Probabilistic dynamic security assessment of large power systems using machine learning algorithms

Probabilistic dynamic security assessment of large power systems using machine learning algorithms

Due to extensive utilization of intermittent energy sources in recent years, deterministic approaches cannot provide an accurate security assessment for power systems under large uncertainties. Therefore, probabilistic approaches have become crucial for making decisions based on more reliable assessments. In this paper, a new method based on machine learning and proper sampling techniques is proposed to overcome the difficulties of the conventional Monte Carlo approaches used in power system security assessment. The main purpose of the proposed method is to accurately quantify the dynamic security related risk at a forecasted operating condition of a power system utilizing a large number of intermittent energy sources, e.g., wind, which greatly extends the uncertainties in its operation. This is achieved through the proposed method, which captures an accurate probability distribution of the system’s dynamic performance associated with both transient and small-signal angle stability. The accuracy of the fitted distribution is attained by adopting a generalized Pareto (GP) distribution for the left-tailed region that includes severe and rare cases using a multilayered perceptron neural network with the Relief feature selection technique, which speeds up the exceedance sample generation process required for the GP distribution. The Latin hypercube sampling technique, which samples the search space evenly, is proposed to create a dataset for training the neural network. To generate the Monte Carlo instances, the Gibbs sampling approach, which considers the correlation between random variables besides its simplicity, is utilized.

___

  • MATLAB 9.0, The MathWorks Inc. Natick, MA, USA, 2016.
  • Zimmerman RD, Murillo-S´anchez CE, Thomas RJ. MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE T Power Syst 2011; 26: 12-19.
  • DSATools TM , (Version 14) [Computer software]. Surrey, BC, Canada.
  • Rogers G. Power System Oscillations. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
  • Pickands III J. Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Ann Stat 1975; 1: 119-131.
  • Smith AF, Roberts GO. Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. J Royal Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1993; 1: 3-23.
  • Driels MR, Shin YS. Determining the number of iterations for Monte Carlo simulations of weapon effectiveness.Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA 2004.
  • Kira K, Rendell LA. The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm. In: AAAI’92 Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 12–16 July 1992; San Jose, CA, USA.Vol 2: pp. 129-134.
  • Rosenblatt F. Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptions and the Theory of Brain Mechanism. Washington, DC, USA: Spartan Books, 1961.
  • Stein M, Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics 1987; 29: 143-151.
  • Preece R, Milanovi´c JV. Efficient estimation of the probability of small-disturbance instability of large uncertain power systems. IEEE T Power Syst 2016; 31: 1063-1072.
  • Preece R, Woolley NC, Milanovi´c JV. The probabilistic collocation method for power-system damping and voltage collapse studies in the presence of uncertainties. IEEE T Power Syst 2013; 28: 2253-2262.
  • Verbic G, Canizares CA. Probabilistic optimal power flow in electricity markets based on a two-point estimate method. IEEE T Power Syst 2006; 21: 1883-1893.
  • Ming D, Renching D, Yacheng L. Monte-Carlo simulation approach to probability stability. Journal of Tsinghua University 1999; 3: 79-83.
  • Billinton R, Kuruganty PR. Probabilistic assessment of transient stability in a practical multimachine system. IEEE T Power App Syst 1981; 7: 3634-3641.
  • Wu FF, Tsai YK, Yu YX. Probabilistic steady-state and dynamic security assessment. IEEE T Power Syst 1988; 3: 1-9.
  • Wu F, Tsai YK. Probabilistic dynamic security assessment of power systems-I: Basic model. IEEE T Circuits Syst 1983; 30: 148-159.
  • Rueda JL, Erlich I. Probabilistic framework for risk analysis of power system small-signal stability. Proc Institution Mech Eng O 2012; 226: 118-133.
  • Rueda JL, Colom´e DG, Erlich I. Assessment and enhancement of small signal stability considering uncertainties.IEEE T Power Syst 2009; 24: 198-207.
  • Wang D, Yu Y, Fu C, Zhang J, Wu J, Jia H, Chen X. Security region based probabilistic security assessment of power transmission system basic concepts. In: IEEE 2005 Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition: Asia and Pacific: IEEE/PES. pp. 1-5.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK