A new color image quality measure based on YUV transformation and PSNR for human vision system

Various methods for measuring perceptual image quality attempt to quantify the visibility of differences between an original digital image and its distorted version using a variety of known properties of the human vision system (HVS). In this paper, we propose a simple and effective full-reference color image quality measure (CQM) based on reversible luminance and chrominance (YUV) color transformation and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) measure. The main motivation of this new measure relies on a unique feature of the human eye response to the luminance and color. Experimental studies about the applicability of the CQM on a well-known test image under 6 different distortions, both perceivable by the human vision system and with the same PSNR value (i.e. 27.67), are presented. The CQM results are obtained as 39.56, 38.93, 38.08, 37.43, 37.10, and 36.79 dB for each distorted image, showing that image quality of the first image is noticeably higher than the others with respect to the same PSNR value. This conclusion attests that using the CQM together with the traditional PSNR approach provides distinguished results.

A new color image quality measure based on YUV transformation and PSNR for human vision system

Various methods for measuring perceptual image quality attempt to quantify the visibility of differences between an original digital image and its distorted version using a variety of known properties of the human vision system (HVS). In this paper, we propose a simple and effective full-reference color image quality measure (CQM) based on reversible luminance and chrominance (YUV) color transformation and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) measure. The main motivation of this new measure relies on a unique feature of the human eye response to the luminance and color. Experimental studies about the applicability of the CQM on a well-known test image under 6 different distortions, both perceivable by the human vision system and with the same PSNR value (i.e. 27.67), are presented. The CQM results are obtained as 39.56, 38.93, 38.08, 37.43, 37.10, and 36.79 dB for each distorted image, showing that image quality of the first image is noticeably higher than the others with respect to the same PSNR value. This conclusion attests that using the CQM together with the traditional PSNR approach provides distinguished results.

___

  • Z. Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.D. Sheikh, E.P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 13, pp. 600–612, 2004.
  • B. Girod, What’s Wrong With Mean-Squared Error, Digital Images and Human Vision, A.B. Watson, Ed., Cambridge, MA, USA, MIT Press, pp. 207–220, 1993.
  • Z. Wang, “Rate scalable foveated image and video communications”, PhD, Department of Electrical and Computing Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
  • A.M. Eskicioglu, P.S. Fisher, “Image quality measures and their performance”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 43, pp. 2959–2965, 1995.
  • Hecht Eugene, Optics, 2nd ed., Boston, Addison Wesley, 1987.
  • Georgia State University, The Rods and Cones of the Human Eye, available at http://hyperphysics.phyastr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/rodcone.html#c2. S. Candemir, Y.S. Akg¨ ul, “Statistical significance based graph cut regularization for medical image segmentation”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Vol. 19, pp. 957–972, 2011.
  • M.D. Hassan, “Comparison for steganalysis approaches”, MSc, Gazi University, Ankara, 2008.
  • E. Elba¸sı, “Robust multimedia watermarking: hidden Markov model approach for video sequences”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Vol. 18, pp. 159–170, 2010.
  • C. Christopoulos, A. Skodras, T. Ebrahimi, “The JPEG2000 still image coding system: an overview”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. 46, pp. 1103–1127, 2000.
  • Y. Chen, P. Hao, “Integer reversible transformation to make jpeg lossless”, IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Vol. 1, pp. 835–838, 2004.
  • M.J. Gormish, E.L. Schwartz, A. Keith, M. Boliek, A. Zandi, “Lossless and nearly lossless compression of highquality images”, SPIE/IS&T Conference on Very High Resolution and Imaging II, Vol. 3025, pp. 62–70, 1997. A. Mesut, “New methods in data compression”, PhD, Trakya University, Edirne, 2006.
  • H.T. Sencar, M. Ramkumar, A.N. Akansu, Data Hiding Fundamentals and Applications, New York, Elsevier Academic Press, 2004.
  • C.C. Chang, C.C. Lin, Y.H. Chen, “Reversible data-embedding scheme using differences between original and predicted pixel values”, IET Information Security, Vol. 2, pp. 35–46, 2008.
  • A.N. Netravali, B.G. Haskell, Digital Pictures: Representation, Compression and Standards”, New York, Plenum Press, 1995.
  • M. Rabbani, P.W. Jones, Digital Image Compression Techniques, Washington, SPIE Optical Engineering Press, 19 Freedom Scientific, Vision Loss Facts: Anatomy of the Eye, available at http://www.freedomscientific.com/resources/vision-anatomy-eye.asp. E.D. Montag, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science: Rods & Cones, available at http://www.cis.rit.edu/people/faculty/montag/vandplite/pages/chap 9/ch9p1.html. S.J. Williamson, H.Z. Cummins, Light and Color in Nature and Art, New York, Wiley, 1983.
  • C.W. Oyster, The Human Eye: Structure and Function, Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates, 1999. N. Ponomarenko, F. Silvestri, K. Egiazarian, M. Carli, V. Lukin, “On between-coefficient contrast masking of DCT basis functions”, 3rd International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics, pp. 1–4, 2007.