Effect of Ozone on Induction of Resistance in Rhinacanthus nasutus (L.) Kurz. against Acute Ozone Exposure

Studies were undertaken for induction of resistance against acute ozone exposure in Rhinacanthus nasutus (L.) Kurz. plants using ozone. Callus induced from Rhinacanthus nasutus leaf explants on Murashige & Skoog's (MS) medium supplemented with 3.40 µM of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) were treated with different concentrations of ozone (T1 = 1.0 µmol mol-1 (±0.2), T2 = 1.5 µmol mol-1 (±0.2), T3 = 2.0 µmol mol-1 (±0.2)), and for the control (C) filtered air was supplied. Regeneration of shoots was obtained by culturing ozone-treated calli on MS medium supplemented with 5.57 µM of kinetin (KIN) and 1.30 µM of gibberellic acid (GA3). The frequency of regeneration of shoots from the callus was T1 = 60%, T2 = 49%, T3 = 32%, but for the control 81% regeneration was obtained. Regenerated shoots were rooted in half-strength MS medium containing 4.92 µM of indole-3 butyric acid (IBA) and successfully acclimatised. The seedlings regenerated from ozone treated calli are referred to as T1, T2 and T3 seedlings and the seedlings regenerated from filtered air-treated callus are referred to as control seedlings. T1 seedlings hold remarkably more total soluble phenol content than T2 and T3 compared to the control seedlings. T1 seedlings developed more resistance to withstand acute ozone exposure by increased phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity and possessed more chlorophyll pigments and decreased H2O2 content relative to T2 and T3 seedlings compared to control seedlings.

Effect of Ozone on Induction of Resistance in Rhinacanthus nasutus (L.) Kurz. against Acute Ozone Exposure

Studies were undertaken for induction of resistance against acute ozone exposure in Rhinacanthus nasutus (L.) Kurz. plants using ozone. Callus induced from Rhinacanthus nasutus leaf explants on Murashige & Skoog's (MS) medium supplemented with 3.40 µM of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) were treated with different concentrations of ozone (T1 = 1.0 µmol mol-1 (±0.2), T2 = 1.5 µmol mol-1 (±0.2), T3 = 2.0 µmol mol-1 (±0.2)), and for the control (C) filtered air was supplied. Regeneration of shoots was obtained by culturing ozone-treated calli on MS medium supplemented with 5.57 µM of kinetin (KIN) and 1.30 µM of gibberellic acid (GA3). The frequency of regeneration of shoots from the callus was T1 = 60%, T2 = 49%, T3 = 32%, but for the control 81% regeneration was obtained. Regenerated shoots were rooted in half-strength MS medium containing 4.92 µM of indole-3 butyric acid (IBA) and successfully acclimatised. The seedlings regenerated from ozone treated calli are referred to as T1, T2 and T3 seedlings and the seedlings regenerated from filtered air-treated callus are referred to as control seedlings. T1 seedlings hold remarkably more total soluble phenol content than T2 and T3 compared to the control seedlings. T1 seedlings developed more resistance to withstand acute ozone exposure by increased phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity and possessed more chlorophyll pigments and decreased H2O2 content relative to T2 and T3 seedlings compared to control seedlings.

___

  • Alonso R, Elvira S, Castillo FJ & Gimeno BS (2001). Interactive effects of ozone and drought stress on pigments and activities of antioxidative enzymes in Pinus halepensis. Plant Cell Environ 24: 905-916.
  • Ashmore MR & Bell JNB (1991). The role of ozone in global change. Ann Bot 67: 39-48.
  • Bahl A, Loitsch SM & Kahl G (1995). Transcriptional activation of plant defense genes by short term air pollutant stress. Environ Pollut 89: 221-227.
  • Bolewell GP (1996). The origin of oxidative burst in plants. Biochem Soc Trans 24: 38-442.
  • Boudet AM, LaPierree C & Grima-Pettenati J (1995). Biochemistry and molecular biology of lignification. New Phytol 129: 203-236.
  • Chameides WL, Kasibhatla PS, Yienger J & Levy II H (1994). Growth of continental-scale metro-agro-plexes, regional ozone pollution and world food production. Science 264: 74-77.
  • Chappelka AH & Samuelson LJ (1998). Ambient ozone effects on forest trees of the Eastern United States: a review. New Phytol 139: 91- 108.
  • Creissen G, Firmin J, Fryer M, Kular B, Leyland N, Reynolds H, Pastori G, Wellburn F, Baker N & Wellburn A (1999). Elevated glutathione biosynthetic capacity in the chloroplasts of transgenic tobacco plants paradoxically causes increased oxidative stress. Plant Cell 11: 1277-1292.
  • Davison AW & Reiling K (1995). A rapid change in ozone resistance of Plantago major after summers with high ozone concentrations. New Phytol 131: 337-344.
  • Dickerson DP, Pascholati SF, Hagerman AE, Butler LG & Nicholson RL (1984). Phenylalanine amonia-lyase and hydroxy cinnamate: CoA ligase in maize mesocotyls inoculated with Helminthosporium maydis or Helminthosporium carbonum. Physiol Plant Pathol 25: 111-123.
  • Eckey-Kaltenbach H, Ernst D, Heller W & Sandermann H (1994). Biochemical plant responses to ozone. IV. Cross-induction of defensive pathways in parsley (Petroselinum crispum L.) plants. Plant Physiol 104: 67-74.
  • Hahlbrock K & Scheel D (1989). Physiology and molecular biology of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40: 347-369.
  • Hales JM (2003). NARSTO fine-particle and ozone assessments. Environ Pollut 123: 393-397.
  • Heagle AS, Miller JE & Booker FL (1998). Influence of ozone stress on soybean responses to carbon dioxide enrichment: I. Foliar properties. Crop Sci 38: 113-121.
  • Heagle AS, Philbeck RB, Ferrell RE & Heck WW (1989). Design and performance of a large, field exposure chamber to measure effects of air quality on plants. J Environ Qual 18: 361-368.
  • Heggestad HE (1991). Origin of Bel-W3, Bel-C and Bel-B tobacco varieties and their use as indicators of ozone. Environ Pollut 74: 264-291.
  • Inclán R, Alonso R, Pujadas M, Teres J & Gimeno BS (1998). Ozone and drought stress: interactive effects on gas exchange in Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill). Chemosphere 36: 685-690.
  • Kangasjärvi J, Talvinen J, Utriainen M & Karjalainen R (1994). Plant defense systems induced by ozone. Plant Cell Environ 17: 783- 794.
  • Koukol J & Conn EE (1961). The metabolism of aromatic compounds in higher plants. J Biol Chem 236: 2692-2697.
  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15: 473- 493.
  • Panda N & Khush GS (1995). Host Plant Resistance to Insects, CAB International and International Rice Research Institute. Philippines.
  • Pascholati SF, Nicholson RL & Butler LG (1986). Phenyalanine ammonia-lyase activity and anthocyanin accumulation in wounded maize mesocotyls. J Phytopathol 115: 165-172.
  • Punturee K, Wild CP & Vinitketkumneun U (2004). Thai medicinal plants modulate nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor-α in J774.2 mouse macrophages. J Ethnopharmacol 95: 183-189.
  • Ramanathan A, Samiyappan R & Vidyasekaran P (2000). Induction of defence mechanisms in greengram leaves and suspension cultured cells by Macrophomina phaseolina and its elicitors. J Plant Dis Prot 107: 245-257.
  • Rhodes JM & Wooltorton LSC (1978). The biosynthesis of phenolic compounds in wounded plant storage tissues. In: Kahl G, ed. Biochemistry of Wounded Plant Tissues, pp. 243- 286. W de Gruyter, Berlin.
  • Rohde RA (1972). Expression of resistance in plants to nematodes. Ann Rev Phytopathol 10: 233-252.
  • Sandermann Jr H (1996). Ozone and plant health. Annu Rev Phytopathol 34: 347-366.
  • Sandermann Jr H, Ernst D, Heller W & Langebartels C (1998). Ozone: an abiotic elictor of plant defence reactions. Trends Plant Sci 3: 47-50.
  • Sattar MA, Abdullah NA, Hyekhan A & Noor AM (2004). Evaluation of antifungal and antibacterial activity of Rhinacanthus nasutus. J Biol Sci 4: 498-500.
  • Schenone G, Botteschi G, Fumagalli I & Montinaro F (1992). Effects of ambient air pollution in open-top chambers on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) its effects on growth and yield. New Phytol 122: 689- 697.
  • Schraudner M, Langebartels C & Sandermann Jr H (1996). Plant defence systems and ozone. Biochem Soc Trans 24: 456-462.
  • Sendl A, Chen JL, Jolad SD, Stoddart C, Rozhon E, Kernan M, Nanakorn W & Balick M (1996). Two naphthoquinones with anti-viral activity from Rhinacanthus nasutus. J Nat Prod 59: 808-811.
  • Sgarbi E, Fornasiero RB, Lins AP & Bonatti PM (2003). Phenol metabolism is differentially affected by ozone in two cell lines from grape (Vitis vinifera L.) leaf. Plant Sci 165: 951-957.
  • Skärby L, Wallin G, Selldén G, Karlsson PE, Ottosson S, Sutinen S & Grennfelt P (1995). Trophospheric ozone—a stress factor for Norway spruce in Sweden. Ecological Bulletins 44: 133-146.
  • Swain T & Hillis WE (1959). The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica I. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J Sci Food Agric 10: 63-68.
  • Tingey DT, Fites RC & Wickliff C (1975). Activity changes in selected enzymes from soybean leaves following ozone exposure. Physiol Plant 33: 316-320.
  • Tuomainen J, Pellinen R, Roy S, Kiiskinen M, Eloranta T, Karjalainen R & Kangasjarvi J (1996). Ozone affects birch (Betula pendula Roth) phenylpropanoid, polyamine and active oxygen detoxifying pathways at biochemical and gene expression level. J Plant Physiol 148: 179-188.
  • Wallin G, Skärby L & Selldén G (1990). Long-term exposure of Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst., to ozone in open-top chambers, its effects on the capacity of net photosynthesis, dark respiration and leaf conductance of shoots of different ages. New Phytol 115: 335-344.
  • Wellburn AR & Chitenthaler L (1984). Formulae and program to determine total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents, In: Sybesma C (ed.) Advances in Photosynthesis Research, 2: 9-12.
  • Zobel A, Bialonska D, Turnau K, Banas′ P & March R (2003). Phenolic compounds, glutathione as the master antioxidant, and ion accumulation in medicinal plants growing and altering allelopathy in polluted areas. Acta Physiol Plant 3: 14.