Pollen morphology of the genus Alchemilla L. (Rosaceae) in Iran

This paper reports the morphological characters of 18 Iranian species of the genus Alchemilla using light and scanning electron microscopy. The pollen grains are monad, radially symmetrical, isopolar, or subisopolar; small to medium in size; tri- and tetracolporate; rectangular to cylindrical (from equatorial view) and triangular to circular (from polar view) in outline; and prolate-spheroidal to subprolate and prolate in shape. The exine ornamentation is psilate and microechinate. Based on the exine sculpturing and microechinate distribution pattern, three main types, four subtypes, and two categories of pollen grains were recognized. We used cluster analysis and principal component analysis to determine the potential contribution of pollen morphological characters to the species relationships. Our findings revealed the significance of palynological evidence in explaining the species relationship. The results of two multivariate analyses showed a close affinity among the seven studied species (A.amardica, A. sericata, A. fluminea, A. kurdica, A. hyrcana, A. sedelmeyeriana, and A. pesudocartalinica).

Pollen morphology of the genus Alchemilla L. (Rosaceae) in Iran

This paper reports the morphological characters of 18 Iranian species of the genus Alchemilla using light and scanning electron microscopy. The pollen grains are monad, radially symmetrical, isopolar, or subisopolar; small to medium in size; tri- and tetracolporate; rectangular to cylindrical (from equatorial view) and triangular to circular (from polar view) in outline; and prolate-spheroidal to subprolate and prolate in shape. The exine ornamentation is psilate and microechinate. Based on the exine sculpturing and microechinate distribution pattern, three main types, four subtypes, and two categories of pollen grains were recognized. We used cluster analysis and principal component analysis to determine the potential contribution of pollen morphological characters to the species relationships. Our findings revealed the significance of palynological evidence in explaining the species relationship. The results of two multivariate analyses showed a close affinity among the seven studied species (A.amardica, A. sericata, A. fluminea, A. kurdica, A. hyrcana, A. sedelmeyeriana, and A. pesudocartalinica).

___

  • Asker SE, Jerling L (1992). Apomixis in Plants. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Buser R (1892). Nouvelle classification du genre Alchemilla. Bull Soc Bot Lyon 10: 34–35 (in French).
  • De Candolle AP (1825). Alchemilla. In: Prodr. Syst. Nat. Regn. Veg., vol. 2, Treuttel et Würtz, Paris, p. 590.
  • Eide F (1981). Key for northwest European Rosaceae pollen. Grana 20: 101–118.
  • Erdtman G (1952). Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist and Wiksells.
  • Eriksson T, Donoghue MJ, Hibbs MS (1998). Phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla using sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae). Plant Syst Evol 212: 155–179.
  • Eriksson T, Hibbs MS, Yoder AD, Delwiche CF, Donoghue MJ (2003). The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of chloroplast DNA. Int J Plant Sci 164: 197–211.
  • Focke WO (1888). Alchemilla. In: Engler A, Prantl K, editors. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Vol. 3. Berlin. p. 43 (in German).
  • Fröhner S (1969). Alchemilla (Rosaceae) Flora Iranica (ed. K. H. Rechinger). Vol. 66/30, pp. 124–147.
  • Fröhner SE (1995). Alchemilla. In: Scholz H, Conert HJ, Jäger EJ, Kadereit JW, Schultze-Motel W, Wagenitz G, Weber HE, editors. Hegi: Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, vol. 4 Teil 2B. Berlin, Germany: Verlag Paul Parey, pp. 13–242 (in German).
  • Gehrke B, Bräuchler C, Romoleroux K, Lundberg M, Heubl G, Eriksson T (2008). Molecular phylogenetics of Alchemilla, Aphanes and Lachemilla (Rosaceae) inferred from plastid and nuclear intron and spacer DNA sequences, with comments on generic classification. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47: 1030–1044.
  • Harley MM (1992). The potential value of pollen morphology as an additional taxonomic character in subtribe Ociminae (Ocimeae, Nepetoideae, Labiatae). In: Harley RM, Reynolds T, editors. Advances in Labiatae Science. Richmond, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 125–138.
  • Hayirlioglu-Ayaz S, Inceer H (2009). Three new Alchemilla L. (Rosaceae) records from Turkey.
  • Pak J Bot 41: 2093-2096.
  • Hebda RJ, Chinnappa CC (1990). Studies on pollen morphology of Rosaceae in Canada. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 64: 103–108.
  • Hebda RJ, Chinnappa CC, Smith BM (1988). Pollen morphology of the Rosaceae of western Canada. I1. Dryas, Fragaria, Holodiscus. Can J Bot 66: 595–612.
  • Horandl E (2004). Comparative analysis of genetic divergence among sexual ancestors of apomictic complexes using isozyme data. Int J Plant Sci 165: 615–622.
  • Izmailow R (1981). Karyological studies in species of Alchemilla L. from the Calycinae Bus. (Section Brevicaulon Rothm.). Acta Biol Cracov Bot 23: 117–180.
  • Juzepczuk SW (1941). Alchemilla L. In: Komarov VL, editor. Flora U.S.S.R., Izd. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R., Moskva. -Leningrad 13: 289–410.
  • Kalkman C (2004). Rosaceae: 13. Alchemilla group. In: Kubitzki K, editor. Flowering Plants. Dicotyledons: Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales, vol. 6. Berlin, Germany: Springer. pp. 371–372.
  • Khatamsaz M (1993). Flora of Iran: Rosaceae. Research Institute of forests and rangeland, Tehran, Iran. Vol. 6, pp. 88–140.
  • Lagerheim NG (1894). Ueber die andinen Alchemilla-Arten. Kongl. Svenska Vetensk Acad Handl 51: 15–18.
  • Murbeck S (1901). Pathogenetische Embribildung inder Gattung Alchemilla Lund Univ. Arssk. 36. Afd. 2. Nr.7.1-41.
  • Notov AA, Kusnetzova TV (2004). Architectural units, axiality and their taxonomic implications in Alchemillinae. Wulfenia 11: 85–130.
  • Punt W, Hoen PO, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Thomas AL (2007). Glossary of pollen terminology. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 143: 1–81.
  • Reitsma, T.J (1966). Pollen morphology of some European Rosaceae. Acta Bot Neerl 15: 290–307.
  • Rohlf FJ (1993). NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 1.80. Exeter Software: Setauket, New York.
  • Rothmaler W (1944). Zur nomenklatur der Europaischen Alchemilla-Arten. Svenska Botaniska Tidskrift 38: 102–112 (in German).
  • Ryan BF, Joiner BL (2001). MINITAB Handbook, Fourth Edition, Duxbury.
  • Schulz-Menz GK (1964). Rosales. In: Melchior H, editor. A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzen familien. Berlin, Germany: Borntraeger (in German).
  • Sepp S, Bobrova VK, Troitsky AK, Glazunova KP (2000). Genetic polymorphism detected with RAPD analysis and morphological variability in some microspecies of apomictic Alchemilla. Ann Bot Fennici 37: 105–123.
  • Soják J (2008). Notes on Potentilla XXI. A new division of the tribe Potentilleae (Rosaceae) and notes on generic delimitations. Bot Jahrb für Syst 127: 349–358.
  • Strasburger E (1905). Die Apogamic der Eualchemillen und allgemeine gesichtspinket die sich sus ihr ergben Jahrb. Wiss Bot 41: 88–164 (in German).
  • Ueda Y, Tomita H (1989). Morphometric analysis of pollen exine patterns in roses. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 58: 211–220.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK