Serkan ABBASOĞLU, Akinola Adeyinka BABATUNDE

Evaluation of field data and simulation results of a photovoltaic system in countries with high solar radiation

The objective of this study is to examine the conformity of different simulation tools in analyzing the performance of photovoltaic (PV) systems in countries with high solar radiation. Primarily an installed system was evaluated and the results were compared with the simulation results of 3 globally known PV software tools: pvPlanner, PVsyst, and Homer. The parameters evaluated in this study are energy production, specific yield, performance ratio, and capacity factor. Detailed explanations are presented for monthly, seasonal, and annual variation of installed system data and simulation results. Northern Cyprus is selected as a case study due to high solar radiation and duration values. The total annual energy production of the installed 5.76 kW system amounts to 12,216 kWh for the year studied. All the simulation tools appear to underestimate the installed system's energy production and the variances observed are 5.3{\%}, 9.3{\%}, and 7.5{\%} for pvPlanner, PVsyst, and Homer, respectively. Energy production in summer was observed to be about twice the production in winter. The percentage shares with respect to energy production are 34{\%}, 28{\%}, 22{\%}, and 16{\%} in summer, spring, autumn, and winter, respectively. The performance ratio of the system is 80.8{\%}. However, the average performance ratio of the 3 simulators was found to be 78.6{\%}. PVsyst modeled a performance ratio with the least deviation from the system with 79.2{\%}. The specific yield and capacity factor of the installed system are 2121 kWh/kW$_{p}$ and 25.06{\%}, respectively. The average specific yield value and average capacity factor of the 3 simulators are nearly 7{\%} lower than the measured data of the installed system. Different factors led to the difference between real-world application and simulation results. These are discussed in this study in detail.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Solar photovoltaics, energy production, performance ratio, specific yield, capacity factor, simulation tools

Evaluation of field data and simulation results of a photovoltaic system in countries with high solar radiation

Keywords:

Solar photovoltaics, energy production, performance ratio, specific yield, capacity factor, simulation tools,

PDF

___

Conclusion
C in summer and the subsequent heat generated was found to have an enormous negative eﬀect on PV modules. The annual energy production, specific yield, PR, and CF of the system at CYS were found to be 12,216 kWh, 2121 kWh/kWp, 80.8%, and 25.06%. These values are reasonable when compared with those from the literature.
All the modeling tools used in this study were found to be relatively accurate.
In addition to the conservative nature of the simulators’ mathematical algorithms, the diﬀerence in actual and simulated energy production can be traced to the use of meteorological data. This work predicts a best-case scenario performance for single-axis PV systems in Nicosia to be 11,320 kWh, 1963 kWh/kW, 78.6%, and 23.22% for the energy production, specific yield, PR, and CF, respectively.
Abbaso˘glu S, Demir G, Matur Z, T¨urkkan M, D¨u¸s¨unceli BY. Energy trend and energy eﬃciency in Turkish Republic of North Cyprus. In: 5th International Ege Symposium and Exhortation; June 2010. pp. 27–30.
Dunlop JP. Photovoltaic Systems. Orland Park, IL, USA: American Technical Publishers, 2010.
Marion B, Andelstein J, Boyle K, Hayden H, Hammond B, Fletcher T, Canada B, Narang D, Shugar D, Wenger H et al. Performance parameters for grid-connected PV system. In: 31st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference
and Exhibition; 3–7 January 2005; Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA. NREL/CP-520-37358.
Chioncel CP, Augustinov L, Chioncel P, Gilich N, Tirian GO. Acta Technica Corviniensis Bulletin of Engineering, Scientific Supplement of Annals of Faculty Engineering. Hunedoara International Journal of Engineering 2009; 7: 55–58.
Zinsser B, Makrides G, Schmitt W, Georghiou EG, Werner HJ. Annual energy yield of 13 photovoltaic technologies in Germany and Cyprus. In: Proceedings of the 22nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference; 2007. pp. 3114–3117.
Ibrahim D, Altunc M. Using solar energy in the cleaning of swimming pools in North Cyprus. Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment 2012; 3: 31–34.
Swapnil D, Jatin NS, Bhaharat S. Temperature dependent photovoltaic eﬃciency and its eﬀect on PV production in the world - a review. PV Asia Pacific Conference 2012. Energy Procedia 33: 311–321.
Trinuruk P, Sorapripatana C, Chenvidhya D. Estimating operating cell temperature of BIPV modules in Thailand. Renew Energ 2009; 34: 2515–2523.
Gottschalg R, Betts TR, Williams SR, Sauter D, Infield DG, Kearney MJ. A critical appraisal of the factors aﬀecting energy production from amorphous silicon photovoltaic arrays in a maritime climate. Sol Energy 2004; 77: 909–916.
Gottschalg R, Betts TR, Williams SR, Sauter D, Infield DG, Kearney MJ. The eﬀect of spectral variations on the performance parameters of single and double junction amorphous silicon solar cells. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 2005; 85: 415–428.
Makrides G, Zinsser B, Norton M, Georghiou GE, Schubert M, Werner JH. Potential of photovoltaic systems in countries with high solar irradiation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2010; 14: 754–762.
Pollikkas A. Parametric cost benefit analysis for the installation of photovoltaic parks in the island of Cyprus. Energ Policy 2009; 37: 3673–3680.
Faranda R, Gualdoni M, Leva S, Monaco M, Timidei A. Analysis of a PV system with single-axis tracking energy production and performances. In: IEEE International Conference on Clean Electrical Power; 2011. pp. 130–136.
Griﬃth JS, Rathod NS, Paslaski J. Temperature dependent photovoltaic (PV) eﬃciency and its eﬀect on PV production in the world. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference; Kissimmee, FL, USA; 1981. pp. 822–830.
Huld T, Gottschalg R, Bayer HG, Topic M. Mapping the performance of PV modules, eﬀects of module types and data averaging. Sol Energy 2010; 84: 324–338.
Sharma V, Kumar A, Sastry OS, Chandel SS. Performance assessment of diﬀerent photovoltaic technologies under similar outdoor conditions. Energy 2013; 58: 511–518.
Makrides G, Zinsser B, Norton M, Georghiou GE, Schubert M, Werner JH. Performance assessment of diﬀerent photovoltaic systems under identical field conditions of high irradiance. In: 4th Photovoltaic Science Application and Technology Conference; Edinburgh, UK. pp. 199–202.
Makrides G, Zinsser B, Norton M, Georghiou GE. Performance of photovoltaics under actual operating conditions. In: Fthenakis V, editor. Third Generation Photovoltaics. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, DOI 10.5772/27386.