An efficient recurrent fuzzy CMAC model based on a dynamic-group–based hybrid evolutionary algorithm for identification and prediction applications

An efficient recurrent fuzzy CMAC model based on a dynamic-group–based hybrid evolutionary algorithm for identification and prediction applications

This article presents an efficient TSK-type recurrent fuzzy cerebellar model articulation controller (TRFCMAC) model based on a dynamic-group–based hybrid evolutionary algorithm (DGHEA) for solving identificationand prediction problems. The proposed T-RFCMAC model is based on the traditional CMAC model and the Takagi–Sugeno–Kang (TSK) parametric fuzzy inference system. Otherwise, the recurrent network, which imports feedbacklinks with a receptive field cell, is embedded in the T-RFCMAC model, and the feedback units are used as memoryelements. The DGHEA, which is a hybrid of the dynamic-group quantum particle swarm optimization (QPSO) andthe Nelder–Mead method, is proposed for adjusting the parameters of the T-RFCMAC model. In DGHEA, an entropybased grouping technique is adopted to improve the searching capability and the convergent speed of quantum particlesswarm optimization. Experimental results show that the proposed DGHEA-based T-RFCMAC model is more effectiveat identification and prediction than other models.

___

  • [1] Lee CH, Chang FY, Lin CM. An efficient interval type-2 fuzzy CMAC for chaos time-series prediction and synchronization. IEEE T Cybernetics 2010; 44: 329-341.
  • [2] Lin CJ, Chen CH, Lin CT. Efficient self-evolving evolutionary learning for neuro-fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2008; 16: 1476-1490.
  • [3] Lin CM, Li HY. TSK fuzzy CMAC-based robust adaptive backstepping control for uncertain nonlinear systems. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 2012; 1: 1147-1145.
  • [4] Lin CJ, Wu CF, Lin HY, Yu CY. An interactively recurrent functional neural fuzzy network with fuzzy differential evolution and its applications. Sains Malaysiana 2015; 44: 1721-1728.
  • [5] Juang CF, Chen JS. Water bath temperature control by a recurrent fuzzy controller and its FPGA implementation. IEEE T Ind Electron 2006; 53: 22-22.
  • [6] Albus JS. A new approach to manipulator control: the cerebellar model articulation controller (CMAC). J Dyn Sys Meas Control 1975; 97: 220-227.
  • [7] Albus JS. Data storage in the cerebellar model articulation controller (CMAC). J Dyn Sys Meas Control 1975; 97: 228-233.
  • [8] Dierks T, Jagannathan S. Neural network output feedback control of robot formations. IEEE T Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 2010; 40: 383-399.
  • [9] Yumtao D, Liu L, Zhao X. Modeling of nonlinear parameters on ship with fuzzy CMAC neural networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA); 20–23 June 2010; pp. 2070-2075.
  • [10] Azimi-Sadjadi MR, Gao W, Vonder Haar TH, Reinke D. Temporal updating scheme for probabilistic neural network with application to satellite cloud classification-further results. IEEE T Neural Netw 2001; 12:1196-203.
  • [11] Jou CC. A fuzzy cerebellar model articulation controller. In: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems; 8–12 March 1992; San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE. pp. 1171-1178.
  • [12] Lane SH, Handelman DA, Gelfand JJ. Theory and development of higher-order CMAC neural networks. IEEE Control Systems 1992; 12: 23-30.
  • [13] Lee HM, Chen CM, Chen JM, Jou YL. An efficient fuzzy classifier with feature selection based on fuzzy entropy. IEEE T Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 2001; 31: 426-432.
  • [14] Guo C, Ye Z, Sun Z, Sarkar P, Jamshidi M. A hybrid fuzzy cerebellar model articulation controller based autonomous controller. Comput Electric Eng 2002; 28: 1-16.
  • [15] Chen JY, A VSS-type FCMAC controller. In: The 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems; 2–5 December 2001; pp. 872-875.
  • [16] Chen CH, Lin CJ, Lin CT. A functional-link-based neuro-fuzzy network for nonlinear system control. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 2008; 16: 1362-1378.
  • [17] Tang A, Quek C, Ng G. GA-TSKfnn: parameters tuning of fuzzy neural network using genetic algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 2005; 29: 769-781.
  • [18] Ilonen J, Kamarainen JK, Lampinen J. Differential evolution training algorithm for feed-forward neural networks. J Neural Process Lett 2003; 17: 93-105.
  • [19] Hassanhosseini S, Taban MR, Abouei J. Indoor localization of wireless emitter using direct position determination and particle swarm optimization. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2018; 26: 655-665.
  • [20] Sun J, Feng B, Xu WB. Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior. In: IEEE Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation; 19–23 June 2004; pp. 325-331.
  • [21] Zhang A, Sun G, Wang Z, Yao Y. A hybrid genetic algorithm and gravitational search algorithm for global optimization. Neural Netw World 2015; 25: 53-73.
  • [22] Mohan VJ, Albert TAD. Particle swarm optimization guided genetic algorithm: A novel hybrid optimization algorithm. International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2017; 9: 628-634.
  • [23] Bertram AM, Zhang Q, Kong SC. A novel particle swarm and genetic algorithm hybrid method for diesel engine performance optimization. Int J Engine Res 2016; 17: 732-747.
  • [24] Idoumghar L, Melkemi M, Schott R, Aouad MI. Hybrid PSO-SA type algorithms for multimodal function optimization and reducing energy consumption in embedded systems. Appl Comput Intell Soft Comput 2011: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/138078.
  • [25] Abadin MFH, Rezaei H. A hybrid model of particle swarm optimization and continuous ant colony optimization for multimodal functions optimization. Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science 2015; 15: 108-119.
  • [26] Singh N, Singh S, Singh SB. A new hybrid MGBPSO-GSA variant for improving function optimization solution in search space. Evol Bioinform 2017; 13: DOI: http: 10.1177/1176934317699855.
  • [27] Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. J Comput 1965; 7: 308-313.
  • [28] Lin CJ, Lee CY. A novel parametric fuzzy CMAC network and its applications. J Appl Soft Comput 2009; 9: 775-785.
  • [29] Russo M. Genetic fuzzy learning. IEEE T Evol Comput 2000; 4: 259-273.
  • [30] Jang JSR. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE T Syst Man Cybern 1993; 23: 665-685.
  • [31] Kim D, Kim C. Forecasting time series with genetic fuzzy predictor ensemble. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 1997; 5: 523-535.
  • [32] Kasabov NK, Song Q. DENFIS: Dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system and its application for time-series prediction. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 2002; 10: 144-154.
  • [33] Juang CF, Lin JY, Lin CT. Genetic reinforcement learning through symbiotic evolution for fuzzy controller design. IEEE T Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 2000; 30: 290-302.
  • [34] Lin CJ, Chen CH, Lin CT. Efficient self-evolving evolutionary learning for neurofuzzy inference systems. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 2008; 16: 1476-1490.
  • [35] Elman JL. Finding structure in time. Cognit Sci 1990; 14: 179-211.
  • [36] Lee CH, Teng CC. Identification and control of dynamic systems using recurrent fuzzy neural networks. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 2000; 8: 349-366.
  • [37] Lin CJ, Chin CC. Prediction and identification using wavelet-based recurrent fuzzy neural networks. IEEE T Systems Man Cybern B Cybern 2004; 34: 2144-2154.
  • [38] Juang CF, Chiou CT, Lai CL. Hierarchical singleton-type recurrent neural fuzzy networks for noisy speech recognition. IEEE T Neural Netw 2007; 18: 833-843.
  • [39] Juang CF, Lin YY, Huang RB. Dynamic system modeling using a recurrent interval-valued fuzzy neural network and its hardware implementation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2011; 179: 83-99.