Genetic diversity and agronomic performance of Slovenian landraces of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Genetic diversity and agronomic performance of Slovenian landraces of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) has many favored nutritional and agronomic traits, which makes it appropriate forcultivation and consumption all around the world. Genomic resources for proso millet are still very limited but the set of genomic datais improving. In this study, we genotyped six Slovenian landraces of proso millet (P. miliaceum L.) along with one Slovene autochthonouscultivar, Sonček. The chosen set of 11 SSR markers showed that there is low overall heterozygosity (0.561) among Slovenian landracesof proso millet. However, we were able to determine distinct groups on the dendrogram for different landraces and the cultivar byusing UPGMA clustering. The PCoA scatter plot showed dispersion of unique individuals. The SSR markers used proved to be efficientfor assessing the genetic diversity of Slovenian landraces of proso millet. Furthermore, we performed a 3-year field experiment anddetermined grain yield (ranging from 1032 to 1667 kg ha−1) and yield stability using Kang’s yield stability index (YSi). The morphologyof panicles and grain was described as well.

___

  • Ačko DK (2012). Importance and possibilities of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) production for human nutrition, and animal feed in Slovenia. J Food Agric Environ 10: 636-640.
  • Ačko DK, Šantavec I, Cvetkov M (2012). Production of common millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in Slovenia and effect of sowing time and sowing density on grain yield of the ‘Sonček’ cultivar. J Food Agric Environ 10: 417-422.
  • Agdag M, Nelson L, Baltensperger D, Lyon D, Kachman S (2001). Row spacing affects grain yield and other agronomic characters of proso millet. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32: 2021-2032.
  • Amadou I, Gounga ME, Le GW (2013). Millets: nutritional composition, some health benefits and processing - a review. Emirates J Food Agric 25: 501.
  • Baltensperger DD (1996). Foxtail and proso millet. In: Janick J, editor. Progress in New Crops. Alexandria, VA, USA: ASHS Press, pp. 182-190.
  • Bouchez A, Hospital F, Causse M, Gallais A, Charcosset A (2002). Marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines. Genetics 162: 1945-1959.
  • Camacho V, Taina C, Maxted N, Scholten M, Ford-Lloyd B (2005). Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genet Res 3: 373-384.
  • Caruso C, Maucieri C, Berruti A, Borin M, Barbera AC (2018). Responses of different Panicum miliaceum L. genotypes to saline and water stress in a marginal Mediterranean environment. Agronomy 8: 8.
  • Changmei S, Dorothy J (2014). Millet-the frugal grain. Int J Sci Res Rev 3: 75-90.
  • Cho YI, Chung JW, Lee GA, Ma KH, Dixit A, Gwag JG, Park YJ (2010). Development and characterization of twenty-five new polymorphic microsatellite markers in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Genes Genom 32: 267-273.
  • Dwivedi S, Upadhyaya H, Senthilvel S, Hash C, Fukunaga K, Diao X, Santra D, Baltensperger D, Prasad M (2012). Millets: genetic and genomic resources. In: Janick J, editor. Plant Breeding Reviews 35. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 247- 375.
  • FAO (2018). FAO Crop Production Statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization. Website http://faostat.fao.org/ [accessed 15 February 2018].
  • Frankel OH, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1998). The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goron TL, Raizada MN (2015). Genetic diversity and genomic resources available for the small millet crops to accelerate a New Green Revolution. Front Plant Sci 6: 157.
  • Habiyaremye C, Barth V, Highet K, Coffey T, Murphy KM (2017a). Phenotypic responses of twenty diverse proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) accessions to irrigation. Sustainability 9: 389.
  • Habiyaremye C, Matanguihan JB, Guedes JD, Ganjyal GM, Whiteman MR, Kidwell KK, Murphy KM (2017b). Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and its potential for cultivation in the Pacific Northwest, US: a review. Front Plant Sci 7: 1-17.
  • Hou S, Sun Z, Li Y, Wang Y, Ling H, Xing G, Han Y, Li H (2017). Transcriptomic analysis, genic SSR development, and genetic diversity of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum; Poaceae). Appl Plant Sci 5: 1-11.
  • Hu X, Wang J, Lu P, Zhang H (2009). Assessment of genetic diversity in broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) using SSR markers. J Genet Genomics 36: 491-500.
  • Hunt HV, Campana MG, Lawes MC, Park YJ, Bower MA, Howe CJ, Jones MK (2011). Genetic diversity and phylogeography of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) across Eurasia. Mol Ecol 20: 4756-4771.
  • IBPGR (1985). Descriptors for Panicum miliaceum and P. sumatrense, 19. Rome, Italy: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007). Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16: 1099- 1106.
  • Kuchel H, Ye G, Fox R, Jefferies S (2005). Genetic and economic analysis of a targeted marker-assisted wheat breeding strategy. Mol Breed 16: 67-78.
  • Kump B, Javornik B (1996). Evaluation of genetic variability among common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) populations by RAPD markers. Plant Sci 114: 149-158.
  • Li J, Das K, Liu J, Fu G, Li Y, Tobias C, Wu R (2012). Statistical models for genetic mapping in polyploids: challenges and opportunities. Methods Mol Biol 871: 245-261.
  • Liao L, Li T, Zhang J, Xu L, Deng H, Han X (2014). The domestication and dispersal of the cultivated ramie (Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud. in Freyc.) determined by nuclear SSR marker analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 61: 55-67.
  • Lister DL, Bower MA, Jones MK (2010). Herbarium specimens expand the geographical and temporal range of germplasm data in phylogeographic studies. Taxon 59: 1321-1323.
  • Liu M, Xu Y, He J, Zhang S, Wang Y, Lu P (2016). Genetic diversity and population structure of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) cultivars and landraces in China based on microsatellite markers. Int J Mol Sci 17: 370.
  • Lu H, Zhang J, Liu KB, Wu N, Li Y, Zhou K, Ye M, Zhang T, Zhang H, Yang X et al. (2009). Earliest domestication of common millet (Panicum miliaceum) in East Asia extended to 10,000 years ago. PNAS 106: 7367-7372.
  • Malik SS, Singh SP (2006). Role of plant genetic resources in sustainable agriculture. Ind J Crop Sci 1: 21-28.
  • Negri V, Maxted N, Veteläinen M (2009). European landrace conservation: an introduction. In: Veteläinen M, Negri V, Maxted N, editors. European Landraces: On-Farm Conservation Management and Use. Biodiversity Technical Bulletin 15. Rome: Bioversity International, pp. 1-22. FLAJŠMAN et al. / Turk J Bot 195
  • Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y (1983). Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol 19: 153-170.
  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006). Genalex 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295.
  • Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F (2003). Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC, editors. Genetic Diversity of Cultivated Tropical Plants. Montpellier: Enfield Science Publishers, pp. 43-76.
  • R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Website https://www.R-project.org/ [accessed 15 February 2018].
  • Rajput SG, Santra DK (2016). Evaluation of genetic diversity of proso millet germplasm available in the United States using simplesequence repeat markers. Crop Sci 56: 2401-2409.
  • Rajput SG, Santra DK, Schnable J (2016). Mapping QTLs for morpho-agronomic traits in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Mol Breeding 36: 37.
  • Sabir P, Ashraf M, Akram NA (2011). Accession variation for salt tolerance in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) using leaf proline content and activities of some key antioxidant enzymes. J Agron Crop Sci 197: 340-347.
  • Saha D, Gowda MC, Arya L, Verma M, Bansal KC (2016). Genetic and genomic resources of small millets. Crit Rev Plant Sci 35: 56-79.
  • Schmierer DA, Kandemir N, Kudrna DA, Jones BL, Ullrich SE, Kleinhofs A (2004). Molecular marker-assisted selection for enhanced yield in malting barley. Mol Breed 14: 463-473.
  • Seghatoleslami MJ, Kafi M, Majidi E (2008). Effect of drought stress at different growth stages on yield and water use efficiency of five proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes. Pak J Bot 40: 1427-1432.
  • Sikora V, Filipović V, Berenji J, Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y (1983). Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol 19: 153-170.
  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006). Genalex 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295.
  • Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F (2003). Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC, editors. Genetic Diversity of Cultivated Tropical Plants. Montpellier: Enfield Science Publishers, pp. 43-76.
  • R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Website https://www.R-project.org/ [accessed 15 February 2018].
  • Rajput SG, Santra DK (2016). Evaluation of genetic diversity of proso millet germplasm available in the United States using simplesequence repeat markers. Crop Sci 56: 2401-2409.
  • Rajput SG, Santra DK, Schnable J (2016). Mapping QTLs for morpho-agronomic traits in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Mol Breeding 36: 37.
  • Sabir P, Ashraf M, Akram NA (2011). Accession variation for salt tolerance in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) using leaf proline content and activities of some key antioxidant enzymes. J Agron Crop Sci 197: 340-347.
  • Saha D, Gowda MC, Arya L, Verma M, Bansal KC (2016). Genetic and genomic resources of small millets. Crit Rev Plant Sci 35: 56-79.
  • Schmierer DA, Kandemir N, Kudrna DA, Jones BL, Ullrich SE, Kleinhofs A (2004). Molecular marker-assisted selection for enhanced yield in malting barley. Mol Breed 14: 463-473.
  • Seghatoleslami MJ, Kafi M, Majidi E (2008). Effect of drought stress at different growth stages on yield and water use efficiency of five proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes. Pak J Bot 40: 1427-1432.
  • Sikora V, Filipović V, Berenji J, Popović V (2013). Agro-biological traits of common millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes in regular and stubble crop. Ratar Povrt 50: 16-23.
  • Trivedi AK, Arya L, Verma M, Verma SK, Tyagi RK, Hemantaranjan A (2015). Genetic variability in proso millet [Panicum miliaceum] germplasm of Central Himalayan Region based on morpho-physiological traits and molecular markers. Acta Physiol Plant 37: 23.
  • Wang R, Hunt HV, Qiao Z, Wang L, Han Y (2016). Diversity and cultivation of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in China: a review. Econ Bot 70: 1-11.
  • Wright S (1965). The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
  • Wright S (1978). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Variability Within and Among Natural Populations, Vol. 4. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press. Zeven AC (1998). Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104: 127-139.
  • Zhang L, Liu R, Niu W (2014). Phytochemical and antiproliferative activity of proso millet. PLoS One 9: e104058.
  • Zhang PP, Song H, Ke XW, Jin XJ, Yin LH, Liu Y, Qu Y, Su W, Feng NJ, Zheng DF et al. (2016). GGE biplot analysis of yield stability and test location representativeness in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes. J Integr Agric 15: 1218-1227.
  • Zhang QF, Gao YJ, Yang SH, Saghai Maroof MA, Li JX (1995). Molecular divergence and hybrid performance in rice. Mol Breed 1: 133-142.