Improved analytical modulation transfer function for image intensified charge coupled devices*

The basic problem of simulation and modeling of Image Intensified Charge Coupled Device (ICCD) is the difference between the analytical Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) formulation used in the model and the experimentally obtained MTF. An investigation into the MTF of ICCD sub-components reveal that the MTF of the Image Intensifier Tube (IIT) is the main factor in this deviation. In this study, a regulation factor for the MTF of 3rd generation IITs has been developed. A commonly used MTF formulation for IITs has been modified to include a regulation factor which has helped produce more precise MTF values for the Night Vision Sight (NVS) device. The results obtained through the new formulation have been compared with the experimental results and it is revealed that the proposed formulation yields MTF values within 3% of the experimental results, on average, while the most commonly used formulation produces approximately 29.5% difference, which amounts to almost 10% improvement in analytical analysis. The analysis is then extended to other generations of IITs where similar improvements have been achieved.

Improved analytical modulation transfer function for image intensified charge coupled devices*

The basic problem of simulation and modeling of Image Intensified Charge Coupled Device (ICCD) is the difference between the analytical Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) formulation used in the model and the experimentally obtained MTF. An investigation into the MTF of ICCD sub-components reveal that the MTF of the Image Intensifier Tube (IIT) is the main factor in this deviation. In this study, a regulation factor for the MTF of 3rd generation IITs has been developed. A commonly used MTF formulation for IITs has been modified to include a regulation factor which has helped produce more precise MTF values for the Night Vision Sight (NVS) device. The results obtained through the new formulation have been compared with the experimental results and it is revealed that the proposed formulation yields MTF values within 3% of the experimental results, on average, while the most commonly used formulation produces approximately 29.5% difference, which amounts to almost 10% improvement in analytical analysis. The analysis is then extended to other generations of IITs where similar improvements have been achieved.

___

  • Shannon R.R. (Editor), Wyant C.J. “Applied Optics and Optical Engineering” Academic Press, Chapter 6, 1980.
  • Biberman L.M. (Editor), “Electro-Optical Imaging: Systems Performance and Modeling”, SPIE Press, Chapters 4 and 5, 2000 .
  • Abbott F. “The Theory of MTF ”, MTF Measurement Equipment The Optical Industry and Systems Purchasing Directory, pp 639-651, 1980.
  • Boreman G.D. “Modulation Transfer Function in Optical and Electro-Optical Systems” Tutorial Texts in Optical Engineer Volume TT52, SPIE Press, pp 85-101, 2001.
  • Holst G.C., “System MTF, CCD Array, Cameras and Display” ICO Publishing, pp 269, 1996.
  • Anonymous, “MIL-I-49453(CR) Image IntensiŞer Assembly 18 mm Microchannel Wafer MX-10130 ” USA Military SpeciŞcation, 1989.
  • Gul, N. and Efe, M., “Comparison of Human Eye, ICCD, CCD and Night Vision Devices and MTF Improvement ” thNational, Electro-Optical and Photonics Working Meeting (Unpublished), METU- Ankara-Turkey, December (in Turkish). Gul, N., Efe, M. and Larochelle, V., “Development of the Optical Transfer Function (OTF) For Image IntensiŞed CCD, Particularly With OTF Of Image IntensiŞer Tubes (IIT)” IEEE 25th Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel, pp. 36-40, December 2008.
  • Ientilucci E. J., “Synthetic Simulation and Modeling of Image IntensiŞed CCDs (IICCD)” M.Sc. Thesis, Center for Imaging Science in the College of Science Rochester Institute of Technology, 2000.
  • Williams George M., Morley M. Blouke, “Laser Focus World Magazine”, pp. 129- 136, September 1995. Appendix