Solution to the unit commitment problem using an artificial neural network

This paper proposes a real-time solution to the unit commitment problem by considering different constraints like ramp-up rate, unit operation emissions, next hours load, and minimum down time. In this method, an optimized trade-off between cost and emission has been taken into consideration. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified by the significant outcomes demonstrated.

Solution to the unit commitment problem using an artificial neural network

This paper proposes a real-time solution to the unit commitment problem by considering different constraints like ramp-up rate, unit operation emissions, next hours load, and minimum down time. In this method, an optimized trade-off between cost and emission has been taken into consideration. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified by the significant outcomes demonstrated.

___

  • T.Y. Lee, C.L. Chen, “Unit commitment with probabilistic reserve, an IPSO approach”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 48, pp. 486–493, 2006.
  • K. Afshar, M. Ehsan, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, A. Ahmadi-Khatir, N. Bigdeli, “A new approach for reserve market clearing and cost allocating in a pool model”, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B: Engineering, Vol. 31, pp. 593–602, 2007.
  • H.Y. Yamin, Q. El-Dwairi, S.M. Shahidehpour, “A new approach for GenCos profit based unit commitment in dayahead competitive electricity markets considering reserve uncertainty”, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 29, pp. 609–616, 2007.
  • V.N. Dieu, W. Ongsakul, “Ramp rate constrained unit commitment by improved priority list and augmented Lagrange Hopfield network”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 78, pp. 291–301, 2008.
  • T. Senjyu, K. Shimabukuro, K. Uezato, T. Funabashi, “A fast technique for unit commitment problem by extended priority list”, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition: Asia Pacific, Vol. 1, pp. 244– 249, 2003.
  • H. Daneshi, A.L. Choobbari, M. Shahidehpour, L. Zuyi, “Mixed integer programming method to solve security constrained unit commitment with restricted operating zone limits electro/information technology”, IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology, pp. 187–192, 2008.
  • N.P. Padhy, “Unit commitment-a bibliographical survey”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 19, pp. 1196– 1205, 2004.
  • T. Sum-im, W. Ongsakul, “Ant colony search algorithm for unit commitment industrial technology”, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 72–77, 2003.
  • H. Daneshi, M. Shahidehpour, S. Afsharnia, A. Naderian, A. Rezaei, “Application of fuzzy dynamic programming and neural network in generation scheduling”, Proceedings of the IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference, Vol. 3, 200 H.Y. Yamin, S.M. Shahidehpour, “Unit commitment using a hybrid model between Lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithm in competitive electricity markets”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 68, pp. 83–92, 2004. C.P. Cheng, C.W. Liu, G.C. Liu, “Unit commitment by annealing-genetic algorithm”, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 24, pp. 149–158, 2000.
  • A.S ¸. Uyar, B. T¨ urkay, “Evolutionary algorithms for the unit commitment problem”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Vol. 16, pp. 239–255, 2008.
  • Z. Ouyang, S.M. Shahidehpour, “A hybrid artificial neural network-dynamic programming approach to unit commitment”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 236–242, 1992.
  • H. Sasaki, Y. Fuuji, M. Watanabe, J. Kubokawa, N. Yorino, “A solution method using neural network for the generator commitment problem”, Electrical Engineering in Japan, Vol. 112, pp. 55–61, 1992.
  • A. Badri, S. Jadid, M.P. Moghaddam, M. Rashidinejad, “The impact of generators’ behaviors on Nash equilibrium considering transmission constraints”, European Transactions on Electrical Power, Vol. 19, pp. 765–777, 2009.
  • A.Y. Saber, S. Chakraborty, S.M. Abdur Razzak, T. Senjyu, “Optimization of economic load dispatch of higher order general cost polynomials and its sensitivity using modified particle swarm optimization”, Electric Power System Research, Vol. 79, pp. 98–106, 2008.
  • M. Pourakbari-Kasmaei, M. Rashidi-Nejad, A. Abdollahi, “A unit commitment method considering next load demand via metaheuristic techniques”, International Conference on Power Control and Optimization, 2008.
  • K.S. Swarup, S. Yamashiro, “Unit commitment solution methodology using genetic algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Power System, Vol. 17, pp. 87–91, 2002.
  • R.L. Haupt, S.E. Haupt, Practical Genetic Algorithms, New York, Wiley, 2004.
  • M. Pourakbari-Kasmaei, M. Rashidi-Nejad, A. Abdollahi, “A novel unit commitment technique considering prohibited operating zones”, Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, pp. 2962–2968, 2009.
  • S. Chen, C.F.N. Cowan, P.M. Grant, “Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 2, pp. 302–309, 1991.
  • T. Senjyu, T. Miyagi, A.Y. Saber, N. Urasaki, T. Funabashi, “Emerging solution of large-scale unit commitment problem by stochastic priority list”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 76, pp. 283–292, 2006.
  • K.A. Juste, H. Kita, E. Tanaka, J. Hasegawa, “An evolutionary programming to the unit commitment problem”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 14, pp. 1452–1459, 1999.
  • B. Zhao, C.X. Guo, B.R. Bai, Y.J. Cao, “An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for unit commitment”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 28, pp. 482–490, 2006.
  • I.G. Damousis, A.G. Bakirtzis, P.S. Dokopoulos, “A solution to the unit-commitment problem using integer-coded genetic algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 19, pp. 1165–1172, 2004.
  • Z.L. Gaing, “Discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm for unit commitment”, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Vol. 1, pp. 418–424, 2003.
  • H.H. Balci, J.F. Valenzuela, “Scheduling electric power generators using particle swarm optimization combined with the Lagrangian relaxation method”, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Vol. 14, pp. 411–421, 2004.
  • C.P. Cheng, C.W. Liu, G.C. Liu, “Unit commitment by Lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithms”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 15, pp. 707–714, 2000.
  • S.A. Kazarlis, A.G. Bakirtzis, V. Petridis, “A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 11, pp. 83–92, 1996.
  • W. Ongsakul, N. Petcharaks, “Unit commitment by enhanced adaptive Lagrangian relaxation”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 19, pp. 620–628, 2004.
  • L. Sun, Y. Zhang, C. Jiang, “A matrix real-coded genetic algorithm to the unit commitment problem”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 76, pp. 716–728, 2006.
  • J. Valenzuela, A.E. Smith, “A seeded mimetic algorithm for large unit commitment problems”, Journal of Heuristics, Vol. 8, pp. 173–195, 2002.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK