Gökmen MAHMUTYAZICIOĞLU, Mustafa Kemal ÖZGÖREN, Bülent OZKAN

Performance comparison of the notable acceleration- and angle-based guidance laws for a short-range air-to-surface missile

Short-range air-to-surface missiles have become globally popular in the last two decades. As a performance driver, the type of guidance law gains importance. In this study, proportional navigation, velocity pursuit, and augmented proportional navigation guidance laws, whose resulting guidance commands take the form of lateral acceleration, are applied to a short-range air-to-surface missile against both stationary and maneuvering ground targets. Body pursuit and linear homing guidance laws, which yield angular commands, are additionally applied. Having completed the relevant computer simulations, we conclude that none of the acceleration- and angle-based guidance laws are absolutely superior to the others.

PDF

___

[1] Zarchan P. Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance. 1st ed. Washington, DC, USA: AIAA, 1994.
[2] Zarchan P. Ballistic missile defense guidance and control issues. Sci Gl Sec 1998; 8: 99-124.
[3] Yang CD, Hsiao FB, Yeh FB. Generalized guidance law for homing missiles. IEEE T Aerosp Electron Syst 1989: 25: 197-212.
[4] Ozkan B. Dynamic modeling, guidance, and control of homing missiles. PhD, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2005.
[5] Ozkan B, Ozg Oren MK, Mahmutyazcoglu C. Investigation of the performance of the single- and two-part missiles against moving surface targets In: 2007 National Meeting of Automatic Control; 1315 June 2007; Sabanc University, _ Istanbul, Turkey. (article in Turkish with an abstract in English).
[6] Lin CF. Modern Navigation, Guidance and Control Processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1991.
[7] Ozkan B, Ozg Oren MK, Mahmutyazcoglu G. Notable guidance methods that can be applied to homing missiles. In: 2008 Defence Technologies Congress; 2731 July 2008; Ankara, Turkey (article in Turkish with an abstract in English).
[8] Blakelock JH. Automatic Control of Aircraft and Missiles. 1st ed. Somerset, NJ, USA: Wiley, 1965.
[9] Ozkan B, Ozg Oren MK, Mahmutyazcoglu G. Guidance and control of two-part homing missiles using the propor- tional navigation guidance law. In: AIAA 2008 Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit; 1821 August 2008; Honolulu, HI, USA. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA.
[10] Sahin KD. A pursuit evasion game between an aircraft and a missile. MSc, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2002.
[11] Berglund E. Guidance and control technology. In: RTO SCI 2000 Lecture Series on Technologies for Future Precision Strike Missile Systems; 2324 March 2000; Atlanta, GA, USA. pp. 1-10.
[12] Ozg Oren MK. Some remarks on rotation sequences and associated angular velocities. J Mech Mach Theory 1994; 29: 933-940.
[13] Budiyoo A, Rachman H. Proportional guidance and CDM control synthesis for a short-range homing surface-to-air missile. J Aerosp Eng 2012; 25: 168-177.
[14] Ozkan B, Ozg Oren MK, Mahmutyazcoglu G. Implementation of linear homing guidance law on a two-part homing missile. In: IFAC 2008 World Congress; 611 July 2008; Seoul, Korea. New York, NY, USA: IFAC. pp. 13999-14004.
[15] Ozkan B, Ozg Oren MK, Mahmutyazcoglu G. Comparison of the acceleration- and angle-based guidance laws for a short-range air-to-surface missile. IFAC Proc 2011; 44: 3527-3532.
[16] Ma K, Khalil HK, Yao Y. Guidance law implementation with performance recovery using an extended high-gain observer. Aerosp Sci Technol 2013; 24: 177-186.
[17] Li GL, Yan H, Ji HB. A guidance law with nite time convergence considering autopilot dynamics and uncertainties. Int J Control Autom Syst 2014; 12: 1011-1017.
[18] Kada B. Arbitrary-order sliding-mode-based homing-missile guidance for intercepting highly maneuverable targets. J Guid Control Dynam 2014; 37: 1999-2013.
[19] Laser Seeker System Workshop. Martin Marietta Training Notes, 1993.