Improving power systems operation through multiobjective optimal location of optimal unified power flow controller

This paper presents a multiobjective optimization methodology to find the optimal location for an optimal unified power flow controller (OUPFC) device. Moreover, the installation cost function of the OUPFC device is developed. The objective functions are the total fuel cost, power losses, and system loadability with and without the minimum cost of the OUPFC installation. The \varepsilon-constraint approach is implemented for the multiobjective mathematical programming formulation. The proposed algorithm is implemented in the IEEE 30- and 118-bus test systems. The solution procedure uses nonlinear programming to optimally locate the OUPFC incorporated in an optimal power flow problem considering these objective functions and improves the operation of the power system. The optimization problem is modeled in the general algebraic modeling system software using a MINOS solver. Furthermore, the results obtained by the OUPFC are compared to those of the phase shifting transformer (PST) and unified power flow controller (UPFC) devices. The performance and applicability of the OUPFC is highlighted compared to the PST and UPFC from an analytical and technical point of view.

Improving power systems operation through multiobjective optimal location of optimal unified power flow controller

This paper presents a multiobjective optimization methodology to find the optimal location for an optimal unified power flow controller (OUPFC) device. Moreover, the installation cost function of the OUPFC device is developed. The objective functions are the total fuel cost, power losses, and system loadability with and without the minimum cost of the OUPFC installation. The \varepsilon-constraint approach is implemented for the multiobjective mathematical programming formulation. The proposed algorithm is implemented in the IEEE 30- and 118-bus test systems. The solution procedure uses nonlinear programming to optimally locate the OUPFC incorporated in an optimal power flow problem considering these objective functions and improves the operation of the power system. The optimization problem is modeled in the general algebraic modeling system software using a MINOS solver. Furthermore, the results obtained by the OUPFC are compared to those of the phase shifting transformer (PST) and unified power flow controller (UPFC) devices. The performance and applicability of the OUPFC is highlighted compared to the PST and UPFC from an analytical and technical point of view.

___

  • A. Lashkar Ara, A. Kazemi, S.A. Nabavi Niaki, “Optimal location of hybrid flow controller considering modified steady-state model”, Applied Energy, Vol. 88, pp. 1578–1585, 2011.
  • R. Grunbaum, P. Lundberg, G. Stromberg, B. Berggren, “Congestion relief: FACTS – the key to congestion relief”, ABB Review, Vol. 2, pp. 28–32, 2007.
  • L. Gyugyi, “Unified power-flow control concept for flexible AC transmission systems”, IEE Proceedings - Generation Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 139, pp. 323–331, 1992.
  • Y.H. Song, A.T. Johns, Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS), London, IEE Press, 1999.
  • N.G. Hingorani, L. Gyugyi, Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems, New York, Wiley IEEE Press, 2000.
  • S.A. Nabavi Niaki, M.R. Iravani, “Steady-state and dynamic modeling of unified power flow controller (UPFC) for power system studies”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 11, pp. 1937–1943, 1996.
  • M. Noroozian, L. Angquist, M. Ghandhari, G. Andersson, “Use of UPFC for optimal power flow control”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 12, pp. 1629–1634, 1997.
  • W.J. Lyman, “Controlling power flow with phase-shifting equipment”, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Vol. 49, pp. 825–831, 1930.
  • Z. Han, “Phase-shifter and power flow control”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. PAS 101, pp. 3790–3795, 19
  • M. Noroozian, G. Anderson, “Power flow control by use of controllable series components”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 8, pp. 1420–1429, 1993.
  • M.R. Iravani, D. Maratukulam, “Review of semiconductor-controlled (static) phase shifters for power system applications”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 9, pp. 1833–1839, 1994.
  • M.R. Iravani, P.L. Dandeno, D. Maratukulam, K.H. Nguyen, D. Zhu, “Applications of static phase shifters in power systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 9, pp. 1600–1608, 1994.
  • S.A. Nabavi Niaki, “A novel steady-state model and principles of operation of phase-shifting transformer comparable with FACTS new devices”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology, Vol. 3, pp. 1450–1457, 2002.
  • A. Lashkar Ara, A. Kazemi, S.A. Nabavi Niaki, “Modelling of optimal unified power flow controller (OUPFC) for optimal steady-state performance of power systems”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 52, pp. 1325–1333, 20
  • M.R. Alrashidi, M.E. El-Hawary, “Application of computational intelligence techniques for solving the revived optimal power flow problem”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 79, pp. 694–702, 2009.
  • H.W. Dommel, W.F. Tinney, “Optimal power flow solutions”, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS 87, pp. 1866–1876, 1968.
  • J. Peschon, D.W. Bree Jr, L.P. Hajdu, “Optimal power-flow solutions for power system planning”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 60, pp. 64–70, 1972.
  • I. Marouani, T. Guesmi, H.H. Abdallah, A. Ouali, “Application of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for optimal location and parameters of FACTS devices considering the real power loss in transmission lines and voltage deviation buses”, Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, pp. 1–6, 2009. Q.H. Wu, Z. Lu, M.S. Li, T.Y. Ji, “Optimal placement of FACTS devices by a group search optimizer with multiple producer”, Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1033–1039, 2008.
  • M. Saravanan, S.M.R. Slochanal, P. Venkatesh, J.P.S. Abraham, “Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 77, pp. 276–283, 2007.
  • A. Deihimi, H. Javaheri, “A fuzzy multi-objective multi-case genetic-based optimization for allocation of FACTS devices to improve system static security, power loss and transmission line voltage profiles”, International Review of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 5, pp. 1616–1626, 2010.
  • R. Benabid, M. Boudour, M.A. Abido, “Optimal placement of FACTS devices for multiobjective voltage stability problem”, Proceedings of the IEEE PES Power Systems Conference & Exhibition, pp. 1–11, 2009.
  • A. Laifa, M. Boudour, “FACTS allocation for power systems voltage stability enhancement using MOPSO”, Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, pp. 1–6, 2008.
  • K.Y. Lee, M.M. Farsangi, H. Nezamabadi-pour, “Hybrid of analytical and heuristic techniques for FACTS devices in transmission systems”, Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, pp. 1–8, 2007.
  • D. Radu, Y. Besanger, “A multi-objective genetic algorithm approach to optimal allocation of multi-type FACTS devices for power systems security”, Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, pp. 1–8, 200 M. Gitizadeh, M. Kalantar, “A novel approach for optimum allocation of FACTS devices using multi-objective function”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 50, pp. 682–690, 2009.
  • W. Ongsakul, P. Jirapong, “Optimal allocation of FACTS devices to enhance total transfer capability using evolutionary programming”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 4175–4178, 2005.
  • R.A. Hooshmand, M. Ezatabadi Pour, “Corrective action planning considering FACTS allocation and optimal load shedding using bacterial foraging oriented by particle swarm optimization algorithm”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Vol. 18, pp. 597–612, 2010.
  • G. Mavrotas, Generation of efficient solutions in multiobjective mathematical programming problems using GAMS, effective implementation of the ε -constraint method (online). Available at: http://www.gams.com/modlib/adddocs/epscm.pdf. General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS), 2010. Available at: http://www.gams.com.
  • L.J. Cai, I. Erlich, “Optimal choice and allocation of FACTS devices using genetic algorithm”, Proceedings on 12th Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems Conference, pp. 1–6, 2003.
  • D. Bonmann, Technical information on the ABB phase shifting transformer, 2001. Available at: dietrich.bonmann@de.abb.com.
  • J.L. Cohon, Multiobjective Programming and Planning, New York, Academic Press, 1978.
  • G. Mavrotas, “Effective implementation of the ε -constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 213, pp. 455–465, 2009.
  • Power Systems Test Case Archive, 2008. Available at: http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca.