Reducing power system model dimensions based on linearization for static analysis

Reducing power system model dimensions based on linearization for static analysis

A reliable solution for determining the effect of a group of contingencies on a power system is to simulateall of them through load flow. It is impossible to simulate any detailed cases through a complete AC load flow solutionbecause of the high number of possible contingencies. For this reason, system dimension reduction methods, which arebased on an equivalent of one part of a system, are being used. In this paper we compare our previously proposednetwork equivalent method with the 2 well-known equivalent methods of Ward and Ward-PV in terms of solving speedand accuracy. The proposed network equivalent method is based on linearization. In this method, first the networkis divided into 3 areas: internal, boundary, and external. Next, the equations of the external and boundary areas arelinearized and the external area equations are removed. By doing so, the number of equations is decreased and the speedof load flow solutions is increased. The simulations are applied on 14-, 30-, 39-, and 57-bus IEEE systems. The resultsof simulations show the effectiveness of our proposed method.

___

  • [1] Kim H, Jang G, Song K. Dynamic reduction of the large scale power systems using relation factor. IEEE T Power Syst 2004; 19: 1696-1699.
  • [2] Oliveira SEM, Queiroz J. Modal dynamic equivalent for electric power systems: Part I. IEEE T Power Syst 1988; 3: 1723-1730.
  • [3] Oliveira SEM, Massaud AG. Modal dynamic equivalent for electric power systems: Part II. IEEE T Power Syst 1988; 3: 1731-1737.
  • [4] Shayanfar A, Schlueter RA. Optimal modal coherent aggregation of dynamic equivalents for transient stability studies. IEEE T Power Syst 1984; PAS-103: 1662-1670.
  • [5] Lawler JS, Schlueter RA. Computational algorithms for constructing modal coherent dynamic equivalents. IEEE T Power Syst 1982; PAS-101: 1070-1080.
  • [6] Chow JH, Accari P, Price W. Inertial and slow coherency aggregation algorithms for power system dynamic model reduction. IEEE T Power Syst 1995; 10: 680-685.
  • [7] Lei X, Buchholz B, Ruhle O, Kulicke B, Menze A. Non-linear approaches for reducing large power systems. Int T Electr Energy 2001; 11: 153-162.
  • [8] Sturk C, Vanfretti L. Coherency independent structured model deduction of power system. IEEE T Power Syst 2014; 29: 2418-2426.
  • [9] Galarza RJ, Chow J, Price W, Hargrave AW, Hirsch PM. Aggregation of exciter models for constructing power system dynamic equivalents. IEEE T Power Syst 1998; 13: 782-788.
  • [10] Ashraf SM, Rathore B, Chakrabarti S. Performance analysis of static network reduction methods commonly used in power systems. In: Eighteenth National IEEE Power Systems Conference; 18-20 December 2014; Guwahati, India. New York, NY, USA; IEEE. pp. 1-6.
  • [11] Srivani J, Swarup KS. Power system static security assessment and evaluation using external system equivalents. Int J Elec Power 2008; 30: 83-92.
  • [12] Wu FF, Monticelli A. Critical review of external network modelling for online security analysis. IEEE T Power Syst 1983; 5: 222-235.
  • [13] Deckman S, Pizzolante A, Monticelli A, Stott B, Alsac O. Numerical testing of power system load flow equivalents. IEEE T Power Syst 1980; PAS-99: 2292-2300.
  • [14] Machowski J. External subsystem equivalent model for steady state and dynamic security assessment. IEEE T Power Syst 1988; 3: 1456-1462.
  • [15] Savulescu SC. Equivalents for security analysis of power systems. IEEE T Power Syst 1981; PAS-100: 2672-2682.
  • [16] Milano F, Srivastava K. Dynamic REI equivalents for short circuit and transient stability analyses. Electr Pow Syst Res 2009; 79: 878-887.
  • [17] Bergen AR. Power System Analysis. Delhi, India: Pearson Education India, 2009.
  • [18] Kazemi A, Jadid S, Andami H. A circuit based method for multi-area transmission networks loss allocation. Int T Electr Energy 2008; 18: 753-766.
  • [19] Popovic DP, Dobrijevic DM, Mijuskovic NA, Vlaisavljevic DJ. An advanced methodology for steady-state security assessment of power systems. Int T Electr Energy 2011, 11: 227-233.
  • [20] Karbalaei F, Shahbazi H. A quick method to solve the optimal coordinated voltage control problem based on reduction of system dimensions. Electr Pow Syst Res 2017; 142: 310-319.
  • [21] Karbalaei F, Shahbazi H, Mahdavi M. A new method for solving preventive security-constrained optimal power flow based on linear network compression. Int J Elec Power 2018; 96: 23-29.
  • [22] Phulpin Y, Begovic M, Petit M, Heyberger J, Ernst D. Evaulation of network equivalents for voltage optimization in multi-area power systems. IEEE T Power Syst 2009; 24: 729-743.