Modelling sensor ontology with the SOSA/SSN frameworks: a case study for laboratory parameters

Modelling sensor ontology with the SOSA/SSN frameworks: a case study for laboratory parameters

Recently, the use of sensor-based systems in many areas has led to an exponential increase in the raw sensor data. However, the lack of neither syntactic nor semantic integrity between these sensor data limited their sharing, reusability, and interpretation. These inabilities can cause some problems. For example, different wireless sensor networks may not work together due to the subtle variations in their sensing methods, operating systems, syntax, and data structure. In recent years, to cope with these inabilities, the semantic sensor web approach, which enables us to enrich the meaning of sensor data, has been seen as the critical technology in solving these problems by some researchers. The primary purpose of this study is to create a laboratory environment parameters sensor ontology (LEPSO) that provides a standard data model for heterogeneous sensor data from different platforms by expanding semantic sensor networks (SSN). A case study was conducted using the real-time data collected from Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Scientific Industrial Technological Application and Research Center in order to demonstrate that the proposed LEPSO can be used in similar sensor-based applications. A series of semantic queries have been performed on the collected sensor data to evaluate the proposed sensor ontology. The results showed that sensor data, which are heterogeneous by nature, provide benefit results in sensor-based monitoring systems when enriched with semantic web technologies and ontologies. Besides, this study proves that the proposed semantic sensor ontology, which used the semantic sensor network framework, has the capability to provide a common infrastructure for many sensor-based applications. The proposed ontology has the potential to become a more comprehensive ontology by adding different platforms, different sensors, different environments such as school, factory. In the next study, it is aimed to expand the scope of this semantic sensor network, which is formed by including this ontology in the intensive care unit of a hospital.

___

  • [1] Sheth A, Henson C, Sahoo SS. Semantic sensor web. IEEE Internet Computing 2008; 12 (4): 78-83. doi: 10.1109/MIC.2008.87
  • [2] Janowicz K, Bröring A, Stasch C, Everding T. Towards meaningful URIs for linked sensor data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop Towards Digital Earth: Search, Discover and Share Geospatial Data; Berlin, Germany; 2010. pp. 1-20.
  • [3] Le-Phuoc D, Hauswirth M. Linked open data in sensor data mashups. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks; Washington DC, USA; 2009. pp. 1-16.
  • [4] Barnaghi P, Presser M. Publishing linked sensor data. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Semantic Sensor Networks; Shanghai, China; 2010. pp. 1-16.
  • [5] Bröring A, Echterhoff J, Jirka S, Simonis I, Everding T et al. New generation sensor web enablement. Sensors 2011; 11 (3): 2652-2699. doi: 10.3390/s110302652
  • [6] Avancha S, Patel C, Joshi A. Ontology-driven adaptive sensor networks. In: Proceedings of 1st Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services; Boston, USA; 2004. pp. 194-202. doi: 10.1109/MOBIQ 2004.1331726
  • [7] Tarek MB,Payam E, Kerry B. IoT-Lite: a lightweight semantic model for the internet of things and its use with dynamic semantics. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2017; 21 (3): 475-487. doi: 10.1007/s00779- 017-1010-8
  • [8] Jin W, Kim DH. Design and implementation of e-health system based on semantic sensor network using IETF YANG. Sensors 2018; 18 (2): 629-648. doi: 10.3390/s18020629
  • [9] Ali S, Khusro S, Ullah I, Khan A, Khan I. SmartOntoSensor:Ontology for semantic interpretation of smartphone sensors data for context-aware applications. Journal of Sensors 2017; 1: 1-26. doi: 10.1155/2017/8790198
  • [10] Wang C, Chen Z, Chen N, Wang W. A hydrological sensor web ontology based on the SSN ontology: a case study for a flood. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2018; 7 (2): 1-15. doi: 10.3390/ijgi7010002
  • 11] Kuster C, Hippolyte J, Rezgui Y. The UDSA ontology: An ontology to support real time urban sustainability assessment. Advances in Engineering Software 2020; 140 (1): 102731-102747. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.102731
  • [12] Botts M, Percivall G, Reed C, Davidson J. OGC sensor web enablement: Overview and high level architecture. In: 2nd International GSN Conference Selected Topics in GeoSensor Networks; Berlin, Germany; 2008. pp. 175-190. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79996-2-10
  • [13] Compton M, Barnaghi P, Bermudez L, Castrod RG, Corcho O et al. The SSN ontology of the semantic sensor networks incubator group. Journal of Web Semantics 2012; 12 (1): 25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2012.05.003
  • [14] Arooj M, Asif M, Zeeshan S. Modeling smart agriculture using SensorML. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 2017; 8 (5): 1-6. doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080562
  • [15] Barnaghi P, Compton M, Corcho O, Castro RG, Graybeal J et al. Semantic Sensor Network XG Final Report, 2011.
  • [16] Sequeda J, Corcho O. Linked stream data a position paper linked stream data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Semantic Sensor Networks; Washington DC, USA; 2009. pp. 148-157.
  • [17] Patni HK, Henson CA, Sheth AP. Linked sensor data. In: Proceedings of 2010 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems; Illinois, USA; 2010. pp. 362-370.
  • [18] Janowicz K, Compton M. The stimulus-sensor-observation ontology design pattern and its integration into the semantic sensor network ontology. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Semantic Sensor Networks; Shanghai, China; 2010. pp. 64-78.
  • [19] Musen MA. The Protégé project: A look back and a look forward. Artificial Intelligence Matters 2015; 1 (4): 4-12. doi: 10.1145/2757001.2757003
  • [20] Calbimonte J, Jeung H, Corcho O, Aberer K. Enabling query technologies for the semantic sensor web. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 2012; 8 (1): 43-63. doi: 10.4018/jswis.2012010103
  • [21] Krzyzanowski M, Cohen A. Update of World Health Organization air quality guidelines. International Journal on Air Quality Atmosphere Health 2008; 1 (1): 7-13. doi: 10.1007/s11869-008-0008-9
  • [22] Qiu H, Yu ITS, Tian L, Wang X, Tse LA et al. Effects of coarse particulate matter on emergency hospital admissions for respiratory diseases: A time-series analysis in Hong Kong. Environmental Health Perspectives 2012; 120 (4): 572-576. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104002
  • [23] Westphal M, Ylä-Herttuala S, Martin J, Warnke P, Menei P et al. Adenovirus-mediated gene therapy with sitima- gene ceradenovec followed by intravenous ganciclovir for patients with operable high-grade glioma (ASPECT): a ran- domised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2013; 14 (9): 823-833. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70274-2
  • [24] Janssen NAH, Fischer P, Marra M, Ameling C, Cassee FR. Short-term effects of PM2.5, PM10 and PM2.5- 10 on daily mortality in the Netherlands. Science of the Total Environment 2013; 463-464: 20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.062
  • [25] Strandberg-larsen K, Gronbcek M, Andersen AN, Andersen PK. Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article-original article alcohol drinking pattern during pregnancy and risk of infant mortality. JSTOR Epidemiology 2016; 20 (6): 884-891. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181bbd46c
  • [26] Feng C, Li J, Sun W, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Impact of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure on the risk of influenza-like-illness: A time-series analysis in Beijing, China. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 2016; 15 (1): 1-12. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0115-2
  • [27] Krawczyk DA, Rodero A, Gładyszewska-Fiedoruk K, Gajewski A. CO2 concentration in naturally ventilated classrooms located in different climates—measurements and simulations. Energy and Buildings Journal 2016; 129 (1): 491-498. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.003
  • [28] Stanke DA, Danks RA, Muller CO, Hedrick RL, Fisher FJ et al. Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Report, 2017.
  • 29] Hussin M, Ismail MR, Ahmad MS. Air-conditioned university laboratories: Comparing CO2 measurement for centralized and split-unit systems. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences 2017; 29 (2): 191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2014.08.005
  • [30] Zahangeer Alam M, Armin E, Haque MM, Halsey J, Qayum MA. Air pollutants and their possible health effects at different locations in Dhaka City. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources 2018; 9 (4): 1-12. doi: 10.19080/IJESNR.2018.09.555768
  • [31] Brown S. High quality indoor environments for sustainable office buildings. Grey ARCTIC Journal 2008; 1: 1-12.
  • [32] WHO, World Health Organization guidelines for air quality-selected pollutants, 2010. ISBN 978 92 890 0213 4.
  • [33] Wilbur S, Williams M, Williams R, Scinicariello F, Klotzbach Julie M et al. Toxicological profile for carbon monoxide. Atlanta, GA, USA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2012