Optimal placement and sizing of distributed generations in distribution systems for minimizing losses and THDv using evolutionary programming

Growing concerns over environmental impacts, improvement of the overall network conditions, and rebate programs offered by governments have led to an increase in the number of distributed generation (DG) units in commercial and domestic electric power production. However, a large number of DG units in a distribution system may sometimes contribute to high levels of harmonic distortion, even though the emission levels of the individual DG units comply with the harmonic standards. It is known that the nonoptimal size and nonoptimal placement of DG units may lead to high power losses, bad voltage profiles, and harmonic propagations. Therefore, this paper introduces a sensitivity analysis to determine the optimal location of DG units, as well as evolutionary programming and harmonic distribution load flow for determining the optimal size of DG units in radial distribution systems. A multiobjective function is created to minimize the total losses and average total harmonic distortion voltage (THDv) of the distribution system. The proposed methodology is tested with a 69-bus radial distribution system. The proposed optimal placement and sizing of the DG units is found to be robust and provides higher efficiency for the improvement of the voltage profile and the minimization of the losses and THDv.

Optimal placement and sizing of distributed generations in distribution systems for minimizing losses and THDv using evolutionary programming

Growing concerns over environmental impacts, improvement of the overall network conditions, and rebate programs offered by governments have led to an increase in the number of distributed generation (DG) units in commercial and domestic electric power production. However, a large number of DG units in a distribution system may sometimes contribute to high levels of harmonic distortion, even though the emission levels of the individual DG units comply with the harmonic standards. It is known that the nonoptimal size and nonoptimal placement of DG units may lead to high power losses, bad voltage profiles, and harmonic propagations. Therefore, this paper introduces a sensitivity analysis to determine the optimal location of DG units, as well as evolutionary programming and harmonic distribution load flow for determining the optimal size of DG units in radial distribution systems. A multiobjective function is created to minimize the total losses and average total harmonic distortion voltage (THDv) of the distribution system. The proposed methodology is tested with a 69-bus radial distribution system. The proposed optimal placement and sizing of the DG units is found to be robust and provides higher efficiency for the improvement of the voltage profile and the minimization of the losses and THDv.

___

  • M. Begovic, “Sustainable energy technologies and distributed generation”, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Vol. 1, pp. 540–545, 2001.
  • P.A. Daly, J. Morrison, “Understanding the potential benefits of distributed generation on power delivery systems”, Rural Electric Power Conference, Vol. 1, pp. A2/1–A213, 2001.
  • R.C. Dugan, T.E. McDermott, G.J. Ball, “Distribution planning for distributed generation”, Rural Electric Power Conference, Vol. 1, pp. C4/1–C4/7, 2000.
  • O. Amanifar, M.E. Hamedani Golshan, “Optimal distributed generation placement and sizing for loss and THD reduction and voltage profile improvement in distribution system using particle swarm optimization and sensitivity analysis”, International Journal on Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 47–53, 2011.
  • A. Eajal, M.E. El-Hawary, “Optimal capacitor placement and sizing in unbalanced distribution system with harmonic consideration using particle swarm optimization”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 25, pp. 1734–1741, 2010.
  • V. Miranda, “Wind power, distributed generation: new challengers, new solutions”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 14, pp. 455–473, 2006.
  • N.S. Rau, Y.H. Wan, “Optimal location of resources in distributed planning”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 9, pp. 2014–2020, 1994.
  • M. Gandomkar, M. Vakilian, M. Ehsan, “Optimal distributed generation allocation in distribution network using Hereford Ranch algorithm”, 8th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, Vol. 2, pp. 916–918, 200 J.O. Kim, S.W. Nam, S.K. Park, C. Singh, “Dispersed generation planning using improved Hereford Ranch algorithm”, Electric Power System Research, Vol. 47, pp. 47–55, 1998.
  • K.H. Kim, Y.J. Lee, S.B. Rhee, S.K. Lee, S.K. You, “Dispersed generator placement using fuzzy-GA in distribution systems”, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Vol. 3, pp. 1148–1153, 2002.
  • A. Silvestri, A. Berizzi, S. Buonanno, “Distributed generation planning using genetic algorithms”, International Conference on Electrical Power Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 99–105, 1999.
  • H.L. Willis, “Analytical methods and rules of thumb for modeling DG distribution interaction”, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Vol. 3, pp. 1643–1644, 2000.
  • N. Rugthaichararoencheep, S. Sirisumrannukul, “Feeder reconfiguration with dispatchable distributed generators in distribution system by tabu search”, 44th International Universities Power Engineering Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 57–62, 2009.
  • G. Celli, E. Ghaiani, S. Mocci, F. Pilo, “A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for the sizing and sitting of distributed generation”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 20, pp. 750–757, 2005.
  • A. Parizad, A.H. Khazali, M. Kalantar, “Sitting and sizing of distributed generation through harmony search algorithm for improve voltage profile and reduction of THD and losses”, 23rd Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 1–7, 2010.
  • N. Jain, S.N. Singh, S.C. Srivastava, “Particle swarm optimization based method for optimal siting and sizing of multiple distributed generators”, 16th National Power Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 669–674, 2010.
  • C.Y. Chang, J.H. Teng, “Three-phase harmonic load flow method”, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 839–844, 2002.
  • J.H. Teng, C.Y. Chang, “Backward/forward sweep-based harmonic analysis method for distribution systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 22, pp. 1665–1672, 2007.
  • N.A.M. Kamari, I. Musirin, M.M. Othman, “EP based optimization for estimating synchronizing and damping torque coefficients”, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 4, pp. 3741–3754, 2010.
  • N.R.H. Abdullah, I. Musirin, M.M. Othman, “Transmission loss minimization using evolutionary programming considering UPFC installation cost”, International Review of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 2, pp. 1189–1203, 2010. A.S. Uyar, B. T¨ urkay, “Evolutionary algorithms for the unit commitment problem”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Vol. 16, pp. 239–255, 2008.
  • Y.D. Lee, C.S. Chen, C.T. Hsu, H.S. Cheng, “Harmonic analysis for the distribution system with dispersed generation systems”, International Conference on Power System Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 1–6, 2006.
  • IEEE, IEEE Std.519-1992, IEEE Recommended Practices and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electrical Power Systems, 1992.