A comparative study of nonlinear Bayesian filtering algorithms for estimation of gene expression time series data

A comparative study of nonlinear Bayesian filtering algorithms for estimation of gene expression time series data

This paper addresses the problem of estimating the time series of a gene expression using nonlinear Bayesianfiltering algorithms. The response of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) to functional requirements in the cell andenvironmental conditions evolves over time. Dynamic biological processes such as cancer progression and treatmentrecovery depend on the collected genetic profiles. These processes are behind genetic interactions that rewire overthe course of time. The GRN was formulated as a nonlinear and non-Gaussian dynamic system defined by the genemeasurement model and the unknown state is an evolution of the gene model. However, the GRN has a high dimensionalspace where most of nonlinear Bayesian filtering algorithms are ineffective in high dimensional spaces. Therefore, manyauthors have introduced various techniques to overcome what has become known as the curse of dimensionality. Thispaper presents a comparative study between extended Kalman filter, unscented Kalman filter and derivatives of particlefilters, in tracking the evolution of gene expression over time. Application of the nonlinear Bayesian filtering algorithmsto estimate the evolution of gene expression from synthetic and real data, shows that the unscented particle filter (UKFPF) provides promising and robust results compared to other filters. Furthermore, UKF-PF provides an alternativesolution to the problem of modeling gene regulatory networks.

___

  • [1] Wang Z, Liu X, Liu Y, Liang J, Vinciotti V. An extended kalman filtering approach to modeling nonlinear dynamic gene regulatory networks via short gene expression time series. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 2009; 6: 410-419.
  • [2] Bugallo MF, Tasdemir C, Djuric PM. Estimation of gene expression by a bank of particle filters. In: IEEE 2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference; Nice, France; 2015. pp. 494-498.
  • [3] Noor A, Serpedin E, Nounou M, Nounou H. Inferring gene regulatory networks via nonlinear state-space models and exploiting sparsity. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 2012; 9: 1203-1211.
  • [4] Fan Y, Wang X, Peng Q. Inference of gene regulatory networks using bayesian nonparametric regression and topology information. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2017: 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2017/8307530
  • [5] Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK, Durrant-Whyte H F. A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2000; 45: 477-482.
  • [6] Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK. Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE 2004; 92: 401-422.
  • [7] Doucet A, Johansen A. A tutorial on particle filtering and smoothing: fifteen years later. In: Crisan D, Rozovsky B (editors). Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • [8] Andrieu C, Doucet A, Holenstein R. Particle markov chain monte carlo methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 2010; 72: 269-342.
  • [9] Van Der Merwe R, Doucet A, De Freitas N, Wan E. The unscented particle filter. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; Denver, CO, USA; 2000. pp. 563-569.
  • [10] Amor N, Kahlaoui S, Chebbi S. Unscented particle filter using student-t distribution with non-Gaussian measurement noise. In: IEEE IC-ASET 2018- International Conference on Advanced Systems and Electric Technologies; Hammamet, Tunisia; 2018. pp. 34-38.
  • [11] Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK. New extension of the kalman filter to nonlinear systems. In: Signal processing, sensor fusion, and target recognition VI, International Society for Optics and Photonics; Orlando, FL, USA; 1997. pp. 182-194.
  • [12] Terejanu GA. Unscented kalman filter tutorial. In: Workshop on Large-Scale Quantification of Uncertainty; Sandia National Laboratories; Livermore, CA, USA; 2009. pp. 1-6.
  • [13] Gordon NJ, Salmond DJ, Smith AFM. Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation. IEEE Proceedings in Radar and Signal Processing 1993; 140: 107-113.
  • [14] Crisan D, Doucet A. A survery of convergence results on particle filtering methods for practitioners. Transaction on Signal Processing 2002; 50: 736-746.
  • [15] Särkkä S. Bayesian Filtering and Smoonthing. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • [16] Arulampalam M S, Maskell S, Gordon N, Clapp T. A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian bayesian tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2002; 50: 174-188.
  • [17] Doucet A, Godsill S, Andrieu C. On sequential monte carlo sampling methods for bayesian filtering. Statistics and Computing 2000; 10: 197-208.
  • [18] Maduro MF, Rothman JH. Making worm guts: the gene regulatory network of the caenorhabditis elegans endoderm. Developmental Biology Journal 2002; 246 : 68-85.
  • [19] Carlson KA, Zhang C, Harshman LG. A dataset for assessing temporal changes in gene expression during the aging process of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Data in Brief 2016; 7: 1652-1657.
  • [20] Stevens JP. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.