Contrast enhancement using linear image combinations algorithm (CEULICA) for enhancing brain magnetic resonance images

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images support important information about brain diseases for physicians. Morphological alterations in brain tissues indicate the probable existence of a disease in many cases. Proper estimation of these tissues, measuring their sizes, and analyzing their image patterns are parts of the diagnosis process. Therefore, the interpretability and perceptibility level of the MRI image is valuable for physicians. In this paper, a new image contrast enhancement algorithm based on linear combinations is presented. The proposed algorithm is focused on improving the interpretability and perceptibility of the image information. An MRI image is presented to the algorithm, which generates a set of images from this MRI image. After this step, the algorithm uses the linear combination technique for combining the image set to generate a final image. Linear combination coefficients are generated using the artificial bee colony algorithm. The algorithm is evaluated by 4 different global image enhancement evaluation techniques: contrast improvement ratio (CIR), enhancement measurement error (EME), absolute mean brightness error (AMBE), and peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). During the evaluation process, 2 case studies are performed. The first case study is performed with 3 different image sets (T1, T2, and proton density) presented to the algorithm. These sets are obtained from the Brainweb simulated MRI database. The algorithm shows the best performance on the T1 image set with 5.844 CIR, 6.217 EME, 15.045 AMBE, and 22.150 dB PSNR scores as average values. The second case study is also performed with 3 different image sets (T1-fast low-angle shot sequence, T1-magnetization-prepared rapid acquired gradient-echoes (MP-RAGE), and T2) obtained from the The Multimedia Digital Archiving Systempublic community database. The algorithm performs best with the T1-MP-RAGE modality images with 6.983 CIR, 17.326 EME, 3.514 AMBE, and 30.157 dB PSNR scores as average values. In addition, this algorithm can be used for classification tasks with proper linear combination coefficients, for instance, segmentation of the white matter regions in brain MRI images.

Contrast enhancement using linear image combinations algorithm (CEULICA) for enhancing brain magnetic resonance images

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images support important information about brain diseases for physicians. Morphological alterations in brain tissues indicate the probable existence of a disease in many cases. Proper estimation of these tissues, measuring their sizes, and analyzing their image patterns are parts of the diagnosis process. Therefore, the interpretability and perceptibility level of the MRI image is valuable for physicians. In this paper, a new image contrast enhancement algorithm based on linear combinations is presented. The proposed algorithm is focused on improving the interpretability and perceptibility of the image information. An MRI image is presented to the algorithm, which generates a set of images from this MRI image. After this step, the algorithm uses the linear combination technique for combining the image set to generate a final image. Linear combination coefficients are generated using the artificial bee colony algorithm. The algorithm is evaluated by 4 different global image enhancement evaluation techniques: contrast improvement ratio (CIR), enhancement measurement error (EME), absolute mean brightness error (AMBE), and peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). During the evaluation process, 2 case studies are performed. The first case study is performed with 3 different image sets (T1, T2, and proton density) presented to the algorithm. These sets are obtained from the Brainweb simulated MRI database. The algorithm shows the best performance on the T1 image set with 5.844 CIR, 6.217 EME, 15.045 AMBE, and 22.150 dB PSNR scores as average values. The second case study is also performed with 3 different image sets (T1-fast low-angle shot sequence, T1-magnetization-prepared rapid acquired gradient-echoes (MP-RAGE), and T2) obtained from the The Multimedia Digital Archiving Systempublic community database. The algorithm performs best with the T1-MP-RAGE modality images with 6.983 CIR, 17.326 EME, 3.514 AMBE, and 30.157 dB PSNR scores as average values. In addition, this algorithm can be used for classification tasks with proper linear combination coefficients, for instance, segmentation of the white matter regions in brain MRI images.

___

  • K. Nakamura, E. Fisher, “Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images for measurement of gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis patients”, Neuroimage, Vol. 44, pp. 769–776, 2009.
  • J. Hwang, J. Kim, Y. Han, H. Park, “An automatic cerebellum extraction method in T1-weighted brain MR images using an active contour model with a shape prior”, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 29, pp. 1014–1022, 2011.
  • K. Van Leemput, F. Maes, D. Vandermeulen, A. Colchester, P. Suetens, “Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions by model outlier detection”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 20, pp. 677–688, 2001.
  • J. Xue, A. Pizurica, W. Philips, E. Kerre, R. Van De Walle, I. Lemahieu, “An integrated method of adaptive enhancement for unsupervised segmentation of MRI brain images”, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 24, pp. 2549– 2560, 2003.
  • A. Khademi, A. Venetsanopoulos, A. Moody, “Automatic contrast enhancement of white matter lesions in FLAIR MRI”, IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 322–325, 2009.
  • A. Majumder, S. Irani, “Contrast enhancement of images using human contrast sensitivity”, Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, pp. 69–76, 2006.
  • M.H. Kabir, M. Abdullah-Al-Wadud, O. Chae, “Brightness preserving image contrast enhancement using weighted mixture of global and local transformation functions”, Proceedings of the International Arab Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 7, pp. 403–410, 2010.
  • O. Kosheleva, J. Arenas, M. Aguirre, C. Mendoza, S.D. Cabrera, “Compression degradation metrics for analysis of consistency in microcalcification detection”, IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation, pp. 35–40, 1998.
  • R.L. Smathers, E. Bush, J. Drace, M. Stevens, F.G. Sommer, B.W. Brown, B. Kanas, “Mammographic microcal- cifications: Detection with xerography, screen-film and digitized film display”, Radiology, Vol. 159, pp. 673–677, 1986.
  • H.Y. Yang, Y.C. Lee, Y.C. Fan, H.W. Taso, “A novel algorithm of local contrast enhancement for medical image”, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vol. 5 pp. 3951–3954, 2007.
  • M. Vidaurrazaga, L.A. Diago, A. Cruz, “Contrast enhancement with wavelet transform in radiological images”, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vol. 3, pp. 1760–1763, 2000.
  • D. Karaboga, B. Gorkemli, C. Ozturk, N. Karaboga, “A comprehensive survey: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and applications”, Artificial Intelligence Review, pp. 1–37, 2012.
  • D. Karaboga, B. Akay, “A survey: algorithms simulating bee swarm intelligence”, Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 31, pp. 61–85, 2009.
  • S. Grgi´c, M. Grgi´c, M. Mrak, “Reliability of objective picture quality measures”, Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 55, pp. 3–10, 2004.
  • M. Sundaram, K. Ramar, N. Arumugam, G. Prabin, “Histogram modified local contrast enhancement for mammo- gram images”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 11, pp. 5809–5816, 2011.
  • Z. Wang, A.C. Bovik, “A universal image quality index”, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 9, pp. 81–84, 2002. [19] BrainWeb: Simulated Brain Database, http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/brainweb/, Last accessed: 03 June 2012.
  • C.A. Cocosco, V. Kollokian, R.K.S. Kwan, A.C. Evans, “BrainWeb: Online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database”, NeuroImage, Vol. 5, S 425, 1997.
  • R.K.S. Kwan, A.C. Evans, G.B. Pike, “MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 18, pp. 1085–1097, 1999.
  • R.K.S. Kwan, A.C. Evans, G.B. Pike, “An extensible MRI simulator for post-processing evaluation”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1131, pp. 135–140, 1996.
  • D.L. Collins, A.P. Zijdenbos, V. Kollokian, J.G. Sled, N.J. Kabani, C.J. Holmes, A.C. Evans, “Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 17, pp. 463–468, 1998.
  • E. Bullitt, D. Zeng, G. Gerig, S. Aylward, S. Joshi, J.K. Smith, W. Lin, M.G. Ewend, “Vessel tortuosity and brain tumor malignancy: a blinded study”, Academic Radiology, Vol. 12, pp. 1232–1240, 2005.