Soil-plant relations in the annual Gypsophila (Caryopyhllaceae) taxa of Turkey

The soil properties of the annual Gypsophila L. taxa of Turkey and their effects on plant morphology were investigated. The taxa studied were Gypsophila heteropoda Freyn & Sint., G. parva Barkoudah, G. elegans M.Bieb., G. bitlisensis Barkoudah, G. viscosa Murray, G. antari Post & Beauverd, G. muralis L., G. tubulosa (Jaub. & Spach) Boiss., G. confertifolia Hub.-Mor., and G. pilosa Hudson. The soils of the plant taxa were medium textured, sand or sandy-loam, saltless or a little salty, neutral, limy, rich in potassium and with very little phosphorous, and with medium levels of nitrogen and organic matter. G. antari, which had the greatest lime content, had the lowest number of leaves. G. muralis and G. tubulosa had the lowest saturation values and lime content but the greatest number of leaves. If the lime content increased, the development of roots decreased, and when the rate of sand increased, the development of roots increased. For G. muralis, phosphorus concentration, seed size, and salt content were negatively related to number of leaves. For G. tubulosa and G. antari, potassium and organic matter concentrations were negatively related to number of leaves. In G. muralis, salt content was positively related to calyx diameter and seed size. In G. confertifolia, organic matter content was positively correlated with height of the calyx, petal, and bract. It was observed that G. pilosa, G. bitlisensis, and G. viscosa species are also distributed in limeless steppe areas. The most important distribution areas of the species in Turkey are Sivas, Erzincan, Çankırı, Eskişehir, and Ankara.

Soil-plant relations in the annual Gypsophila (Caryopyhllaceae) taxa of Turkey

The soil properties of the annual Gypsophila L. taxa of Turkey and their effects on plant morphology were investigated. The taxa studied were Gypsophila heteropoda Freyn & Sint., G. parva Barkoudah, G. elegans M.Bieb., G. bitlisensis Barkoudah, G. viscosa Murray, G. antari Post & Beauverd, G. muralis L., G. tubulosa (Jaub. & Spach) Boiss., G. confertifolia Hub.-Mor., and G. pilosa Hudson. The soils of the plant taxa were medium textured, sand or sandy-loam, saltless or a little salty, neutral, limy, rich in potassium and with very little phosphorous, and with medium levels of nitrogen and organic matter. G. antari, which had the greatest lime content, had the lowest number of leaves. G. muralis and G. tubulosa had the lowest saturation values and lime content but the greatest number of leaves. If the lime content increased, the development of roots decreased, and when the rate of sand increased, the development of roots increased. For G. muralis, phosphorus concentration, seed size, and salt content were negatively related to number of leaves. For G. tubulosa and G. antari, potassium and organic matter concentrations were negatively related to number of leaves. In G. muralis, salt content was positively related to calyx diameter and seed size. In G. confertifolia, organic matter content was positively correlated with height of the calyx, petal, and bract. It was observed that G. pilosa, G. bitlisensis, and G. viscosa species are also distributed in limeless steppe areas. The most important distribution areas of the species in Turkey are Sivas, Erzincan, Çankırı, Eskişehir, and Ankara.

___

  • Akçin ÖE & Engin A (2005). The morphological, anatomical and ecological properties of endemic Onosma bracteosum Hausskn. & Bornm. (Boraginaceae) species. Turkish Journal of Botany 29: 317–325.
  • Arslan I, Çelik A & Jang HC (2012). A cytotoxic triterpenoid saponin from under-ground parts of Gypsophila pilulifera Boiss.& Heldr. Fitoterapia 83: 699–703.
  • Ataşlar E (2001). Ecological Features of Some Gypsophila L. Species. In: The Proceedings of the Second Balkan Botanical Congress, İstanbul (Turkey) 14–18 May 2000, 1: 107–110.
  • Ataşlar E & Ocak A 2005. Gypsophila osmangaziensis (Caryophylaceae), a new species from Central Anatolia Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici 42: 57–60.
  • Babaoğlu MS, Gezgin A, Topal B, Sade B & Dural H (2004). Gypsophila sphaerocephala Fenzl ex Tchihat. A boron hyperaccumulator plant species that may phytoremediate soils with toxic B levels. Turkish Journal of Botany 28: 273–278.
  • Bai H, Zhong Y, Xie YY, Wang Y-S, Liu L & Zhou L (2007). A major triterpenoid saponin from Gypsophila oldhamiana. Chemistry & Biodiversity 4: 955–60.
  • Çağlar KÖ (1949). Toprak Bilgisi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları 10 (in Turkish).
  • Darwent AL & Coupland RT (1966). Life history of Gypsophila paniculata. Weeds 14: 313–318.
  • Darwent AL (1975). The biology of Canadian weeds. 14. Gypsophila paniculata L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55: 1049–58.
  • Doll EC & Lucas RE (1973). Testing soils for potassium, calcium and magnesium. Soil Science Society of America Journal, Wisconsin, USA.
  • El Naggar SM (2004). The seed coat and pollen morphology of Gypsophila pilosa (Caryophyllaceae). Flora Mediterranea 14: 109–114.
  • Ekim T, Koyuncu M, Vural M, Duman H, Aytaç Z & Adıgüzel N (2000). Türkiye Bitkileri Kırmızı Kitabı. Türkiye Tabiatını Koruma Derneği & Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Ankara (in Turkish).
  • El Bary A & Nour SA (1979). Correlation between the spermicidal activity and haemolytic index of certain saponins. Pharmazie 34: 560–561.
  • Erdin E (1991). Toprağın Fonksiyonları ve Koruma Stratejileri, Ekoloji ve Çevre 1: 40–43.
  • Gökmen S (2007). Genel Ekoloji. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım (in Turkish).
  • Güleryüz G & Gökçeoğlu M (1994). Uludağ (Bursa) Alpin Bölgesi bazı bitki topluluklarında mineral azot oluşumu ve yıllık verim. Turkish Journal of Botany 18: 65–72.
  • Hamzaoğlu E, Koç M & Budak Ü (2011). A new species of (Caryophyllaceae) from East Anatolia (Turkey): Hamzaoğlu sp. nova. Turkish Journal of Botany 35: 67–70.
  • Hamzaoğlu E (2012). A new species of Gypsophila and a new name for Silene (Caryophyllaceae) from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 36: 135–139.
  • Han BH, Joung HY & Choi JK (1996). Effect of different sealing materials on CO 2 and ethylene concentration in culture vessel, and growth and vitrification of Gypsophila paniculata ‘Bristol Fairy’. Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science 37: 118–122.
  • Hindistan M & İnceoğlu İ (1962). Toprakta pH Tayini. Tarım Bakanlığı, Topraksu Genel Müdürlüğü, Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ankara: Teknik Yayınlar 10 (in Turkish).
  • Huber-Morath A (1967a). Gypsophila L. In: Davis PH (ed). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 2, pp. 149–171, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Huber-Morath A (1967b). Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung von Gyopsophila und Bolanthus in Anatolien. Bauhinia 2: 177–191. Kaya MD, İpek A & Öztürk A (2003). Effects of different soil salinity level on germination and seedling growth of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal Agriculture and Forestry 27: 221–227.
  • Korkmaz M & Özçelik H (2011a). Systematical and morphological characteristics of annual Gypsophila L. (Caryophyllaceae) taxa of Turkey. Biological Diversity and Conservation (Biodicon) 4: 79–
  • Korkmaz M & Özçelik H (2011b). Economic importances of Gypsophila L., Ankyropetalum Fenzl and Saponaria L. (Caryophyllaceae) taxa of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology 10: 9533–9541.
  • Korkmaz M & Özçelik H (2012). Habitat properties of annual Gypsophila L. (Caryophyllaceae) taxa of Turkey. Biological Diversity and Conservation (Biodicon) 5: 11–22.
  • Koyuncu M, Kılıç CS & Güvenç A (2008). Soaproot yielding plants of East Anatolia and their potential in nature. Turkish Journal of Botany 32: 489–494.
  • Kozuharova E, Balabanova V & Boev V (2011). In-situ and ex-situ morphological characters of Gypsophila trichotoma Wend. in Bulgaria Comptes rendus de l’Académie Bulgare des Sciences. Biologie Botanique 64: 523–528.
  • Özçelik H & Muca B (2010). Ankyropetalum Fenzl (Caryophyllaceae) cinsine ait türlerin Türkiye’deki yayılışı ve habitat özellikleri. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi (BİBAD) 3: 47–56 (in Turkish).
  • Özçelik H (2000). Studies on protections of endemic and rare plants of Lakes Region. Bulletin of Pure and Applied Science 19B: 93–116.
  • Özdemir C, Özkan M & Kandemir A (2010). The morphological and anatomical properties of Gypsophila lepidioides Boiss. (Caryophyllaceae) endemic to Turkey. International Research Journal of Plant Science 1: 69–74.
  • Özhatay N, Byfield A & Atay S (2005). Türkiye’nin 122 Önemli Bitki Alanı. İstanbul: Doğal Hayatı Koruma Derneği (in Turkish).
  • Pauthe-Dayde, Rochd D & Henry M (1990). Triterpenoid saponin production in callus and multiple shoot cultures of Gypsophila spp. Phytochemistry 29: 483–487.
  • Primorac M, Seculovic D & Antonic S (1985). In vitro determination of the spermicidal activity of plant saponins. Pharmazie 40: 5
  • Sekmen AH, Turkan I, Tanyolac ZÖ, Özfidan C & Dinc A (2012). Different antioxidant defense responses to salt stress during germination and vegetative stages of endemic halophyte Gypsophila oblanceolata Bark. Environmental and Experimental Botany 77: 63–76.
  • Sinkkonen A, Strömer R & Penttinen OP (2008). Low toxicant concentrations decrease the frequency of fast-growing seedlings at high densities of annual baby’s breath (Gypsophila elegans). Environmental Pollution 153: 523–525.
  • Sönmez S & Kaplan M (1997). Toprak tuzluluğunun bitki gelişimi üzerine etkileri. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 10: 323–335 (in Turkish).
  • Sameh SA, Samir A, Hessini K, H, Abdelly C, Lachaal M & Soltani A (2011). Effects of properties on water and mineral nutrition of Beta macrocarpa Guss. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43: 2861– 28
  • Sumaira S, Mir AK, Akbar AM & Asma J (2008). Pollen morphology of the Genus Silene (Silene-Caryopyllaceae) from Pakistan. Biological Diversity and Conservation (Biodicon) 1: 74–85.
  • Türkan I & Demiral T (2009). Recent developments in understanding salinity tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany 67: 2–
  • Tüzüner A (1990). Toprak ve Su Analiz Lab. El Kitabı. Ankara, Tarım Orman ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü (in Turkish).
  • Ülgen N & Ateşalp M (1972). Toprakta Bitki Tarafından Alınabilir Fosfor Tayini. Ankara: Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Topraksu Genel Müdürlüğü, Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları 21 (in Turkish).
  • Ünver T, Bozkurt O & Akkaya MS (2008). Identification of differentially expressed transcripts from leaves of the boron tolerant plant Gypsophila perfoliata L. Plant Cell Reports 27: 1411–1422.
  • Williams FN (1989). Revision of the specific forms of the Genus Gypsophila L. Journal of Botany 27: 321–329.
  • Yao S, Luo JG, Ma L & Kong LY (2011). Two new triterpenoid saponins from the roots of Gypsophila paniculata with potent α-glucosidase inhibition activity. Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines 9: 401–405.