Djakovıc Tatjana SEKULIC, Costel SARBU, Perisic Nada JANJIC, Lozanov Zagorka CRVENKOVIC

Quantitative structure-retention study of some 2,4-dioksotetrahydro-1,3-thiazole derivatives using the partial least squares method

Thin-layer chromatography on rice starch support and aqueous ammonia–organic modifier (methanol, dioxane, and acetone) mobile phases was used to study the effect on retention of the chromatographic system and the physicochemical properties of twelve 2,4-dioxotetrahydro-1,3-thiazoles. A multivariate approach to the retention behaviour of the investigated compounds with 3 quite different organic solvents was used to explain the interactions between the 1,3-thiazoles and the mobile phases. Partial least-squares (PLS) regression was used to quantify differences between the observed data and recognize the molecular properties with the greatest effect on retention for each modifier. Good correlation was obtained between experimental and calculated retention data.

PDF

___

1. A. Andreani, M. Granaiola, M. Guardigli, A. Leoni, A. Locatelli, R. Morigi, M. Rambaldi and A. Roda, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 40, 1331-34 (2005).
2. H-L. Liu1, Z. Li1 and T. Anthonsen, Molecules 5, 1055-61 (2000).
3. Gy. Vastag, E. Szöcs, A. Shaban and E. Kalman, Pure Appl. Chem 73, 1861-9 (2001).
4. J. J. Harnett, V. Roubert, C. Dolo, C. Charnet, B. Spinnewyn, S. Cornet, A. Rolland, J.-G. Marin, D. Bigg and P. Chabrier, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 157-60 (2004).
5. P. Vicini, A. Geronikaki, M. Incerti, B. Busonera, G. Poni, C. A. Cabras and P. La Colla, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11, 4785-9 (2003).
6. K.-Y. Jung, S.-K. Kim, Z.-G. Gao, A. S. Gross, N. Melman, K. A. Jacobson and Y.-C. Kim, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12, 613-23 (2004).
7. R. Kaliszan, Chem. Rev. 107, 3212–3246 (2007).
8. A. Nasal, D. Siluk, R. Kaliszan, Curr. Med. Chem. 10, 381-426 (2003).
9. S. K. Poole, C. F. Poole, J. Chromatogr. B 797, 3–19 (2003).
10. A. Leo and C. Hansch, D. Elkins, Chem. Rev. 71, 525-616 (1971).
11. W. J. Lyman, W. F. Reehl and D.H. Rosenblatt, ”Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Method”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.
12. R. F. Rekker and R. Mannhold, ”Calculation of Drug Lipophilicity”, VCH, Weinheim, 1992.
13. A. Chiriac, D. Ciubotariu and Z. Simon, ”QSAR-Quantitative Relationships”, Mirton Publishing House, Timi¸soara, 1995.
14. R. Kaliszan, Anal. Chem. 64, 619-31 (1992).
15. L.-G. Danielsson and Y.-H. Zhang, Trends Anal. Chem. 15, 188-96 (1996).
16. R. Kaliszan, Trends Anal. Chem. 18, 401-16 (1999).
17. M. C. Garcia Alvarez-Coque and J. R. Torres Lapasio, Trends Anal. Chem. 18, 533-43 (1999).
18. E. C. Bate-Smith, R. G. Westall, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 4, 427–440 (1950).
19. N. U. Perisic-Janjic, T. Lj. Djakovic and S. M. Petrovic, Chromatographia 40, 96-8 (1995).
20. http://www.tripos.com/software/alchemy.html
21. http://www.logp.com
22. http://www.statsoft.com
23. E. Brzezinska, G. Koska and K. Walczynski, J. Chromatogr. A 1007, 145-55 (2003).