Water management improvement in PEM fuel cells via addition of PDMS or APTES polymers to the catalyst layer

Water management is one of the obstacles in the development and commercialization of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Sufficient humidification of the membrane directly affects the PEM fuel cell performance. Therefore, 2 different hydrophobic polymers, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES), were tested at different percentages (5, 10, and 20 wt.%) in the catalyst layer. The solution was loaded onto the surface of a 25 BC gas diffusion layer (GDL) via the spraying method. The performance of the obtained fuel cells was compared with the performance of the commercial catalyst. Characterizations of each surface, including different amounts of PDMS and APTES, were performed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses. Molecular bond characterization was examined via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis and surface hydrophobicity was measured via contact angle measurements. The performance of the fuel cells was evaluated at the PEM fuel cell test station and the 2 hydrophobic polymers were compared. Surfaces containing APTES were found to be more hydrophobic. Fuel cells with PDMS performed better when compared to those with APTES. Fuel cells with 5wt.% APTES with a current density of 321.31 mA/cm2 and power density of 0.191 W/cm2 , and 10wt.% PDMS with a current density of 344.52 mA/cm2 and power density of 0.205 $W/cm^2$were the best performing fuel cells at 0.6V

PDF

___

1. Tiliakos A, Trefilov AM, Tanasă E, Balan A, Stamatin I. Laser-induced graphene as the microporous layer in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Applied Surface Science 2020; 504: 144096. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144096
2. Bezerra CW, Zhang L, Lee K, Liu H, Marques ABL et al. A review of Fe–N/C and Co–N/C catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochimica Acta 2008; 53 (15): 4937-4951. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.012
3. Cao TF, Lin H, Chen L, He YL, Tao WQ. Numerical investigation of the coupled water and thermal management in PEM fuel cell. Applied Energy 2013; 112: 1115-1125. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.031
4. Wee J-H, Lee K-Y, Kim SH. Fabrication methods for low-Pt-loading electrocatalysts in proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems. Journal of Power Sources 2007; 165 (2): 667-677. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.051
5. Das E, Yurtcan AB. Effect of carbon ratio in the polypyrrole/carbon composite catalyst support on PEM fuel cell performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2016; 41 (30): 13171-13179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.167
6. Mehta V, Cooper JS. Review and analysis of PEM fuel cell design and manufacturing. Journal of Power Sources 2003; 114 (1): 32-53. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00542-6
7. Kumar A, Zhang Y, Liu W, Sun X. The chemistry, recent advancements and activity descriptors for macrocycles based electrocatalysts in oxygen reduction reaction. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2020; 402: 213047. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213047
8. Rahimian P, Battrell L, Anderson R, Zhu N, Johnson E et al. Investigation of time dependent water droplet dynamics on porous fuel cell material via synchrotron based X-ray imaging technique. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 2018; 97: 237-245. doi: 10.1016/j. expthermflusci.2018.04.021
9. Ozden A, Shahgaldi S, Li X, Hamdullahpur F. A review of gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells—with a focus on characteristics, characterization techniques, materials and designs. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2019; 74: 50-102. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2019.05.002
10. Jiao K, Li X. Water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2011; 37: 221-291. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.002
11. Zhan Z, Wang C, Fu W, Pan M. Visualization of water transport in a transparent PEMFC. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37 (1): 1094-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.081
12. Cheah MJ, Kevrekidis IG, Benziger JB. Water slug to drop and film transitions in gas-flow channels. Langmuir 2013; 29 (48): 15122-15136. doi: 10.1021/la403057k
13. Dicks AL, Rand DA. Fuel cell systems explained. UK: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2018
14. Öztürk A, Yurtcan AB. Effect of calcination temperature on hydrophobicity of microporous layers prepared with two different molecular weights of PDMS polymer on PEM fuel cell performance with low Pt loading. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2017; 42 (9): 6250-6261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.041
15. Park GG, Sohn YJ, Yang TH, Yoon YG, Lee WY et al. Effect of PTFE contents in the gas diffusion media on the performance of PEMFC. Journal of Power Sources 2004; 131 (1-2): 182-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.037
16. Lim C, Wang CY. Effects of hydrophobic polymer content in GDL on power performance of a PEM fuel cell. Electrochimica Acta 2004; 49 (24): 4149-4156. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.04.009
17. Lin G, Van Nguyen T. Effect of thickness and hydrophobic polymer content of the gas diffusion layer on electrode flooding level in a PEMFC. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2005; 152 (10): 1942-1948. doi: 10.1149/1.2006487
18. Velayutham G, Kaushik J, Rajalakshmi N, Dhathathreyan KS. Effect of PTFE content in gas diffusion media and microlayer on the performance of PEMFC tested under ambient pressure. Fuel Cells 2007; 7 (4): 314-318. doi: 10.1002/fuce.200600032
19. Nguyen TV, Natarajan D, Jain R. Optimized catalyst layer structure for PEM fuel cells. ECS Transactions 2006; 1 (6): 501-508. doi: 10.1149/1.2214520
20. Friedmann R, Van Nguyen T. Optimization of the cathode catalyst layer composition using a novel 2-step preparation method. ECS Transactions 2008; 16 (2): 2021-2029. doi: 10.1149/1.2982042
21. Friedmann R, Van Nguyen T. Optimization of the microstructure of the cathode catalyst layer of a PEMFC for two-phase flow. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2010; 157 (2): B260-B265. doi: 10.1149/1.3264628
22. Avcioglu GS, Ficicilar B, Bayrakceken A, Eroglu I. High performance PEM fuel cell catalyst layers with hydrophobic channels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2015; 40 (24): 7720-7731. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.004
23. Moreira J, Ocampo A, Sebastian P, Smit MA, Salazar MD et al. Influence of the hydrophobic material content in the gas diffusion electrodes on the performance of a PEM fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2003; 28 (6): 625-627. doi: 10.1016/S0360- 3199(02)00143-X
24. Cabasso I, Yuan Y, Xu X. Gas diffusion electrodes based on poly (vinylidene fluoride) carbon blends. Google Patents, 1998. Patent Number: 5,783,325.
25. Salahuddin M, Uddin MN, Hwang G, Asmatulu R. Superhydrophobic PAN nanofibers for gas diffusion layers of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for cathodic water management. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2018; 43 (25): 11530-11538. doi: 10.1016/j. ijhydene.2017.07.229
26. Paul DR, Mark JE. Fillers for polysiloxane (“silicone”) elastomers. Progress in Polymer Science 2010; 35 (7): 893-901. doi: 10.1016/j. progpolymsci.2010.03.004
27. Rogers JA, Nuzzo RG. Recent progress in soft lithography. Materials Today 2005; 8 (2): 50-56. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(05)00702-9
28. Zeng X, Xu G, Gao Y, An Y. Surface wettability of (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane self-assembled monolayers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2011; 115 (3): 450-454. doi: 10.1021/jp109259b
29. Arslan G, Özmen M, Gündüz B, Zhang X, Ersöz M. Surface modification of glass beads with an aminosilane monolayer. Turkish Journal of Chemistry 2006; 30 (2): 203-210.
30. Ungan H, Bayrakçeken Yurtcan A. PEMFC catalyst layer modification with the addition of different amounts of PDMS polymer in order to improve water management. International Journal of Energy Research 2019; 43: 5946-5958. doi: 10.1002/er.4704
31. Jankauskaitė V, Narmontas P, Lazauskas A. Control of polydimethylsiloxane surface hydrophobicity by plasma polymerized hexamethyldisilazane deposition. Coatings 2019; 9 (1): 36. doi: 10.3390/coatings9010036
32. Stafie N, Stamatialis D, Wessling M. Effect of PDMS cross-linking degree on the permeation performance of PAN/PDMS composite nanofiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology 2005; 45 (3): 220-231. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.04.001
33. Li K, Zeng X, Li H, Lai X, Xie H. Effects of calcination temperature on the microstructure and wetting behavior of superhydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane/silica coating. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2014; 445: 111-118. doi: 10.1016/j. colsurfa.2014.01.024
34. Wang L, Ye Y, Lu X, Wen Z, Li Z et al. Hierarchical nanocomposites of polyaniline nanowire arrays on reduced graphene oxide sheets for supercapacitors. Scientific Reports 2013; 3: 3568 (1-9). doi: 10.1038/srep03568
35. Aneja KS, Bohm S, Khanna A, Bohm HM. Graphene based anticorrosive coatings for Cr (VI) replacement. Nanoscale 2015; 7 (42): 17879- 17888. doi: 10.1039/c5nr04702a
36. Park SB, Park Y. Fabrication of gas diffusion layer (GDL) containing microporous layer using flourinated ethylene prophylene (FEP) for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). International Journal of Precision Engineering And Manufacturing 2012; 13 (7): 1145- 1151. doi: 10.1007/s12541-012-0152-x
37. Shahgaldi S, Ozden A, Li X, Hamdullahpur F. A novel membrane electrode assembly design for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Characterization and performance evaluation. Electrochimica Acta 2019; 299: 809-819. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.01.064
38. Shang X, Zhu Y, Li Z. Surface modification of silicon carbide with silane coupling agent and hexadecyl iodiele. Applied Surface Science 2017; 394: 169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.102
39. Radev I, Koutzarov K, Pfrang A, Tsotridis G. The influence of the membrane thickness on the performance and durability of PEFC during dynamic aging. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37 (16): 11862-11870. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.027
40. Park S, Lee JW, Popov BN. Effect of carbon loading in microporous layer on PEM fuel cell performance. Journal of Power Sources 2006; 163 (1): 357-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.020
41. Martin AJ, Chaparro AM, Gallardo B, Folgado MA, Daza L. Characterization and single cell testing of Pt/C electrodes prepared by electrodeposition. Journal of Power Sources 2009; 192: 14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.104
42. Martin S, Garcia-Ybarra PL, Castillo JL. Electrospray deposition of catalyst layers with ultra-low Pt loadings for PEM fuel cells cathodes. Journal of Power Sources 2010; 195: 2443-2449. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.092
43. Avcioglu GS, Ficicilar B, Eroglu İ. Effect of PTFE nanoparticles in catalyst layer with high Pt loading on PEM fuel cell performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2016; 41: 10010-10020.