Assessment of genetic relationships among Secale taxa by using ISSR and IRAP markers and the chromosomal distribution of the AAC microsatellite sequence

Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP) techniques were used to investigate the genetic diversity among species of the genus Secale L. Chromosomal distribution of the AAC simple sequence repeat was examined by means of the fluorescent in situ hybridization technique. Comparative analysis revealed differences in the distribution of analyzed sequences in the genomes of Secale species. Using ISSR and IRAP data, a similarity matrix was constructed based on Dice’s coefficient, and the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean clustering was used to create dendrograms. Secale sylvestre Host and Secale strictum C.Presl were separated from a cluster consisting of the rest of the Secale taxa. The similarity for Secale sylvestre and Secale strictum reached over 85%. For Secale strictum subsp. africanum (Stapf) K.Hammer and Secale strictum subsp. kuprijanovii (Stapf) K.Hammer, which were clustered together, the similarity reached a value of 75%. The remaining taxa formed a large cluster, in which the highest value of similarity was assigned to Secale cereale L. and the Secale vavilovii Grossh. 121 inbred line (80%). The distribution patterns of the AAC repeat in chromosomes support these results. The pattern found in Secale vavilovii resembles that of Secale cereale and its subspecies. The most unique pattern of AAC distribution was observed in Secale sylvestre.

Assessment of genetic relationships among Secale taxa by using ISSR and IRAP markers and the chromosomal distribution of the AAC microsatellite sequence

Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP) techniques were used to investigate the genetic diversity among species of the genus Secale L. Chromosomal distribution of the AAC simple sequence repeat was examined by means of the fluorescent in situ hybridization technique. Comparative analysis revealed differences in the distribution of analyzed sequences in the genomes of Secale species. Using ISSR and IRAP data, a similarity matrix was constructed based on Dice’s coefficient, and the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean clustering was used to create dendrograms. Secale sylvestre Host and Secale strictum C.Presl were separated from a cluster consisting of the rest of the Secale taxa. The similarity for Secale sylvestre and Secale strictum reached over 85%. For Secale strictum subsp. africanum (Stapf) K.Hammer and Secale strictum subsp. kuprijanovii (Stapf) K.Hammer, which were clustered together, the similarity reached a value of 75%. The remaining taxa formed a large cluster, in which the highest value of similarity was assigned to Secale cereale L. and the Secale vavilovii Grossh. 121 inbred line (80%). The distribution patterns of the AAC repeat in chromosomes support these results. The pattern found in Secale vavilovii resembles that of Secale cereale and its subspecies. The most unique pattern of AAC distribution was observed in Secale sylvestre.

___

  • Achrem M & Rogalska SM (2006). Localization specific nucleotide sequences of DNA on rye chromosomes by FISH. Agricultura 247: 7–14.
  • Achrem M, Rogalska SM & Kalinka A (2010). Possible ancient origin of heterochromatic JNK sequences in chromosome 2R of Secale vavilovii Grossh. Journal of Applied Genetics 51: 1–8.
  • Akkaya MS, Bhagwat AA & Cregan PB (1992). Length polymorphism of simple sequence repeat DNA in soybean. Genetics 132: 131– 1
  • Alavi-Kia SS, Mohammadi SA, Aharizad S & Moghaddam M (2008). Analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in Crocus genus of Iran using inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 22: 795–800.
  • Barakat, A, Carels N & Bernardi G (1997). The distribution conservation of PCR amplifiability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 1151–1154.
  • Branco CJS, Vieira EA, Malone G, Kopp MM, Malone E, Bernardes A, Mistura CC, Carvalho FIF & Oliveira CA (2007). IRAP and REMAP assessments of genetic similarity in rice. Journal of Applied Genetics 48: 107–113.
  • Camacho MV, Matos M, Gonzales C, Perez-Flores V, Pernauta B, Pinto-Carnida O & Benito C (2005). Secale cereale intermicrosatellites (SCIMs): chromosomal location and genetic inheritance. Genetica 123: 303–311.
  • Chikmawati T, Skovmand B & Gustafson JP (2005). Phylogenetic relationships among Secale species revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Genome 48: 792–801.
  • Condit R & Hubbell SP (1991). Abundance and DNA sequence of two base repeat regions in tropical tree genomes. Genome 34: 66–
  • Cuadrado A & Jouve N (2002). Evolutionary trends of different repetitive DNA sequences during speciation in the genus Secale. Journal of Heredity 93: 339–345.
  • Cuadrado A & Schwarzacher T (1998). The chromosomal organization of simple sequence repeats in wheat and rye genomes. Chromosoma 107: 587–594.
  • Cuadrado A, Schwarzacher T & Jouve N (2000). Identification of different chromatin classes in wheat using in situ hybridization with simple sequence repeat oligonucleotides. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 711–717.
  • De Bustos A & Jouve N (2002). Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Secale based on the characterisation of rDNA ITS sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 235: 147–154.
  • Doğan B, Ünal M, Özgökçe F, Martin E & Kaya A (2011). Phylogenetic relationships between Malcolmia, Strigosella, Zuvanda, and some closely related genera (Brassicaceae) from Turkey revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat amplification. Turkish Journal of Botany 35: 17–23.
  • Flavell RB, Rimpau J & Smith DB (1977). Repeated sequences DNA relationships in four cereal genomes. Chromosoma 63: 205– 2
  • Frederiksen S & Petersen G (1998). A taxonomic revision of Secale (Tritceae, Poaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 18: 399–420.
  • Guo D, Zhang H & Luo Z (2006). Genetic relationships of Diospyros kaki Thunb. and related species revealed by IRAP and REMAP analysis. Plant Science 170: 528–533.
  • Gupta PK & Varshney RK (2000). The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica 113: 163–185.
  • Hammer K (1990) Breeding system and phylogenetic relationships in Secale. Biologisches Zentralblatt 109: 45–50.
  • Hancock JM (1995). The contribution of slippage-like processes to genome evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 41: 1038– 10
  • Kalendar R, Grob T, Regina M, Suoniemi A & Schulman I (1999). IRAP and REMAP: two new retrotransposon-based DNA fingerprinting techniques. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 704–711.
  • Kalendar R, Lee D & Schulman AH (2009). FastPCR software for PCR primer and probe design and repeat search. Genes, Genomes and Genomics 3: 1–14.
  • Khush GS & Stebbins GL (1961). Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies in Secale, I. Some new data on the ancestry of S. cereale. American Journal of Botany 48: 723–730.
  • Liu ZW, Biyashev RM & Saghai Maroof MA (1996). Development of simple sequence repeat DNA makers and their integration into a barley linkage map. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93: 869–876.
  • Milbourne, D, Meyer R, Bradshaw JE, Baird E, Bonar N, Provan J, Powell W & Waugh R (1997). Comparison of PCR based marker systems for the analysis of genetic relationships in cultivated potato. Molecular Breeding 3: 127–136.
  • Milbourne D, Meyer R, Collins AJ, Ramsay LD, Gebhardt C & Waugh R (1998). Isolation, characterisation and mapping of simple sequence repeat loci in potato. Molecular and General Genetics 259: 233–245.
  • Murai, K, Naiyu XU & Tsunewaki K (1989). Studies on the origin of crop species by restriction endonuclease analysis of organellar DNA. III. Chloroplast DNA variation and interspecific relationships in the genus Secale. Japanese Journal of Genetics 64: 35–47.
  • Murray M & Thompson WF (1980). Rapid isolation of molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 8: 4321–4325.
  • Page RDM (1996). TreeView: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in Biosciences 12: 357–358.
  • Pavlícek A, Hrdá Š & Flegr J (1999). Free-Tree -- freeware program for construction of phylogenetic trees on the basis of distance data and for bootstrap/jackknife analysis of the trees robustness. Application in the RAPD analysis of genus Frenkelia. Folia Biologica (Praha) 45: 97–99.
  • Pearce SR, Pich U, Harrison G, Flavell AJ, Heslop-Harrison JS, Schubert I & Kumar A (1996). The Ty1-copia group retrotransposons of Allium cepa are distributed throughout the chromosomes but are enriched in the terminal heterochromatin. Chromosome Research 4: 357–364.
  • Petersen G & Doebley JF (1993). Chloroplast DNA variation in the genus Secale (Poaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 187: 115–125.
  • Ren TH, Chen F, Zou YT, Jia YH, Zhang HQ, Yan BJ & Ren ZL (2011). Evolutionary trends of microsatellites during the speciation process and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Secale. Genome 54: 316–326.
  • Rogalska SM, Cybulska-Augustyniak J, Mroczyk W, Cierniewska A & Obuchowski W (1993). Investigations of contents of proteins and pentosans in kernels of rye Secale vavilovii Grossh. Bulletin IHAR 187: 93–98.
  • Schmidt T & Heslop-Harrison JS (1996). The physical and genomic organization of microsatellites in sugar beet. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 8761–8765.
  • Schulman AH, Flavell AJ & Ellis TH (2004). The application of LTR retrotransposons as molecular markers in plants. Methods in Molecular Biology 260: 145–173.
  • Shang HY, Wei YM, Wang XR & Zheng YL (2006). Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in the rye genus Secale L. (rye) based on Secale cereale microsatellite markers. Genetics and Molecular Biology 29: 685–691.
  • Singh RJ & Röbbelen G (1977). Identification by Giemsa technique of the translocations separating cultivated rye from three wild species of Secale. Chromosoma 59: 217–229.
  • Smith DB, Flavell RB (1977). Nucleotide sequence organisation in the rye genome. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 474: 82–97.
  • Smykal P (2006). Development of an efficient retrotransposon-based fingerprinting method for rapid pea variety identification. Journal of Applied Genetics 47: 221–230.
  • Stutz HC (1972). On the origin of cultivated rye. American Journal of Botany 59: 59–70.
  • Teo CH, Tan SH, Othman YR & Schwarzacher T (2002). The cloning of Ty1-copia-like retrotransposons from 10 varieties of banana (Musa sp.). The Journal of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics 6: 193–201.
  • Tóth G, Gaspari Z & Jurka J (2000). Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: survey and analysis. Genome Research 10: 967–981.
  • Vicient CM, Jaaskelainen MJ, Kalendar R, Schulman AH (2001). Active retrotransposons are a common feature of grass genomes. Plant Physiology 125: 1283–1292.
  • Vicient CM, Kalendar R, Anamthawat-Jónsson K & Schulman AH (1999). Structure, functionality, and evolution of the BARE-1 retrotransposon of barley. Genetica 107: 53–63.
  • Zhang L, Huang YP, Miao XX, Qian M & Lu C (2005). Microsatellite markers application on domesticated silkworm and wild silkworm. Insect Science 12: 413–419.
  • Zhao X & Kochert G (1992). Characterization and genetic mapping of a short, highly repeated, interspersed DNA sequence from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Molecular and General Genetics 231: 353–359.
  • Zhou JP, Yang ZJ, Li GR, Liu C, Tang ZX, Zhang Y & Ren ZL (2010). Diversified chromosomal distribution of tandemly repeated sequences revealed evolutionary trends in Secale (Poaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 287: 49–56.
  • Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A & Labuda D (1994). Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176–183.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Contrasting inbreeding depression in early and late stages of the life cycle of a Mediterranean shrub, Anagyris foetida (Leguminosae)

Francisco Javier VALTUEÑA, Josefa LÓPEZ, Ana ORTEGA-OLIVENCIA

Onopordum hasankeyfense (Asteraceae), a new species from south-eastern Turkey

Süleyman Mesut PINAR, Lütfi BEHÇET

Physiological responses of transgenic tobacco plants expressing the dehydration-responsive RD22 gene of Vitis vinifera to salt stress

Rahma Jardak JAMOUSSI, Mohamed Malek ELABBASSI, Hatem Ben JOUIRA

Lichenized and lichenicolous fungi of Gevne Valley (Konya, Antalya)

Mustafa KOCAKAYA, Mehmet Gökhan HALICI, Ahmet AKSOY

Growth response and soil-plant water relations of 4 dominant psammophyte species with soil moisture in central Inner Mongolia

Yuanrun ZHENG, Lianhe JIANG, Yong GAO, Xi CHEN, Geping LUO, Xianwei FENG, Hideyuki SHIMIZU

Ecology and allelopathic control of Brassica tournefortii in reclaimed areas of the Nile Delta, Egypt

Ahmed Mohamed ABD EL-GAWAD

Contributions to the macrofungal diversity of Antalya Province

Mehmet Halil SOLAK, Hakan ALLI, Mustafa IŞILOĞLU, Halil GÜNGÖR, Erbil KALMIŞ

Melatonin and other factors that promote rooting and sprouting of shoot cuttings in Punica granatum cv. Wonderful

Eirini SARROU, İoannis THERIOS, Kortessa DIMASSI-THERIOU

Study on seed morphometry of some threatened Western Himalayan orchids

Jagdeep VERMA, Kusum SHARMA, Kranti THAKUR, Jaspreet Kaur SEMBI, Suraj Prakash VIJ

Testing the utility of matK and ITS DNA regions for discrimination of Allium species

Meryem İPEK, Ahmet İPEK, Philipp W. SIMON