Superior decoupled control of active and reactive power for three-phase voltage source converters

This paper presents an active-reactive power control strategy for voltage source converters (VSCs) based on derivation of the direct and quadrature components of the VSC output current. The proposed method utilizes a multivariable proportional-integral controller and provides almost completely decoupled control capability of the active and reactive power with almost full disturbance rejection due to step changes in the power exchanged between the VSC and the grid. It also imposes fast transient response and zero steady-state error as compared to the conventional power control approaches. The applicability of the proposed power control strategy for providing the robust stability of the system against the uncertainties of the load parameters is also investigated. The superiority of the proposed control strategy over conventional approaches in the new condition of supplying the load is demonstrated. The theoretical aspects of the proposed multivariable-based power control strategy and the conventional approaches are reviewed and simulation results are presented in two separate sections. MATLAB/Simulink 2009a is used to simulate different scenarios of the simulation.

Superior decoupled control of active and reactive power for three-phase voltage source converters

This paper presents an active-reactive power control strategy for voltage source converters (VSCs) based on derivation of the direct and quadrature components of the VSC output current. The proposed method utilizes a multivariable proportional-integral controller and provides almost completely decoupled control capability of the active and reactive power with almost full disturbance rejection due to step changes in the power exchanged between the VSC and the grid. It also imposes fast transient response and zero steady-state error as compared to the conventional power control approaches. The applicability of the proposed power control strategy for providing the robust stability of the system against the uncertainties of the load parameters is also investigated. The superiority of the proposed control strategy over conventional approaches in the new condition of supplying the load is demonstrated. The theoretical aspects of the proposed multivariable-based power control strategy and the conventional approaches are reviewed and simulation results are presented in two separate sections. MATLAB/Simulink 2009a is used to simulate different scenarios of the simulation.

___

  • Singh B, Sharma S. Design and implementation of four leg voltage source converter-based VFC for autonomous
  • wind energy conversion system. IEEE T Ind Electron 2012; 59: 4694–4703.
  • Torres-Olguin RE, Molinas M, Undeland T. Offshore wind farm grid integration by VSC technology with LCC-based
  • HVDC transmission. IEEE T Sus Energy 2012; 3: 899–907.
  • Gomis-Bellmunt O, Junyent-Ferre A, Sumper A, Bergas-Jane J. Control of a wind farm based on synchronous
  • generators with a central HVDC-VSC converter. IEEE T Power Sys 2011; 26: 1632–1640.
  • Byon E, Perez E, Ding Y. Simulation of wind farm operations and maintenance using discrete event system
  • specification. T Soc Model Simul I 2010; 87: 1093–1117.
  • Abbes M, Belhadj J, Ben Abdelghani Bennani A. Design and control of a direct drive wind turbine equipped with
  • multilevel converters. Renew Energ 2010; 35: 936–945.
  • Choi W, Lai J. High efficiency grid connected photovoltaic module integrated converter system with high speed
  • communication interfaces for small scale distribution power generation. Sol Energy 2010; 84: 636–649.
  • Wasynczuk O, Anwah NA. Modeling and dynamic performance of a self-commutated photovoltaic inverter system.
  • IEEE T Energy Conver 1989; 4: 322–328.
  • Shimizu T, Hashimoto O, Kimura G. A novel high performance utility interactive photovoltaic inverter system.
  • IEEE T Power Electr 2003; 18: 704–711.
  • Mohr M, Franke WT, Wittig B, Fuchs FW. Converter systems for fuel cells in the medium power range a comparative
  • study. IEEE T Ind Electron 2010; 57: 2024–2032.
  • Jovcic D, Lamont L, Abbott K. Control system design for VSC transmission. Elect Pow Sys Res 2007; 77: 721–729.
  • Fung R, Yang R. Application of VSC in position control of a nonlinear electrohydraulic servo system. Comput
  • Struct 1998; 66: 365–372.
  • Latorre HF, Ghandhari M, S¨oder L. Active and reactive power control of a VSC-HVDC. Elect Pow Sys Res 2008; 78: 1756–1763.
  • Hu J, Yuan X. VSC-based direct torque and reactive power control of doubly fed induction generator. Renew Energ 2012; 40: 13–23.
  • Etxeberria-Otadui I, Viscarret U, Caballero M, Rufer A, Bacha S. New optimized PWM VSC control structures
  • and strategies under unbalanced voltage transients. IEEE T Ind Electron 2007; 54: 2902–2914.
  • Gao F, Iravani MR. A control strategy for a distributed generation unit in grid connected and autonomous modes of operation. IEEE T Power Deliver 2008; 23: 850–859.
  • Wang Y, Lu Z, Min Y. Analysis and comparison on the control strategies of multiple voltage source converters in autonomous microgrid. In: 10th IET International Conference on Developments in Power System Protection, 2010. pp. 1–5.
  • Liserre M, Teodorescu R, Blaabjerg F. Multiple harmonics control for three phase grid converter systems with the use of PI-RES current controller in a rotating frame. IEEE T Ind Electron 2006; 21: 836–841.
  • Jung J, Choi Y, Leu VQ, Choi HH. Fuzzy PI-type current controllers for permanent magnet synchronous motors.
  • IET Electr Power App 2011; 5: 143–152.
  • Kazmierkowski MP, Malesani L. Current control techniques for three phase voltage source PWM converters: a survey. IEEE T Ind Electron 1998; 45: 691–703.
  • Lee TS, Tzeng KS. Input output linearizing control with load estimator for three phase AC/DC voltage source converters. In: 33rd Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2002. pp. 791–795.
  • Nikkhajoei H, Iravani R. Dynamic model and control of AC/DC/AC voltage sourced converter system for distributed
  • resources. IEEE T Power Deliver 2007; 22: 1169–1178.
  • Mohd A, Ortjohann E, Morton D, Omari O. Review of control techniques for inverters parallel operation. Elect
  • Pow Sys Res 2010; 80: 1477–1487.
  • Guo XQ, Wu WY, Rong Gu H. Modeling and simulation of direct output current control for LCL-interfaced grid
  • connected inverters with parallel passive damping. Simul Model Pract Th 2010; 18: 946–956.
  • Bahrani B, Kenzelmann S, Rufer A. Multivariable PI-based dq current control of voltage source converters with
  • superior axis decoupling capability. IEEE T Ind Electron 2011; 58: 3016–3068.
  • Reyes M, Rodriguez P, Vazquez S, Luna A, Teodorescu R, Carrasco JM. Enhanced decoupled double synchronous
  • reference frame current controller for unbalanced grid voltage conditions. IEEE T Power Electr 2012; 27: 3934–3943.
  • De Brabandere K, Bolsens B, Van den Keybus J, Woyte A, Driesen J, Belmans R. A voltage and frequency droop control method for parallel inverters. IEEE T Power Electr 2007; 22: 1107–1115.
  • Wei LY, Kao CN. An accurate power control strategy for power electronics-Interfaced distributed generation units operating in a low voltage multi bus microgrid. IEEE T Power Electr 2009: 24: 2977–2988.
  • Guerrero JM, Matas J, Garcia de Vicuna L, Castilla M, Miret J. Decentralized control for parallel operation of
  • Schauder S, Mehta H. Vector analysis and control of advanced static VAR compensators. IEE P-Gener Transm D 1993; 140: 299–306.
  • B¨uhler H. R´eglage des Syst`emes d’ ´Electronique de Puissance. Lausanne, Switzerland: PPUR Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, 1997.