.eu.int/comm/eurostat [Accessed: 06.03.2020]
  • Goddard, P. L. (2000). Software FMEA techniques. In Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No. 00CH37055) (pp. 118- 123). IEEE.
  • ILO (International Labor Office), http://laborsta.ilo.org. [Accessed: 06.03.2020]
  • Korkmaz, A., & Avsallı, H. (2012). Çalışma hayatında yeni bir dönem: 6331 sayılı iş sağlığı ve güvenliği yasası. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2012(26), 153-167.
  • Kurt, M. (1993). İş Kazalarının Ergonomik Analizi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
  • Li, S., & Zeng, W. (2016). Risk analysis for the supplier selection problem using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(6), 1309-1321.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority. Resource allocation. RWS publications, USA.
  • Sivrikaya, B. T., & Ünal, E. (2018). AHP Grup Karar Verme Yöntemi ile Bilgi İşlem Çalişanlarinin Yetkinlik Temelli Performanslarinin Değerlendirmesi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 501-514.
  • Song, J. W., Yu, J. H., & Kim, C. D. (2007, September). Construction safety management using FMEA technique: Focusing on the cases of steel frame work. In 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference (pp. 3-5).
  • Wessiani, N. A., & Sarwoko, S. O. (2015). Risk analysis of poultry feed production using fuzzy FMEA. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 270-281.
  • Xu, K., Tang, L. C., Xie, M., Ho, S. L., & Zhu, M. L. (2002). Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 75(1), 17-29.
  • Yılmaz, B.S. (2000). Hata Türü ve Etkileri Analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(4), 133-150.