Analysis and design of grid-connected 3-phase 3-level AT-NPC inverter for low-voltage applications

The 3-level T-type neutral point clamped (T-NPC) inverter has become the most popular multilevel inverter used in low-voltage applications. However, the realization of a bidirectional switch located at the midpoint leg of the T-NPC inverter is achieved using two insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) with two antiparallel diodes. Power dissipation in these switches is high since there are two semiconductors (an IGBT and a diode) in the current path at the midpoint leg. Switch losses can be reduced and thus the highest conversion efficiency can be achieved if the bidirectional switches in the T-NPC inverter are replaced by highly efficient reverse-blocking IGBTs (RB-IGBTs). The objective of this paper is to assess the performance of a 3-phase 3-level grid-connected advanced T-NPC (AT-NPC) inverter with RBIGBT for low-voltage applications. This paper describes the operating principle of the grid-connected AT-NPC inverter, analyzes the power losses, and discusses the control strategy. A 1.7-kW laboratory prototype is designed and built to verify the feasibility and the effectiveness of the proposed 3-phase 3-level grid-connected AT-NPC inverter. Real-time control of the inverter is experimentally achieved using a dSPACE DS1103 controller. The experimental results show that the efficiency of the proposed grid-connected inverter is about 96.3%.

PDF

___

[1] Khosroshahi TM, Ajami A, Mokhberdoran OA, Oskuee JM. Multilevel hybrid cascade-stack inverter with substantial reduction in switches number and power losses. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2015; 23: 987-1000.
[2] Masaoud A, Ping WH, Mekhilef S, Belkamel H. Highly efficient three-phase three-level multilevel inverter employing different commutation strategies. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2016; 24: 76-87.
[3] Mohamad AS, Mariun N, Sulaiman N, Radzi MAM. A new cascaded multilevel inverter topology with minimum number of conducting switches. In: IEEE 2014 Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia; 2023 May 2014; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 164-169.
[4] Sivakumar K, Das A, Ramchand R, Patel C, Gopakumar K. A hybrid multilevel inverter topology for an open-end winding induction-motor drive using two-level inverters in series with a capacitor-fed H-bridge cell. IEEE T Ind Electron 2010; 57: 3707-3714.
[5] Wu F, Sun B, Duan J, Zhao K. Online variable topology-type photovoltaic grid-connected inverter. IEEE T Ind Electron 2015; 62: 4814-4822.
[6] Kouro S, Malinowski M, Gopakumar K, Pou J, Franquelo LG, Wu B, Rodriguez J, Perez MA, Leon JI. Recent advances and industrial applications of multilevel converters. IEEE T Ind Electron 2010; 57: 2553-2580.
[7] Colak I, Kabalci E, Bayindir R. Review of multilevel voltage source inverter topologies and control schemes. Energ Convers Manage 2011; 52: 1114-1128.
[8] Schweizer M, Kolar JW. Design and implementation of a highly efficient three-level T-type converter for low-voltage applications. IEEE T Power Electr 2013; 28: 899-907.
[9] Staudt I. 3L NPC & TNPC Topology. Semikron Application Note AN-11001. Nuremberg, Germany: Semikron, 2012.
[10] Schweizer M, Kolar JW. High efficiency drive system with 3-level T-type inverter. In: IEEE 2011 European Conference on International Power Electronics and Motion Control; 30 August1 September 2011; Birmingham, UK. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-10.
[11] Teichmann R, Bernet S. A comparison of three-level converters versus two-level converters for low-voltage drives, traction, and utility applications. IEEE T Ind Appl 2005; 41: 855-865.
[12] Uemura H, Krismer F, Kolar JW. Comparative evaluation of T-type topologies comprising standard and reverseblocking IGBTs. In: IEEE 2013 Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition; 519 September 2013; Denver, CO, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1288-1295.
[13] Grbovi PJ, Gruson F, Idir N, Le Moigne P. Turn-on performance of reverse blocking IGBT (RB IGBT) and optimization using advanced gate driver. IEEE T Power Electr 2010; 25: 970-980.
[14] Satheesh N, Takaku T. Advanced T-Type NPC- 3 Level Modules: A Novel Possibility with RB-IGBTs. Edison, NJ, USA: Fuji Electric, 2014.
[15] Zhang L, Sun K, Huang L, Igarashi S. Comparison of RB-IGBT and normal IGBT in T-type three-level inverter. In: IEEE 2013 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications; 26 September 2013; Lille, France. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-7.
[16] Cacau RGA, Bascope RPT, Neto JAF, Bascope GVT. Five-level T-type inverter based on multi-state switching cell. In: IEEE/IAS 2012 International Conference on Industry Applications; 57 November 2012; Fortaleza, Brazil. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-8.
[17] Yu W, Yaojie S, Yandan L, Junjun Z. Investigation on the dynamic behaviors of paralleling T-type IGBT modules. In: IEEE 2014 International Conference on Information Science, Electronics and Electrical Engineering; 2628 April 2014; Sapporo, Japan. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 932-938.
[18] Zhou D, Sun K, Huang L, Sasagawa K. A novel commutation method of matrix converter fed induction motor drive using RB-IGBT. In: IEEE 2005 Industry Applications Conference; 26 October 2005; Kowloon, Hong Kong. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 2347-2354.
[19] Bryant AT, Lu L, Santi E, Hudgins JL, Palmer PR. Modeling of IGBT resistive and inductive turn-on behavior. IEEE T Ind Appl 2008; 44: 904-914.
[20] Luo H, Chen Y, Sun P, Li W, He X. Junction temperature extraction approach with turn-off delay time for highvoltage high-power IGBT modules. IEEE T Power Electr 2016; 31: 5122-5132.
[21] Xiao H, Xie S, Chen Y, Huang R. An optimized transformerless photovoltaic grid-connected inverter. IEEE T Power Electr 2011; 58: 1887-1895.
[22] Avcı E. Design of highly efficient grid-connected inverter for renewable energy systems. MSc, D¨uzce University, D¨uzce, Turkey, 2015.
[23] U¸car M, Ozdemir S, ¨ Ozdemir E. A unified series-parallel active filter system for nonperiodic disturbances. Turk J ¨ Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2011; 19: 575-596.