An approach to improve the performance of cooperative unmanned vehicle team

In this paper, a method based on optimal energy management is proposed in order to improve the operationaland tactical abilities of collaborative unmanned vehicle teams. Collaborative unmanned systems are used in surveillance, tracking, and military operations. The optimal assignment of these tasks requires cooperation among the vehicles in order to generate a strategy that is efficient with respect to overall mission duration and satisfies all problem constraints. The key motivation behind this paper is to design an unmanned vehicle team that mitigates the disadvantages caused by the structures and characteristics of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which are used in these systems. The design steps of the developed system are explained in three sections in a multidisciplinary fashion. In the first section, the optimal energy consumption profile is estimated by simulating the UAV’s flight on a Nvidia Jetson TX2 embedded system, located on the UGV. In the second section, a UAV charger design and implementation is done via development of a TMS320F28335 DSP controlled 65 W inductive wireless power transfer circuit, and in thethird section an algorithm that calculates the optimal range and route for the user-selected way points using the state of charge of the UAV’s LiPo batteries and a preflight simulation using the simulated annealing method are developed. The experiments are performed in real time with an example scenario and the proposed strategy’s suitability and effectiveness are verified for cooperative unmanned vehicle teams.

PDF

___

[1] Luettel T, Himmelsbach M, Wuensche H. Autonomous ground vehicles: concepts and a path to the future. Proceedings of the IEEE 2012; 100: 1831-1839.
[2] Gulden TR. The Energy Implications of Drones for Package Delivery: A Geographic Information System Comparison. Santa Monica, CA, USA: RAND Corporation Research Reports, 2017.
[3] De Silva O, Mann GKI, Gosine RG. An ultrasonic and vision-based relative positioning sensor for multirobot localization. IEEE Sensors Journal 2014; 15: 1716-1726.
[4] Navaravong L, Kan Z, Shea JM, Dixon WE. Formation reconfiguration for mobile robots with network connectivity constraints. IEEE Network 2012; 26: 18-24.
[5] Grocholsky B, Keller J, Kumar V, Pappas G. Cooperative air and ground surveillance. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 2006; 13: 16-25.
[6] Dorling K, Heinrichs J, Messier GG, Magierowski S. Vehicle routing problems for drone delivery. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 2017; 47: 70-85.
[7] Leary S, Deittert M, Bookless J. Constrained UAV mission planning: a comparison of approaches. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops); 6–13 November 2011; Barcelona, Spain. pp. 2002-2009.
[8] Chien-Ming T, Chi-Kin C, Khaled E, Majid K. Autonomous recharging and flight mission planning for batteryoperated autonomous drones. Computing Research Repository 2017; abs/1703.10049.
[9] Savuran H, Karakaya M. Route optimization method for unmanned air vehicle launched from a carrier. Lecture Notes on Software Engineering 2015; 3: 279-284.
[10] Ding XC, Rahmani AR, Egerstedt M. Multi-UAV convoy protection: an optimal approach to path planning and coordination. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 2010; 26: 256-268.
[11] Kim JH, Kwon J, Seo J. Multi-UAV-based stereo vision system without GPS for ground obstacle mapping to assist path planning of UGV. Electronics Letters 2014; 50: 1431-1432.
[12] Maxwell P, Larkin D, Lowrance C. Turning remote-controlled military systems into autonomous force multipliers. IEEE Potentials 2013; 32: 39-43.
[13] Yu H, Meier K, Argyle M, Beard RW. Cooperative path planning for target tracking in urban environments using unmanned air and ground vehicles. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 2015; 20: 541-552.
[14] Galvez RL, Dadios EP, Bandala AA. Path planning for quadrotor UAV using genetic algorithm. In: 2014 International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management; 12–16 November 2014; Palawan, the Philippines. pp. 31-6.
[15] Lu M, Bagheri M, James AP, Phung T. Wireless charging techniques for UAVs: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 29865-29884.
[16] Meng H, Xin G. UAV route planning based on the genetic simulated annealing algorithm. In: IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation; 4–7 August 2010; Xi’an, China. pp. 788-793.
[17] Cekmez U, Ozsiginan M, Sahingoz OK. A UAV path planning with parallel ACO algorithm on CUDA platform. In: International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems; 27–30 May 2014; Orlando, FL, USA. pp. 347-354.
[18] Aboharba SEK. Development of a collaborative delivery system with unmanned aerial vehicles and delivery trucks. PhD, Atılım University, Ankara, Turkey, 2018.
[19] Oktay T, Celik H, Turkmen I. Maximizing autonomous performance of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle to reduce motion blur in taken images. Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 2018; 232: 857-868.
[20] Moskvitch K. Take off: are drones the future of farming? Engineering and Technology 2015; 10: 62-66.
[21] Kalwar KA, Aamir M, Mekhilef S. Inductively coupled power transfer (ICPT) for electric vehicle charging – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews - Engineering and Technology 2015; 47: 462-475.
[22] Jiang C, Chau KT, Liu C, Lee CHT. An overview of resonant circuits for wireless power transfer. Energies 2017; 10: 1-20.
[23] Junaid AB, Lee Y, Kim Y. Design and implementation of autonomous wireless charging station for rotary-wing UAVs. Aerospace Science and Technology 2016; 54: 253-266.
[24] Zheng C, Zhang L, Zhao X, Choe J, Lai JS. Asymmetrical loosely coupled transformer for wireless laptop charger with higher misalignment tolerance. In: IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE); 20–24 September 2015; Montreal, Canada. pp. 3119-3126.
[25] Wang ZH, Li YP, Sun Y, Tang CS, Lv X. Load detection model of voltage-fed inductive power transfer system. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 2013; 28: 5233-5243.
[26] Franco CD, Buttazzo G. Energy-aware coverage path planning of UAVs. In: IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions; 8–10 April 2015; Vila Real, Portugal. pp. 111-117.
[27] Tlili T, Krichen S, Faiz S. Simulated annealing-based decision support system for routing problems. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics; 5–8 October 2014; San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 2954- 2958.
[28] Behnck LP, Doering D, Pereira CE, Rettberg A. A modified simulated annealing algorithm for SUAVs path planning. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015; 48: 63-68.
[29] Rutenbar RA. Simulated annealing algorithms: an overview. IEEE Circuits and Devices Mag 1989; 5: 19-26