A multiobjective tuning approach of power system stabilizers using particle swarm optimization

A multiobjective tuning approach of power system stabilizers using particle swarm optimization

This work presents an optimal tuning approach of power system stabilizers (PSSs) using multiobjective particle swarm optimization. Two types of PSSs are investigated, the conventional speed-based PSS type and a dual-input PSS type that uses the accelerating power as an additional input. The tuning problem of these PSSs is formulated as a minimization problem of a vector objective function characterizing the damping and the transient performance of the closed-loop system. A 3-machine 9-bus power system example is considered, and the speed-constrained multiobjective particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to solve the optimization problem. The results show that trade-offs exist between the 2 objective functions of the problem, and that the best trade-off is obtained with the dual-input PSS. The performance of the resulting PSSs is illustrated through numerical simulations considering different scenarios.

___

  • [1] Anderson PM, Fouad AA. Power System Control and Stability. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press, 1977.
  • [2] Dr´eo J, P´etrowski A, Taillard E. Metaheuristics for Hard Optimization. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
  • [3] Dubey M, Gupta P. Design of genetic-algorithm based robust power system stabilizer. Int J Comput Int 2005; 2: 48-52.
  • [4] Soliman HM, Bayoumi EE, Hassan MF. PSO-based power system stabilizer for minimal overshoot and control constraints. J Electr Eng 2008; 59: 153-159.
  • [5] Das TK, Venayagamoorthy GK, Aliyu UO. Bio-inspired algorithms for the design of multiple optimal power system stabilizers: SPPSO and BFA. IEEE T Ind Appl Soc 2008; 44: 1445-1457.
  • [6] Abdel-Magid YL, Abido MA, Al-Baiyat S, Mantawy AH. Simultaneous stabilization of multimachine power systems via genetic algorithms. IEEE T Power Syst 1999; 14: 1428-1439.
  • [7] Jeevanandham A, Thanushkodi KG. Robust design of decentralized power system stabilizers using meta-heuristic optimization techniques for multimachine systems. Serb J Electr Eng 2009; 6: 89-103.
  • [8] Mitra P, Yan C, Grant L, Venayagamoorthy GK, Folly K. Comparative study of population based techniques for power system stabilizer design. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent System Applications to Power Systems; 8–12 November 2009; Curitiba, Brazil. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.
  • [9] Khodabakhshian A, Hemmati R. Multi-machine power system stabilizer design by using cultural algorithms. Electr Pow Energ Syst 2012; 44: 571-580.
  • [10] Chuang YS, Wu CJ. A damping constant limitation design of power system stabilizer using hybrid differential evolution. J Mar Sci Technol 2006; 14: 84-92.
  • [11] Abdel Ghany AM. Design of a mixed H2/H∞ robust PID power system stabilizer with fuzzy adaptation and simulated annealing optimization. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Middle-East Power System Conference; March 2008; Aswan, Egypt. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.
  • [12] Surinkaew T, Ngamroo I. Robust power oscillation damper design for DFIG-based wind turbine based on specified structure mixed H2/H∞ control. Renew Energ 2013; 66: 15-24.
  • [13] Sebaa K, Boudour M. Robust power system stabilizers design using multi-objective genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting 2007; 24–28 June 2007; Tampa, FL, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.
  • [14] Khaleghi M, Mohammadian M, Khorasaninejad M, Farsangi MM. Design of two power system stabilizers coordinately based on strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications; 25–27 May 2009; Xi’an, China. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.
  • [15] Hasanovic A, Feliachi A. Robust PSS tuning through multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the Power Systems Conference and Exposition; 10–13 October 2004; New York NY. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.
  • [16] Panda S. Multiobjective non–dominated sorting genetic algorithm–II for excitation and TCSC–based controller design. J Electr Eng 2009; 60: 86-93.
  • [17] Pan I, Das S. Chaotic multi-objective optimization based design of fractional order PI λD µcontroller in AVR system. Electr Pow Energ Syst 2012; 43: 393-407.
  • [18] Panda S, Yegireddy NK. Automatic generation control of multi-area power system using multiobjective nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Electr Pow Energ Syst 2013; 53: 54-63.
  • [19] Labdelaoui H, Boudjema F, Boukhetala D. Multiobjective mixed H2/H∞ synthesis of power system stabilizers using particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Electrical Engineering; 8–10 May 2012; Algiers, Algeria.
  • [20] Kennedy J, Eberhart RC. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Neural Networks; 27 November–3 December 1995; Perth, Australia. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.
  • [21] Nebro AJ, Durillo JJ, Garc´ıa-Nieto J, Coello Coello CA, Luna F, Alba E. SMPSO: A new PSO-based metaheuristic for multi-objective optimization. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multicriteria DecisionMaking; 30 March–2 April 2009; Nashville, TN, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.
  • [22] Giannakoglou K, Tsahalis D, Periaux J, Papailiou K, Fogarty T, editors. Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control. Barcelona, Spain: CIMNE, 2002.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK