Towards an Ontology-based approach to the “new normality” after COVID-19: the Spanish case during pandemic first wave

Towards an Ontology-based approach to the “new normality” after COVID-19: the Spanish case during pandemic first wave

The impact of the pandemic caused by COVID-19 has been immense in all fields of human activity. In most of the affected countries, the authorities have decreed a series of legal measures to try to stop the growth of the disease and the number of people affected by it. These legal measures involved, in most cases, restrictions on the free movement of people and on work and trade activities, new hygiene procedures, and social distancing. In the particular case of Spain, the rapid evolution of the pandemic led to the declaration of a so-called state of alarm and a period of confinement in private homes. The novelty of the situation and the large number of official decrees approved may have led to confusion among the Spanish population in some cases. In this context, in this paper we present an ontological approach that could be the germ of a knowledge base on the measures approved by the Spanish Government in relation to the pandemic during the so-called first wave (March-June 2020). This ontology has been developed in OWL (Ontology Web Language) for its possible compatibility with semantic web-based applications and allows the consultation of statements related to various aspects of daily life during this period.

___

  • [1] Pileggi S, Lamia S. Climate change TimeLine: An ontology to tell the story so far. IEEE Access 2020; 8: 65294- 65312. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985112.
  • [2] Carrero O, García, F. Changes in Journalism during the state of alarm in Spain: The use of video in El País [Cambios en el Periodismo durante el estado de alarma en España: El uso del video en El País] . Estudios Sobre el Mensaje Periodistico 2021; 27 (1): 295-306 (in Spanish). doi: 10.5209/esmp.71302
  • [3] Ye J, Coyle L, Dobson S, Nixon P. Ontology-based models in pervasive computing systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 2007; 22 (4): 315-347. doi: 10.1017/S0269888907001208
  • [4] Leone V, Di Caro L, Villata S. Taking stock of legal ontologies: A feature-based comparative analysis. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2020; 28: 207-235. doi: 10.1007/s10506-019-09252-1
  • [5] Palmirani M. Akoma Ntoso for making FAO resolutions accessible. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 2019; 317: 159-169. doi: 10.3233/FAIA190018
  • [6] Boer A, Winkels R, Vitali F. Proposed XML standards for law: MetaLex and LKIF. In: 2007 Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference; Leiden, The Netherlands; 2007, pp. 19-28.
  • [7] De Martim H, Lima JADO, Araujo LC. Base of brazilian legal norms: An open government data initiative [base de normas jurídicas brasileiras: Uma iniciativa de open government data]. Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao 2018; 23 (4): 133-149 (in Portuguese). doi: 10.1590/1981-5344/3567
  • [8] Kurcheeva G, Rakhvalova M, Rakhvalova D, Bakaev M. Mining and indexing of legal natural language texts with domain and task ontology. In: Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science; St. Petersburg, Russia; 2019. pp. 123-137.
  • [9] Kondrashov I, Ivanov A, Zschage H, Pronin A, Sergo A et al. Legaltech i yuristy budushchego: kommentariiekspertov [Legaltech and the future lawyers: experts’ comments]. Law 2017; 11: 20-36 (in Russian).
  • [10] Gupta A, Wang AZ, Lin K, Hong H, Sun H et al. Toward building a legal knowledge-base of chinese judicial documents for large-scale analytics. In: Wyner A, Casini G. (editors). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol 302, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. 2017. pp. 135-144.
  • [11] Giord M. LexrideLaw: An argument based legal search engine. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law; London, UK; 2017. pp. 271-272.
  • [12] Mockus M, Palmirani M. Legal ontology for open government data mashups. In: 7th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2017; Danube University Krems, Austria; 2017. pp. 113-124.
  • [13] Castro AP, Calixto WP, Gomes VM, Veiga EF, Silva LFA et al. Ontology applied in the judicial sentences. In: 2017 CHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies, CHILECON 2017 ; Pucón, Chile; 2017. pp. 1-6.
  • [14] Rabinia A, Ghanavati S. The FOL-based legal-GRL (FLG) framework: Towards an automated goal modeling approach for regulations. In: 8th International Model-Driven Requirements Engineering Workshop, MoDRE 2018; Banff, AB, Canada; 2018. pp. 58-67.
  • [15] Geko M, Tjoa S. An ontology capturing the interdependence of the general data protection regulation (GDPR) and information security. In: CECC 2018 Central European Cybersecurity Conference; Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2018. pp. 1-6.
  • [16] Francesconi E, Governatori G. Legal compliance in a linked open data framework. In: Araszkiewicz M, RodríguezDoncel V (editors). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol 322, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. 2019. pp. 175-180.
  • [17] Leone V, Di Caro L. Frequent use cases extraction from legal texts in the data protection domain. In: Araszkiewicz M, Rodríguez-Doncel V (editors). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol 322, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. 2019. pp. 193-198.
  • [18] Soares AA, Martins PV, da Silva AR. LegalLanguage: A domain-specific language for legal contexts. In: Advances in Enterprise Engineering XIII 9th Enterprise Engineering Working Conference, EEWC 2019, Revised Papers, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing; Lisbon, Portugal; 2020. pp. 33-51.
  • [19] Palmirani M, Martoni M, Rossi A, Bartolini C, Robaldo L. PrOnto: Privacy ontology for legal reasoning. In: 7th International Conference, EGOVIS 2018; Regensburg, Germany; 2018. pp. 139-152.
  • [20] Boella G, Caro LD, Humphreys L, Robaldo L, Rossi P et al. Eunomos, a legal document and knowledge management system for the web to provide relevant, reliable and up-to-date information on the law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2016; 24 (3): 245-283. doi: 10.1007/s10506-016-9184-3
  • [21] Bartolini C, Muthuri R, Santos C. Using ontologies to model data protection requirements in workflows. In: JSAI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2015; Kanagawa, Japan; 2017. pp. 233-248.
  • [22] Chalkidis I, Nikolaou C, Soursos P, Koubarakis M. Modeling and querying greek legislation using semantic web technologies. In: European Semantic Web Conference ESWC 2017: The Semantic Web; Portorož, Slovenia; 2017. pp. 591-606.
  • [23] Waltl B, Reschenhofer T, Matthes F. Modeling, execution and analysis of formalized legal norms in model based decision structures. In: Pagallo U, Palmirani M, Casanovas P, Sartor G, Villata S (editors). AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. AICOL 2015, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2017, AICOL 2017, 2018, pp. 157-171.
  • [24] Fawei B, Wyner A, Pan JZ, Kollingbaum M. Using legal ontologies with rules for legal textual entailment. In: Pagallo U, Palmirani M, Casanovas P, Sartor G, Villata S (editors). AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. AICOL 2015, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2017, AICOL 2017, 2018, pp. 317-324.
  • [25] Maftuhah TS, Purwarianti A, Asnar YDW. Ontology modelling on legal document: Case study: Document of indonesian republic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. International Conference on Electronics Representation and Algorithm (ICERA 2019); 2019; 1201 (1). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1201/1/012061
  • [26] Markovich R. Understanding Hohfeld and formalizing legal rights: The Hohfeldian conceptions and their conditional consequences. Studia Logica 2020; 108 (1): 129-158. doi: /10.1007/s11225-019-09870-5
  • [27] Fernandez M, Overbeeke C, Sabou M, Motta E. What makes a good ontology? a case-study in fine-grained knowledge reuse. In: 4th Asian Conference on The Semantic Web 2009; Shanghai, China; 2009; pp. 61-75.
  • [28] González E, Piñeiro JD, Toledo J, Arnay R, Acosta L. An approach based on the ifcOWL ontology to support indoor navigation. Egyptian Informatics Journal 2021; 22 (1): 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eij.2020.02.008