Salicylic-acid-induced recovery ability in salt-stressed Hordeum vulgare plants

The recovery ability of barley plants from salt stress conditions was assessed using foliar application of salicylic acid (SA) in a study conducted under controlled conditions. The barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L. 'Reyhan') were subjected to saline water with varying salinity levels (tap water 0.67 dS m-1 as control, 3, 6, 9, and 12 dS m-1) from 14 to 42 days after sowing (DAS). Then the plants were subjected to recovery treatments for 4 weeks, from 42 to 70 DAS. The recovery treatments included: non-recovery (R0), irrigation with tap water (R1), and irrigation with tap water + 2 foliar applications of SA with a 1-week interval (R2). The results showed that salt stress decreased shoot and root dry weight, leaf K+ concentration, and photosynthesis rate, while it increased leaf Na+ concentration and free proline, soluble protein, and chlorophyll contents. These reductions were related directly to stress intensity. Both recovery treatments increased shoot dry weight, Na+ concentration, free proline, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic rate. Compensation of root dry weight losses due to salt stress was observed only in R1. However, for other measured traits recovery ability with R2 was greater than with R1. Overall, it appeared that although recovery treatments could not fully eliminate salt-induced damages, the recovery treatment with SA proved to be very effective in alleviating the adverse effects of salt stress on barley plants.

Salicylic-acid-induced recovery ability in salt-stressed Hordeum vulgare plants

The recovery ability of barley plants from salt stress conditions was assessed using foliar application of salicylic acid (SA) in a study conducted under controlled conditions. The barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L. 'Reyhan') were subjected to saline water with varying salinity levels (tap water 0.67 dS m-1 as control, 3, 6, 9, and 12 dS m-1) from 14 to 42 days after sowing (DAS). Then the plants were subjected to recovery treatments for 4 weeks, from 42 to 70 DAS. The recovery treatments included: non-recovery (R0), irrigation with tap water (R1), and irrigation with tap water + 2 foliar applications of SA with a 1-week interval (R2). The results showed that salt stress decreased shoot and root dry weight, leaf K+ concentration, and photosynthesis rate, while it increased leaf Na+ concentration and free proline, soluble protein, and chlorophyll contents. These reductions were related directly to stress intensity. Both recovery treatments increased shoot dry weight, Na+ concentration, free proline, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic rate. Compensation of root dry weight losses due to salt stress was observed only in R1. However, for other measured traits recovery ability with R2 was greater than with R1. Overall, it appeared that although recovery treatments could not fully eliminate salt-induced damages, the recovery treatment with SA proved to be very effective in alleviating the adverse effects of salt stress on barley plants.

___

  • Ahmad N, Wyn Jones RG (1979). Glycine betaine, proline and inorganic ion levels in barley seedlings following transient stress. Plant Sci Lett 15: 231–237.
  • Alarcon JJ, Sanchez-Blanco MJ, Bolarin MC, Torrecillas A (1993). Water relation and osmotic adjustment in Lycopersicum esculentum and L. pinnelli during short-term of salt exposure and recovery. Physiol Plant 89: 441–447.
  • Ashraf M, O’Leary JW (1999). Changes in soluble proteins in spring wheat stressed with sodium chloride. Biol Plantarum 42: 113–
  • Ashraf M, Tufail M (1995). Variation in salinity tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). J Agron Crop Sci 174: 351–362.
  • Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007). Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59: 206–216.
  • Ashraf M, Harris PJC (2004). Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci 166: 3–16.
  • Ashraf M, Athar HR, Harris PJC, Kwon TR (2008). Some prospective strategies for improving crop salt tolerance. Adv Agron 97: 45–110.
  • Ashraf M, Akram NA, Arteca RN, Foolad MR (2010). The physiological, biochemical and molecular roles of brassinosteroids and salicylic acid in plant processes and salt tolerance. Crit Rev Plant Sci 29: 162–190.
  • Bandurska H, Stroinski A (2005). The effect of salicylic acid on barley response to water deficit. Acta Physiol Plant 27: 379–386.
  • Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39: 205–207.
  • Bradford MM (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–54.
  • Deef HE (2007). Influence of salicylic acid on stress tolerance during seed germination of Triticum aestivum and Hordeum vulgare. Adv Biol Res 1: 40–48.
  • DeLacerda CF, Cambraia J, Oliva MA, Ruiz HA (2005). Changes in growth and in solute concentrations in sorghum leaves and roots during salt stress recovery. Environ Exp Bot 54: 69–76.
  • El-Tayeb MA (2005). Response of barley grain to the interactive effect of salinity and salicylic acid. Plant Growth Regul 42: 215–224.
  • Emam Y (2011). Cereal Production. 4th ed. Shiraz, Iran: Shiraz University Press.
  • Gorham RG, Papa R, Aloy-Leonard M (1994). Varietal differences in Na uptake in barley cultivars exposed to soil salinity or salt spray. J Exp Bot 45: 895–901.
  • Hameed M, Nawaz T, Ashraf M, Naz N, Batool R, Ahmad MSA, Riaz A (2013). Physioanatomical adaptations in response to salt stress in Sporobolus arabicus (Poaceae) from the Salt Range, Pakistan. Turk J Bot 37: 715–724.
  • Hussein MM, Balbaa LK, Gaballah MS (2007). Salicylic acid and salinity effects on growth of maize plants. J Agric Biol Sci 3: 321–328.
  • Kausar F, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2013). Protective role of foliarapplied nitric oxide in Triticum aestivum under saline stress. Turk J Bot 37 37: 1155-1165.
  • Khan W, PrJrithivira B, Smith A (2003). Photosynthetic responses of corn and soybean to foliar application of salicylates. J Plant Physiol 160: 485–492.
  • Khodary SEA (2004). Effect of salicylic acid on the growth, photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in salt-stressed maize plants. Inter J Agric Biol 6: 5–8.
  • Munns R (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25: 239–250.
  • Mutlu S, Karadağoğlu Ö, Atıcı Ö, Taşğın E, Nalbantoğlu B (2013). Time-dependent effect of salicylic acid on alleviating cold damage in two barley cultivars differing in cold tolerance. Turk J Bot 37: 343–349.
  • Nayyar H (2003). Accumulation of osmolytes and osmotic adjustment in water-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) as affected by calcium and its antagonists. Environ Exp Bot 50: 253–264.
  • Nikolaeva MK, Maevskaya SN, Shugaev AG, Bukhov NG (2010). Effect of drought on chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of three wheat cultivars varying in productivity. Russ J Plant Physiol 57: 87–95.
  • Noreen S, Ashraf M (2008). Alleviation of adverse effects of saltstress on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by exogenous application of salicylic acid: growth and photosynthesis. Pak J Bot 40: 1657–1663.
  • Ouerghi Z, Cornie G, Roudani M, Ayadi A, Bruifert J (2000). Effect of NaCl on the photosynthesis of two wheat species differing in their sensitivity to salt stress. J Plant Physiol 15: 519–527.
  • Pakniyat H, Kazemipour A, Mohammadi GA (2003). Variation in salt tolerance of cultivated (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wild (H. spontanum C. KOCH) barley genotypes from Iran. Iran Agric Res 22: 45–62.
  • Pardossi A, Malorgio F, Oriolo D, Gucci R, Serra G, Tognoni F (1998). Water relations and osmotic adjustment in Apium graveolens during long-term NaCl stress and subsequent relief. Physiol Plant 102: 369–376.
  • Pareek A, Singla SL, Grover A (1997). Salt responsive proteins/ genes in crop plants. In: Jaiwal PK, Singh RP, Gulati A, editors. Strategies for Improving Salt Tolerance in Higher Plants, New Delhi, India: Oxford and IBH Publication, pp. 365–391.
  • Parida AK, Dagaonkav VS, Phalak MS, Aurangabadkar LP (2008). Differential responses of the enzymes involved in praline biosynthesis and degradation in drought tolerant and sensitive cotton genotypes during drought stress and recovery. Acta Physiol Plant 30: 619–627.
  • Pirasteh-Anosheh H, Sadeghi H, Emam Y (2011). Chemical priming with urea and KNO 3 enhances maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) seed viability under abiotic stress. J Crop Sci Biotech 14: 289– 2
  • Pirasteh-Anosheh H, Emam Y (2012). Manipulation of morphophysiological traits in bread and durum wheat by using PGRs at different water regimes. J Crop Prod Process 5: 29–45.
  • Pirasteh-Anosheh H, Emam Y, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2012). Exogenous application of salicylic acid and chlormequat chloride alleviates negative effects of drought stress in wheat. Adv Stud Biol 11: 501–520.
  • Ranjbar G, Cheraghi SAM, Qadir M (2010). Yield response of different wheat genotypes in saline areas of lower Karkheh river basin of Iran. Am-Euras J Agric Environ Sci 8: 50–54.
  • Shakirova FM, Sakhabutdinova AR, Bozrutkova MV, Fatkhutdinova RA, Fatkhutdinova DR (2003). Changes in the hormonal status of wheat seedlings induced by salicylic acid and salinity. Plant Sci 164: 317–322.
  • Siddiqui ZS, Shaukat SS, Zaman AU (2006). Alleviation of salinityinduced dormancy by growth regulators in wheat seeds. Turk J Bot 30: 321–330.
  • Singh PK, Gautam S (2013). Role of salicylic acid on physiological and biochemical mechanism of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Acta Physiol Plant 35: 2345–2353.
  • Singh B, Usha K (2003). Salicylic acid induced physiological and biochemical changes in wheat seedlings under water stress. Plant Growth Regul 39: 137–141.
  • Szabados L, Savoure A (2009). Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Sci 15: 89–97.
  • Tadayon MR, Emam Y (2007). Physiological and morphological responses of two barley cultivars to salt stress and their correlation with grain yield. Agric Nat Res Sci Tech 11: 253– 2
  • Volkmar KM, Hu H, Stephun H (1997). Physiological responses of plants to salinity: a review. Can J Plant Sci 78: 19–27.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, antioxidant enzymes, and growth responses of Jatropha curcas during soil flooding

Krishan Kumar VERMA, Munna SINGH, Ramwant Kumar GUPTA, Chhedi Lal VERMA

Morphology and genetic affinities of a novel Chattonella isolate (Raphidophyceae) isolated from Iran’s south coast (Oman Sea)

Gilan ATTARAN-FARIMAN, Christopher John Stanley BOLCH

Does gypsum influence seed germination?

Eva M. CAÑADAS, Miguel BALLESTEROS, Francisco VALLE, Juan LORITE

Cytological evidence for gametophytic self-incompatibility in the genus Veronica

Romain SCALONE, Dirk ALBACH

Phytoplankton functional groups provide a quality assessment method by the Q assemblage index in Lake Mogan (Turkey)

Ayşe Nilsun DEMİR, Özden FAKIOĞLU, Berrin DURAL

The revision of the section Alopecuroidei of the genus Astragalus (Fabaceae) in Turkey

Hasan AKAN, Zeki AYTAÇ

Modulation of osmotic adjustment and enzymatic antioxidant profiling in Apera intermedia exposed to salt stress

Evren YILDIZTUGAY, Ceyda ÖZFİDAN KONAKÇI, Mustafa KÜÇÜKÖDÜK, Yağmur DURAN

Morphology, histochemistry, and ultrastructure of foliar mucilage-producing trichomes of Harpagophytum procumbens (Pedaliaceae)

Yougasphree NAIDOO, Samia HENEIDAK, Arvind BHATT, Nazeera KASIM, Gonasageran NAIDOO

A comparative study of taxonomy, physicochemical parameters, and chemical constituents of Ganoderma lucidum and G. philippii from Uttarakhand, India

Ranjeet SINGH, Gurpaul Singh DHINGRA, Richa SHRI

Micropropagation of Erodium sibthorpianum subsp. sibthorpianum, an endemic threatened species of Uludağ Mountain (Bursa-Turkey)

Betül AKIN, İsmail KOCAÇALIŞKAN, Gürcan GÜLERYÜZ