Demand response in the day-ahead operation of an isolated microgrid in the presence of uncertainty of wind power

This paper explores the utilization of demand response in the day-ahead operation of an isolated microgrid in the presence of wind units. The operation of the network with high penetration wind units (i.e. uncertainty of wind units) is modeled as a unit commitment problem. In addition, electrical power storage is modeled in a daily power curve to decrease the effect of uncertainty in the wind units. Due to avoiding large-scale complexities and the deeper study effect of demand-side management on operations, the considered network is regarded as an isolated microgrid. The demand-side management is studied as demand shifting. The simulation results and discussion show the flexibility and advantages of the proposed method.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Microgrid operation, wind power, demand response, microgrid, uncertainty

Demand response in the day-ahead operation of an isolated microgrid in the presence of uncertainty of wind power

Keywords:

Microgrid operation, wind power, demand response, microgrid, uncertainty,

PDF

___

Conclusion
Anstine L, Burke R, Casey J, Holgate R, John R, Stewart H. Application of probability methods to the determination of spinning reserve requirements for the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland interconnection. IEEE T Power Ap Syst 1963; 82: 726–735.
Baldick R. The generalized unit commitment problem. IEEE T Power Syst 1995; 10: 465–475.
Cohen AI, Sherkat VR. Optimization-based methods for operations scheduling. P IEEE 1987; 75: 1574–1591.
Dillon TS, Edwin KW, Kochs HD, Taud R. Integer programming approach to the problem of optimal unit commitment with probabilistic reserve determination. IEEE T Power Ap Syst 1978; 97: 2154–2166.
Flynn M, Sheridan WP, Dillon JD, O’Malley MJ. Reliability and reserve in competitive electricity market scheduling. IEEE T Power Syst 2001; 16: 78–87.
Gooi H, Mendes D, Bell K, Kirschen D. Optimal scheduling of spinning reserve. IEEE T Power Syst 1999; 14: 1485–1492.
Guy JD. Security constrained unit commitment. IEEE T Power Ap Syst 1971; 90: 1385–1390.
Leffler LG, Chambliss R, Cucchi G, Reppen N, Ringlee R. Operating reserve and generation risk analysis for the PJM interconnection. IEEE T Power Ap Syst 1975; 94: 396–407.
Bouffard F, Galiana FD. An electricity market with a probabilistic spinning reserve criterion. IEEE T Power Syst 2004; 19: 300–307.
Bouffard F, Galiana F. Stochastic security for operations planning with significant wind power generation. IEEE T Power Syst 2008; 23: 306–316.
Parvania M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M. Demand response scheduling by stochastic SCUC. IEEE T Smart Grid 2010; 1: 89–98.
Wu L, Shahidehpour M, Fu Y. Security-constrained generation and transmission outage scheduling with uncertain- ties. IEEE T Power Syst 2010; 25: 1674–1685.
Shahidehpour M, Li T. Stochastic security-constrained unit commitment. IEEE T Power Syst 2007; 22: 800–811. [17] Wu L, Shahidehpour M, Li T. Cost of reliability analysis based on stochastic unit commitment. IEEE T Power Syst 2008; 23: 1364–1374. [18]Dietrich K, Latorre JM, Olmos L, Ramos A. Demand response in an isolated system with high wind integration. IEEE T Power Syst 2012; 27: 20–29.
Conejo AJ, Carri´on M, Morales JM. Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2010. [20] Papathanassiou S, Hatziargyriou N, Strunz K. A benchmark LV microgrid for steady state and transient analysis. CIGRE Symposium on Power systems with Dispersed Generation; 13–16 April 2005; Athens, Greece. Paris: CIGRE, 2005.
Tsikalakis AG, Hatziargyriou ND. Operation of microgrids with demand side bidding and continuity of supply for critical loads. Eur T Electr Power 2011; 21: 1238–1254.
Tsikalakis AG, Hatziargyriou ND. Centralized control for optimizing microgrids operation. IEEE T Energy Conver 2008; 23: 241–248.