Error sources and measurement uncertainties in outdoor testing of BIPV modules

Error sources and measurement uncertainties in outdoor testing of BIPV modules

Although building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems have great potential, investment in this field is not at the desired level. There are two main reasons for this: the lack of technical analysis and economic reasons. Manufacturers and investors utilize datasheets of modules to determine the systems performance, which is determined at standard test conditions (STCs). However, there are apparent differences between STCs and outdoor measurements. Most studies in the field of BIPV system analysis have only focused on long-term outdoor measurements. Besides that, uncertainty of measurements is necessary to achieve scientific results. The aim of this study is to emphasize the importance of measurement uncertainty, to describe how measurement uncertainties are calculated, and to find out the uncertainty of an outdoor BIPV measuring system. In this study, different roof-integrated photovoltaic systems with 15 ◦ ,30 ◦, and 45 ◦ inclination angles were tested in the Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology measurement field. Maximum power point current, voltage, power, and temperature of each system were mea

___

  • [1] Din VDE. Photovoltaic in Building. Berlin, Germany: Deutsche Kommission Elektrotechnik Elektronik Informationstechnik im DIN und VDE 0126-21, 2007.
  • [2] EU Sunrise Project. Barriers for the Introduction of Photovoltaics in the Building Sector. Brussels, Belgium: EU Sunrise Project, 2008.
  • [3] Misara S. Thermal impacts on building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) electrical, thermal and mechanical characteristics. PhD, Fraunhofer IWES, Kassel, Germany, 2014.
  • [4] Mei L, Infield DG, Gottschalg R, Loveday DL, Davies D, Berry M. Equilibrium thermal characteristics of a building integrated photovoltaic tiled roof. Sol Energy 2009; 83: 1893-1901.
  • [5] UKAS. The Expression of Uncertainty in EMC Testing. London, UK: United Kingdom Accreditation Service, 2002.
  • [6] Wells C. Measurement Uncertainty Analysis Techniques Applied to PV Performance Measurement. Golden, CO, USA: National Energy Laboratory, 1992.
  • [7] Hibbert DB. Systematic errors in analytical measurement results. J Chromatogr A 2007; 1158: 25-32.
  • [8] JCGM. Evaluation of Measurement Data-Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Paris, France: Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008.
  • [9] Henze N, Funtan P, Misara S, Roos M. PV-Indach-Systeme im outdoor-test elektrische, mechaniche und termische vermessungen. In: 5. Forum Bauwerkintegrierte Photovoltaik Forum; 5 March 2013; Bad Staffelstein, Germany. pp. 1-5.
  • [10] Glotzbach T, Kirchhof J. Novel measuring system for long term evaluation of photovoltaic modules. In: 24th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference; 21–25 September 2009, Hamburg, Germany. pp. 3660-3663.
  • [11] Chien YJ. Evaluation of building integrated of photovoltaic (BIPV) panels on electrical and thermal characteristics for in-roof systems. MSc, Fraunhofer IWES, Kassel, Germany, 2013.
  • [12] Firges J, Funtan P, Henze N, Roos M, Misara S. PV roof integrated systems vs. best and worst cases: novel measurement for long term outdoor measurement of PV roof integrated systems (electrical, thermal and mechanical behaviors). In: 28th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition; 30 September–4 October 2013; Paris, France. pp. 3445-3451.
  • [13] King DL, Boyson WE, Kratochvil JA. Photovoltaic Array Performance Model. Albuquerque, NM, USA: Sandia National Laboratories, 2004.
  • [14] D’Orazio M, Perna CD, Giuseppe ED. Experimental operating cell temperature assessment of BIPV with different installation configurations on roof under Mediterranean climate. Renew Energ 2014; 68: 378-396.
  • [15] Atmaram GH. Uncertainty estimate of photovoltaic module power rating for outdoor testing. In: IEEE 4th World Photovoltaic Energy Conversion Conference; 7–12 May 2006; Waikoloa, HI, USA. pp. 2124-2128.
  • [16] Taylor BN, Kuyatt CE. Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: United States Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994.
  • [17] Bell S. A Beginner’s Guide to Uncertainty of Measurement. London, UK: National Physical Laboratory, 2001.
  • [18] M¨ullejans H, Zaaiman W, Galleano R. Analysis and mitigation of measurement uncertainties in the traceability chain for the calibration of photovoltaic devices. Meas Sci Technol 2009; 20: 1-12.
  • [19] EA. Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration. Brussels, Belgium: European Cooperation for Accreditation, 2013.
  • [20] Taylor JR. An Introduction to Error Analysis-The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements. Sausalito, CA, USA: University Sciences Books, 1997.
  • [21] Whitfield K, Osterwald CR. Procedure for determining the uncertainty of photovoltaic module outdoor electrical performance. Prog Photovoltaics 2001; 9: 87-102.
  • [22] Liu H. Power rating uncertainty analysis of electrical performance of photovoltaic modules. In: IEEE 2012 Innovative Smart Grid Technologies; 21–24 May 2012; Tianjin, China. pp. 1-4.
  • [23] Klevens J. Calibrating DC Current Shunts: Techniques and Uncertainties. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: LABS Excellence in Resistance, Ohm-Labs Inc., 2011.
  • [24] Scheller G. Error Analysis of a Temperature Measurement System with Worked Examples. Fulda, Germany: JUMO GmbH & Co. KG, 2003.
  • [25] Tavener JP. Changes to the international standard for industrial PRT’s. In: Test and Measurement Conference; 7–10 November 2010; Drakensberg, South Africa.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK