Optimization of synthesizing glucose 1-phosphate by sodium tripolyphosphate as a phosphorus acylating agent using response surface methodology
With glucose as the starting material, sodium tripolyphosphate as the phosphorus acylating agent, and urea as the catalyst, glucose 1-phosphate was synthesized and its properties were analyzed. The synthesis conditions were selected according to the phosphorus content and optimized through the response surface methodology (RSM), based on a 3-level, 3-variable Box--Behnken experimental design. The results showed that the phosphorus content of glucose 1-phosphate was 8.12% using a reaction temperature of 70 °C, a molar ratio of glucose to sodium tripolyphosphate of 1.54:1, and catalyst amount of 3.7 g. It coincided well with the experimental value (8.34%). The structure of the product was confirmed by IR, UV, and 1H NMR spectra; electrical conductivity; TG; and DTA. The proposed method has high phosphorus content and low toxicity.
Optimization of synthesizing glucose 1-phosphate by sodium tripolyphosphate as a phosphorus acylating agent using response surface methodology
With glucose as the starting material, sodium tripolyphosphate as the phosphorus acylating agent, and urea as the catalyst, glucose 1-phosphate was synthesized and its properties were analyzed. The synthesis conditions were selected according to the phosphorus content and optimized through the response surface methodology (RSM), based on a 3-level, 3-variable Box--Behnken experimental design. The results showed that the phosphorus content of glucose 1-phosphate was 8.12% using a reaction temperature of 70 °C, a molar ratio of glucose to sodium tripolyphosphate of 1.54:1, and catalyst amount of 3.7 g. It coincided well with the experimental value (8.34%). The structure of the product was confirmed by IR, UV, and 1H NMR spectra; electrical conductivity; TG; and DTA. The proposed method has high phosphorus content and low toxicity.
___
- Bismut, H.; Plas, C. Biochem. J. 1991, 276, 577–582.
- Severn, W. B.; Furneaux, R. H.; Falshaw, R.; Atkinson, P. H. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 308, 397–408.
- Li, Z. Applied Chemical Industry 2010, 39, 1201–1206.
- Williams, D. L.; Mcnamee, R. B.; Jones, E. L. ; Pretus, H. A.; Ensley, H. E.; Browder, I. W.; Di Luzio, N. R. Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 219, 203–213.
- Hu, M.; Hu, W. W.; Xie, B. J. Res. Dev. 1990, 2, 8–14.
- Tsuhako, M.; Sueyoshi, C.; Baba, Y.; Miyajima, T.; Ohashi, S.; Nariai, H.; Motooka, I. Chem. Lett. 1987, 16, 1431–1434.
- Inoue, H.; Nakayama, H.; Tsuhako, M. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 324, 10–16.
- Zhang, L. X.; Zhang, T. F.; Li, L. Y., Eds., Methods and Techniques of Biochemical Experimentation. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China, 1997.
- Venter, G. PhD thesis, University of Florida, Florida, USA, 1998.
- Sharma, S.; Malik, A.; Satya, S. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1198 −120
- Chen, M. J.; Chen, K.; Lin, C. W. J. Food Eng. 2005, 68, 471 −4
- Azargohar, R.; Dahai, A. K. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2005, 85, 219 −2
- Liu, B. G.; Peng, J. H.; Wan, R. D.; Zhang, L. B.; Guo, S. H.; Zhang, S. M. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2011, 21, 673–678.
- Mead, R.; Pike, D. J. Biometrics 1975, 31, 803–851.
- Teruel, M. A.; Lane, S. I.; Mellouki, A.; Solignac, G.; Bras, G. L. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 3764–3772.
- Winning, H.; Viereck, N.; Salomonsen, T.; Larsen, J.; Engelsen, S. B. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1833–1841. Francioso, O.; Montecchio, D.; Gioacchini, P.; Cavani, L.; Ciavatta, C.; Trubetskoj, O.; Trubetskaya, O. Geoderma 2009, 152, 264–268.
- Magon, A.; Pyda, M. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 2558–2566.
- Ma, C. H.; Wang, S. Y.; Yang, L.; Zu, Y. G.; Yang, F. J.; Zhao, C. J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z. H. Chem. Eng. Process. 2012, 57–58, 59–64.
- Myers, R. H.; Montgomery, D. C. Response Surface Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 2002.