Robust restoration of distribution systems considering DG units and direct load control programs

Robust restoration of distribution systems considering DG units and direct load control programs

This paper presents a new method for restoration of distribution networks after a fault occurrence. Thisproblem is solved from the viewpoint of the distribution system operator with the main goal of minimizing the operatingcost during the fault clearance period. The effects of distributed generation (DG) units and direct load control (DLC)programs are considered in designing the proposed restoration procedure. Moreover, the uncertainties associated withthe predicted loads of different nodes and the availability of DG are modeled here. Robust optimization is used to modelthe uncertainties of restoration problems and manage their associated risks. Finally, a robust reconfiguration plan isobtained solving a bilevel problem using a genetic algorithm (GA). The upper-level problem is concerned with evaluatingthe optimum configuration by GA and the lower-level problem obtains the optimum schedules of DG and DLC with anAC optimal power flow. A 32-bus test system is used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method.

___

  • Shirmohammadi D. Service restoration in distribution networks via network reconfiguration. IEEE T Power Deliver 1992; 7: 952-958.
  • Pérez-Guerrero R, Heydt GT, Jack NJ, Keel BK, Castelhano AR. Optimal restoration of distribution systems using dynamic programming. IEEE T Power Deliver 2008; 23: 1589-1596.
  • Cebrian JC, Rahman S, Kagan N. Restoration in distribution systems to reduce financial losses related to process trips. IEEE T Smart Grid. 2017; 8: 219-227.
  • Kumar Y, Das B, Sharma J. Multiobjective, multiconstraint service restoration of electric power distribution system with priority customers. IEEE T Power Deliver 2008; 23: 261-270.
  • Brown RE, Hanson AP. Impact of two-stage service restoration on distribution reliability. IEEE T Power Syst 2001; 16: 624-629.
  • Botea A, Rintanen J, Banerjee D. Optimal reconfiguration for supply restoration with informed A* search. IEEE T Smart Grid 2012; 3: 583-593.
  • Li J, Ma XY, Liu CC, Schneider KP. Distribution system restoration with microgrids using spanning tree search. IEEE T Power Syst 2014; 29: 3021-3029.
  • Dialynas EN, Michos DG. Interactive modeling of supply restoration procedures in distribution system operation. IEEE T Power Deliver 1989; 4: 1847-1854.
  • Chen CS, Wu JS, Moo CS. Fault restoration by optimizing switch configuration in distribution systems. J Chin Inst Eng 1989; 12: 781-789.
  • Riahinia S, Abbaspour A, Farzin H, Khalili S. A dynamic programing-based framework for distribution system restoration considering load uncertainties. Int T Electr Energy 2017 (in press).
  • Lim IH, Sidhu TS, Choi MS, Lee SJ, Hong S, Lim SI, Lee SW. Design and implementation of multiagent-based distributed restoration system in DAS. IEEE T Power Deliver 2013; 28: 585-593.
  • Arif A, Wang Z, Wang J, Chen C. Power distribution system outage management with co-optimization of repairs, reconfiguration, and DG dispatch. IEEE T Smart Grid 2017 (in press).
  • Kleinberg MR, Miu K, Chiang HD. Improving service restoration of power distribution systems through load curtailment of in-service customers. IEEE T Power Syst 2011; 26: 1110-1117.
  • Conejo AJ, Nogales FJ, Arroyo JM. Price-taker bidding strategy under price uncertainty. IEEE T Power Syst 2002; 17: 1081-1088.
  • Morales JM, Conejo AJ, Pérez-Ruiz J. Short-term trading for a wind power producer. IEEE T Power Syst 2010; 25: 554-564.
  • Duenas P, Reneses J, Barquin J. Dealing with multi-factor uncertainty in electricity markets by combining Monte Carlo simulation with spatial interpolation techniques. IET Genr Transm Dis 2011; 5: 323-331.
  • Ghazvini MA, Faria P, Ramos S, Morais H, Vale Z. Incentive-based demand response programs designed by assetlight retail electricity providers for the day-ahead market. Energy 2015; 82: 786-799.
  • Badakhshan S, Kazemi M, Ehsan M. Security constrained unit commitment with flexibility in natural gas transmission delivery. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2015; 27: 632-640.
  • Kazemi M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Ehsan M. IGDT based risk-constrained strategic bidding of GenCos considering bilateral contracts. In: 21st Iran Conference on Electrical Engineering; 14 May 2013; Mashhad, Iran. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-6.
  • Kazemi M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Ehsan M. Risk-based bidding of large electric utilities using information gap decision theory considering demand response. Electr Pow Syst Res 2014; 114: 86-92.
  • Wu L, Shahidehpour M, Li Z. Comparison of scenario-based and interval optimization approaches to stochastic SCUC. IEEE T Power Syst 2012; 27: 913-921.
  • Kazemi M, Zareipour H, Ehsan M, Rosehart WD. A robust linear approach for offering strategy of a hybrid electric energy company. IEEE T Power Syst 2017; 32: 1949-59.
  • Kazemi M, Zareipour H, Amjady N, Rosehart WD, Ehsan M. Operation scheduling of battery storage systems in joint energy and ancillary services markets. IEEE T Sustain Energ 2017; 8: 1726-1735.
  • Kazemi M, Zareipour H. Long-term scheduling of battery storage systems in energy and regulation markets considering battery’s lifespan. IEEE T Smart Grid 2017 (in press)
  • Kharrati S, Kazemi M, Ehsan M. Equilibria in the competitive retail electricity market considering uncertainty and risk management. Energy 2016; 106: 315-328.
  • Ghofrani-Jahromi Z, Kazemi M, Ehsan M. Distribution switches upgrade for loss reduction and reliability improvement. IEEE T Power Deliver 2015; 30: 684-692.
  • Dehghan S, Amjady N, Vatani B, Zareipour H. A new hybrid stochastic-robust optimization approach for selfscheduling of generation companies. Int T Electr Energy 2016; 26: 1244-1259.
  • Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sánchez CE, Thomas RJ. MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE T Power Syst. 2011; 26: 12-19.
  • Baran ME, Wu FF. Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing. IEEE T Power Deliver 1989; 4: 1401-1407.