Anatomy of October 30, 2020, Samos (Sisam) –Kuşadası earthquake (MW 6.92) and its influence on Aegean earthquake hazard

Anatomy of October 30, 2020, Samos (Sisam) –Kuşadası earthquake (MW 6.92) and its influence on Aegean earthquake hazard

We investigated rupture geometry, size, and slip distribution of October 30, 2020, Samos (Sisam)–Kuşadası earthquake combining seismographs, GPS measurements, and SAR analysis. Right after the earthquake, we measured 13 additional campaignbased GPS sites to intensify the available GPS network consisting of 10 continuous stations. We combined all available seismographs to have the best possible accuracy for mainshock and aftershock hypocenter locations. We compiled all available seismic profiles and integrated them using high-resolution bathymetry to map seismically active faults. The mainshock hypocenter is located at 37.913 ± 0.009 N° and 26.768 ± 0.017 E° and a depth of 12.3 ± 1.7 km. Our fault plane solution shows that the mainshock has almost a pure normal-type mechanism. Based on accurate aftershock locations as well as InSAR results, the mainshock rupture is subsegmented with two north-dipping rupture planes. The rupture probably starts on a low angle plane generating 1.1 m average slip between the depths of 9–14 km. It merges to a steep plane at 9 km depth where it generates 1.2 m average slip extending towards the surface near the shoreline of Samos (Sisam) Island. Total size of the two rupture planes and their average slips determine that the magnitude of the mainshock is (Mw) 6.92 ± 0.02. The mainshock has substantially increased Coulomb stress on several fault segments near the towns Kuşadası and Söke, which have the potentials to generate strong earthquakes. It also nonnegligibly increased Coulomb stress on several fault segments south of İzmir giving a warning for increased earthquake hazard in this highly inhabited area.

___

  • Akinci A, Cheloni D, Dindar AA (2021). The 30 October 2020, M7.0 Samos Island (Eastern Aegean Sea) Earthquake: effects of source rupture, path and local-site conditions on the observed and simulated ground motions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1-27. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-215817/v1
  • Aktuğ B, Kılıçoğlu A (2006). Recent crustal deformation of Izmir, Western Anatolia and surrounding regions as deduced from repeated GPS measurements and strain field. Journal of Geodynamics 41 (5): 471-484.
  • Bouchon M (1997). The state of stress on some faults of the San Andreas system as inferred from near-field strong motion data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 102 (B6): 11731-11744.
  • Bulut F, Bohnhoff M, Ellsworth WL, Aktar M, Dresen G (2009). Microseismicity at the North Anatolian fault in the Sea of Marmara offshore Istanbul, NW Turkey. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 114 (B9).
  • Chen CW (2001). Statistical-cost network-flow approaches to twodimensional phase unwrapping for radar interferometry. PhD, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Demir A, Çiftçioğlu A.Ö, Sınır B.G, Başarı E, Doğan E, Nohutcu H. et al. (2020). İzmir (Seferihisar-Sisam) Depreminin Sismik Özellikleri ve Meydana Gelen Yapısal Hasarlara Ait İnceleme ve Değerlendirme Raporu. MCBU Civil Engineering Reports. MCBUCIVILENG.R-2020.2. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Manisa, Turkey: (in Turkish with an abstract in English). 118 s.
  • Dogru A, Gorgun E, Ozener H, Aktug B (2014). Geodetic and seismological investigation of crustal deformation near Izmir (Western Anatolia). Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 82: 21-31.
  • Eyidoğan H (2020). Report on the seismological characteristics and effects of the 30 October 2020 Samos-Kuşadası Bay earthquake (Mw7. 0) in the western Aegean Sea. ResearchGate Preprint.
  • Eyübagil EE, Solak Hİ, Kavak US, Tiryakioğlu İ, Sözbilir H et al. (2021) Present-day strike-slip deformation within the southern part of İzmir Balıkesir Transfer Zone based on GNSS data and implications for seismic hazard assessment, western Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 30 (2): 143-160. doi: 10.3906/ yer2005-26
  • Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R et al. (2007). The shuttle radar topography mission. Reviews of Geophysics 45 (2).
  • Ganas A, Elias P, Briole P, Tsironi V, Valkaniotis S et al. (2020). Fault responsible for Samos earthquake identified. Temblor. doi: 10.32858/temblor.134
  • Goldstein RM, Werner CL (1998). Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications. Geophysical Research Letters 25 (21): 4035-4038.
  • Gürçay S (2014). Sığacık Körfezi ve çevresinin denizaltı aktif tektoniğinin yüksek çözünürlüklü sismik yöntemler kullanılarak araştırılması. PhD, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Hager BH, King RW, Murray MH (1991). Measurement of crustal deformation using the Global Positioning System. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 (1): 351-382.
  • Kalogeras I, Melis NS, Kalligeris N (2020). The earthquake of October 30th, 2020 at Samos, Eastern Aegean Sea, Greece. Bruyère-le Châtel, France: The European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC).
  • Kanamori H (1983). Magnitude scale and quantification of earthquakes. Tectonophysics 93 (3-4): 185-199.
  • King GC, Stein RS, Lin J (1994). Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84 (3): 935-953.
  • Kuşçu İ, Öcal F, Kurtuluş O (2010). İzmir ve Sığacık Körfezleri’nde kıyı ötesi aktif faylar. MTA Rapor No: 11273. Ankara, Turkey: MTA, p. 98 (in Turkish).
  • Lienert BR, Havskov J (1995). A computer program for locating earthquakes both locally and globally. Seismological Research Letters 66 (5): 26-36.
  • Lykousis V, Anagnostou C, Pavlakis P, Rousaki G, Alexandri M (1995). Quaternary sedimentary history and neotectonic evolution of the eastern part of Central Aegean Sea, Greece. Marine Geology 128 (1-2): 59-71.
  • McClusky S, Balassanian S, Barka A, Demir C, Ergintav S et al. (2000). Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 105 (B3): 5695-5719.
  • Miranda N (2014). Definition of the TOPS SLC deramping function for products generated by the S-1 IPF. European Space Agency Technical Report. Paris, France: European Space Agency.
  • Nyst M, Thatcher W (2004). New constraints on the active tectonic deformation of the Aegean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 109 (B11).
  • Ocakoğlu N (2004). İzmir körfezi ve Alaçatı-Doğanbey-Kuşadası açıkları aktif tektoniğinin sismik yansıma verileri ile incelenmesi. PhD, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey.
  • Okada Y (1985). Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bulletin of the Seismological Sciety of America 75 (4): 1135-1154.
  • Papadimitriou P, Kapetanidis V, Karakonstantis A, Spingos I, Kassaras I et al (2020). First Results on the Mw = 6.9 Samos Earthquake of 30 October 2020. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece 56 (1): 251-279.
  • Reasenberg PA, Simpson RW (1992). Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the Loma Prieta earthquake. Science 255 (5052): 1687-1690.
  • Saatçılar R, Ergintav S, Demirbaş E, İnan S (1999). Character of active faulting in the North Aegean Sea. Marine Geology 160 (3-4): 339-353.
  • Sandwell D, Mellors R, Tong X, Xu X, Wei M et al. (2016). GMTSAR: An InSAR Processing System Based on Generic Mapping Tools. 2nd ed. Technical Report. La Jolla, CA, USA: Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
  • Sansosti E, Berardino P, Manunta M, Serafino F, Fornaro G (2006). Geometrical SAR image registration. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 44: 2861-2870.
  • Snoke JA (2003). FOCMEC: focal mechanism determinations. International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology 85: 1629-1630.
  • Sözbilir H, Softa M, Eski S, Tepe Ç, Akgün M, Ankaya Pamukçu O. et al (2020). 30 Ekim 2020 Sisam (Samos) Depremi (Mw: 6,9) Değerlendirme Raporu. DEÜ Deprem Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, 111 s.
  • Stiros S, Laborel J, Laborel-Deguen F, Papageorgiou S, Evin et al. (2000). Seismic coastal uplift in a region of subsidence: Holocene raised shorelines of Samos Island, Aegean Sea, Greece. Marine Geology 170: 41-58.
  • Styron R, Pagani M (2020). The GEM Global Active Faults Database. Earthquake Spectra 36(Suppl. 1): 160-180.
  • Toda S, Stein RS, Sevilgen V, Lin J (2011). Coulomb 3.3 Graphicrich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching—user guide. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1060, 63. Reston, VA, USA: U.S. Geological Survey.
  • Townend J, Zoback MD (2000). How faulting keeps the crust strong. Geology 28 (5): 399-402.
  • Wang L, Wang R, Roth F, Enescu B, Hainzl S et al. (2009). Afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation following the 1999 M 7.4 Izmit earthquake from GPS measurements. Geophysical Journal International 178 (3): 1220-1237.