Concurrent optimal design of TCSC and PSS using symbiotic organisms search algorithm

Concurrent optimal design of TCSC and PSS using symbiotic organisms search algorithm

The symbiotic organisms search (SOS), which has been recently introduced, is a robust powerful metaheuristic global optimizer. This nature-inspired algorithm imitates the symbiotic interaction strategies in an ecosystem exercised by organisms involved in interrelationships to survive and reproduce. One of the main bene cial features of the SOS in contrast to many other competent metaheuristic algorithms is that the algorithm does not need any speci c algorithm parameters or tuning process. This paper applies the SOS algorithm to simultaneously design optimal controllers of a power system equipped with both a power system stabilizer (PSS) and a thyristor-controlled series compensator (TCSC). The algorithm of SOS is utilized to concurrently tune the variables of controllers for both the PSS and TCSC in the nonlinear optimization process. Simulation results reveal that the optimal SOS-based coordinated controllers can signi cantly stabilize the system and efficiently damp oscillations under severe disturbances. Results will also show that the optimal controllers obtained perform slightly better than the optimal controllers obtained using the two commonly used global optimization solvers, the genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization.

___

  • [1] Kundur P. Power System Stability and Control. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  • [2] Larsen EV, Swann DA. Applying power system stabilizers part I: general concepts. IEEE T Power Ap Syst 1981; 100: 3017-3024.
  • [3] Bhattacharya K, Nanda J, Kothari ML. Optimization and performance analysis of conventional power system stabilizers. Int J Elec Power 1997; 19: 449-458.
  • [4] Hariri A, Malik OP. A fuzzy logic based power system stabilizer with learning ability. IEEE T Energy Conver 1996; 11: 721-727.
  • [5] Segal R, Kothari ML, Madnani S. Radial basis function (RBF) network adaptive power system stabilizer. IEEE T Power Syst 2000; 15: 722-727.
  • [6] Abido MA. Robust design of multi-machine power system stabilizers using simulated annealing. IEEE T Energy Conver 2000; 15: 297-304.
  • [7] Do Bom m ALB, Taranto GN, Falcao DM. Simultaneous tuning of power system damping controllers using genetic algorithms. IEEE T Power Syst 2000; 15: 163-169.
  • [8] Abido MA, Abdel-Magid YL. Optimal design of power system stabilizers using evolutionary programming. IEEE T Energy Conver 2002; 17: 429-436. [9]3919 Abido MA. Optimal design of power-system stabilizers using particle swarm optimization. IEEE T Energy Conver 2002; 17: 406-413.
  • [10] Zhao Q, Jian J. Robust controller design for generator excitation systems. IEEE T Energy Conver 1995; 10: 201-209.
  • [11] Chen GP, Malik OP, Qin YH, Xu GY. Optimization technique for the design of a linear optimal power system stabilizer. IEEE T Energy Conver 1992; 7: 453-459.
  • [12] Hossenizadeh N, Kalam A. A rule based fuzzy power system stabilizer tuned by a neural network. IEEE T Energy Conver 1999; 14: 773-779.
  • [13] Hingoran NG, Gyugyi L. Understanding FACTS Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems. New Jersey, NJ, USA: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2000.
  • [14] Noroozian M, Angquist L, Ghandhari M, Anderson G. Improving power system dynamics by series-connected FACTS devices. IEEE T Power Deliver 1997; 12: 1635-1641.
  • [15] Paserba JJ, Miller NW, Larsen EV, Piwko RJ. A thyristor controlled series compensation model for power system stability analysis. IEEE T Power Delver 1995; 10: 1471-1478.
  • [16] Del Rosso AD, Canizares CA, Dona VM. A study of TCSC controller design for power system stability improvement. IEEE T Power Syst 2003; 18: 1487-1496.
  • [17] Panda S, Patel RN, Padhy NP. Power system stability improvement by TCSC controller employing a multi-objective genetic algorithm approach. Int J Int Tech 2006; 1: 266-273.
  • [18] Panda S, Padhy NP. Thyristor controlled series compensator based controller design employing genetic algorithm: a comparative study. Int J Electr Circ Syst 2007; 1: 38-47.
  • [19] Abido MA. Pole placement technique for PSS and TCSC-based stabilizer design using simulated annealing. Electr Pow Syst Res 2000; 22: 543-554.
  • [20] Abdel-Magid YL, Abido MA. Robust coordinated design of excitation and TCSC-based stabilizers using genetic algorithms. Electr Pow Syst Res 2004; 69: 129-141.
  • [21] Panda S, Padhy NP. Coordinated design of TCSC controller and PSS employing particle swarm optimization technique. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 2007; 4: 427-435.
  • [22] Narne R, Panda P, Therattil JP. Transient stability enhancement of SMIB system using PSS and TCSC-based controllers. In: 2011 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems; 5{8 December 2011; Singapore. New York, NY, USA: IEEE.
  • [23] Theja BS, Rajasekhar A, Abraham A. An optimal design of coordinated PI based PSS with TCSC controller using modi ed teaching learning based optimization. In: 2013 World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing; 12{14 August 2013, Fargo, ND, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE.
  • [24] Hadi SP, Wiennetou HI, Mochamad RF. TCSC power oscillation damping and PSS design using genetic algorithm modal optimal control. Int J Eng Comp Sci 2013; 13: 23-30.
  • [25] Rezazadeh A, Sedighizadeh M, Hasaninia A. Coordination of PSS and TCSC controller using modi ed particle swarm optimization algorithm to improve power system dynamic performance. J Zhejiang Univ-SC C 2010; 11: 645-653.
  • [26] Khorram AB, Lesani BH, Haghifam CM. Design coordinated controller PSS and TCSC for power dampng oscil- lations using bacterial foraging algorithm. International Journal of Advance Technology and Engineering Research 2013; 3: 1-8.
  • [27] Jalilzadeh S, Noroozian R, Tirtashi MRS, Farhang P. Comparison of TCSC and PSS state feedback controller performances on damping of power system oscillations using PSO. In: 2011 19th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering; 17{19 May 2011; Tehran, Iran. New York, NY, USA: IEEE.
  • [28] Naresh G, Raju MR, Narasimham SVL. Coordinated design of power system stabilizers and TCSC employing improved harmony search algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 2016; 27: 169-179.
  • [29] Ali ES, Abd-Elazim SM. Coordinated design of PSSs and TCSC via bacterial swarm optimization algorithm in a multimachine power system. Int J Elec Power 2012; 36: 84-92.
  • [30] Davarani RZ, Ghazi R. Optimal simultaneous coordination of PSS and TCSC using multi objective genetic algo- rithm. J Electr Syst 2013; 9: 410-421.
  • [31] Cheng MY, Prayogo D. Symbiotic organisms search: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Struct 2014; 139: 98-112.
  • [32] Guvenc U, Duman S, Dosoglu MK, Kahraman HT, Sonmez Y, Ylmaz C. Application of symbiotic organisms search algorithm to solve various economic load dispatch problems. In: 2016 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA); 2{5 August 2016; Sinaia, Romania. New York, NY, USA: IEEE.
  • [33] Kahraman HT, Dosoglu MK, Guvenc U, Duman S, Sonmez Y. Optimal scheduling of short-term hydrothermal generation using symbiotic organisms search algorithm. In: 2016 4th International _ Istanbul Smart Grid Congress and Fair; 20{21 April 2016; _ Istanbul, Turkey. New York, NY, USA: IEEE.
  • [34] Dosoglu MK, Guvenc U, Duman S, Sonmez Y, Kahraman HT. Symbiotic organisms search optimization algorithm for economic/emission dispatch problem in power systems. Neural Comput Appl (in press).
  • [35] Sonmez Y, Kahraman HT, Dosoglu MK, Guvenc U, Duman S. Symbiotic organisms search algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects. J Exp Theor Artif In 2017; 29: 495-515.
  • [36] Dorf RC, Bishop RH. Modern Control Systems. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2001.
  • [37] Wright A. Genetic algorithms for real parameters optimization. In: Rawlines JE, editor. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms. San Mateo, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1991. pp. 205-218.
  • [38] Kennedy J, Eberhart RC. Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks; 27 November{1 December 1995; Perth, Australia. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE. pp. 1942-1948.
  • [39] Panda S, Padhy NP. Comparison of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for FACTS-based controller design. Appl Soft Comput 2008; 8: 1418-1427.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Multiresponse optimization to improve the torque behavior of an outer-rotor permanent-magnet machine using gray relational analysis based on the Taguchi method

Yusuf ÖZOĞLU

Low-frequency exposure analysis using electric and magnetic eld measurements and predictions in the proximity of power transmission lines in urban areas

Hamza Feza CARLAK, Şükrü ÖZEN, Süleyman BİLGİN

S-visibility problem in VLSI chip design

Marzieh EKANDARI, Mahdieh YEGANEH

The reduction of semiconductor devices in a ying capacitor-based multilevel converter for use as an SSSC

Mana ROKHAFROOZ, Ali MOSALLANEJAD

On the independence of statistical randomness tests included in the NIST test suite

Fatih SULAK, Onur KOÇAK, Ali DOĞANAKSOY, Muhiddin UĞUZ

Force and torque parameter estimation for a 4-pole hybrid electromagnet by ANFIS hybrid learning algorithm

Kadir ERKAN, Murat ATLIHAN, Barış Can YALÇIN

Sample group and misplaced atom dictionary learning for face recognition

Zhe SUN, Meng WANG, Zhengping HU, Mei ZHU, Mei SUN

Using the variable width in a planar inductor on Kapton for optimizing its performance

Hayet KHARBOUCH, Azzedine HAMID, Thierry LEBEY, Leon HAVEZ, Celine COMBETTE, Vincent BLEY

Inverse kinematics of a 7-DOF redundant robot manipulator using the active set approach under joint physical limits

Modjtaba ROUHANI, Sima EBRAHIMABAD

Study and analysis of new pulsed electric eld treatment chamber con gurations for food extraction

Abdelkader CHAKER, Yassine BELLEBNA, Hamza BERMMAKI, Abdelkader SEMMAK, Amar TILMATINE