___

• Babitha M, Vasantha RP, Reddy PV (2006). Genetic studies on leaf chlorophyll content in groundnut, A. hypogaea L. in terms of SPAD chlorophyll meter reading. J Oilseeds Res 23: 247–251.
• Bindu Madhava H, Sheshshayee MS, Shankar AG, Prasad TG, Udayakumar M (2003). Use of SPAD chlorophyll meter to assess transpiration efficiency of peanut. In: Cruickshank AW, Rachaputi NC, Wright GC, Nigam SN, editors. Breeding of Drought Resistant Peanuts. ACIAR Proceedings No. 112. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, pp. 3–9.
• Bruschi P, Vendramin GG, Bussotti F, Grossoni P (2003). Morphological and molecular diversity among Italian populations of Quercus petraea (Fagaceae). Ann Bot 91: 707– 7
• Burow MD, Simpson CE, Paterson AH, Starr JL (1996). Identification of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) RAPD markers diagnostic of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) Chitwood) resistance. Mol Breeding 2: 369–379.
• Burow MD, Simpson CE, Starr JL, Paterson AH (2001). Transmission genetics of chromatin from a synthetic amphidiploid to cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): broadening the gene pool of a monophyletic polyploid species. Genetics 159: 823– 8
• Burow MD, Starr JL, Park CH, Simpson CE, Paterson AH (2008). Identification of QTLs for resistance to early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola S. Hori) in an introgression population of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). In: Proceedings of the 16th Plant and Animal Genome Conference, 12–16 January, San Diego, CA, USA.
• Chunilal, Hariprasanna K, Rathnakumar AL, Samdur MY, Gor HK, Chikani BM (2006). High yielding water-use efficient Spanish groundnut genotypes for rainfed production system. Indian J Agri Sci 76: 148–150.
• Coffelt TA (1989). Peanut. In: Robbelen G, Downey RK, Ashri A, editors. Oil Crops of the World - Their Breeding and Utilization. New York NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, pp. 319–338.
• Collard BCY, Jahufer MZZ, Brouwer JB, Pang ECK (2005). An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: the basic concepts. Euphytica 142: 169–196.
• Comstock RE, Moll RH (1963). Genotype × environment interactions. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF, editors. Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy of sciences, pp 164–196.
• Cooke RJ (1995). Gel electrophoresis for the identification of plant varieties. J Chromatogr 698: 281–291.
• Cuc LM, Mace ES, Crouch JH, Quang VD, Long TD, Varshney RK (2008). Isolation and characterisation of novel microsatellite markers and their application for diversity assessment in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). BMC Plant Biol 8: Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6: 36–40.
• FAOSTAT (2010). Statistics. Rome, Italy: FAO. Available at http:// faostat.fao.org/site/291/default.aspx.
• Ferguson ME, Bramel PJ, Chandra S (2004a). Gene diversity among botanical varieties in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop Sci 44: 1847–1854.
• Ferguson M, Burow M, Schulze S, Bramel P, Paterson A, Kresovich S, Mitchell S (2004b). Microsatellite identification and characterization in peanut (A. hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet 108: 1064–1070.
• Fernie A, Tanmor Y, Zamir D (2006). Natural genetic variation for improving crop quality. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9: 196–202.
• Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agri Res 14: 742–754.
• Fu Q, Zhang P, Tan L, Zhu Z, Ma D, Fu Y, Zhan X, Cai H, Sun C (2010). Analysis of QTLs for yield-related traits in Yuanjiang common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). J Genet Genomics 37: 147–157.
• Garcia GM, Stalker HT, Schroeder E, Lyrely JH, Kochert G (1996). Identification of RAPD, SCAR, and RFLP markers tightly linked to nematode resistance genes introgressed from Arachis cardenasii into Arachis hypogaea. Genome 39: 836–845.
• Garcia GM, Stalker HT, Schroeder E, Lyrely JH, Kochert G (2005). A RAPD-based linkage map of peanut based on a backcross population between the two diploid species Arachis stenosperma and A. cardenasii. Peanut Sci 32: 1–8.
• Gautami B, Pandey MK, Vadez V, Nigam SN, Ratnakumar P, Krishnamurthy L, Radhakrishnan T, Gowda MVC, Narasu ML, Hoisington DA et al. (2011). Quantitative trait locus analysis and construction of consensus genetic map for drought tolerance traits based on three recombinant inbred line populations in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Mol Breeding 30: 757–772.
• Gimenes MA, Hoshino AA, Barbosa AVG, Palmieri DA, Lopes CR (2007). Characterization and transferability of microsatellite markers of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea). BMC Plant Biol 7: 9.
• Gimenes MA, Lopes CR, Valls JFM (2002). Genetic relationships among Arachis species based on AFLP. Genet Mol Biol 25: 349–353.
• Gower JC (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27: 857–74.
• Halward TM, Stalker HT, Kochert G (1993). Development of an RFLP linkage map in diploid peanut species. Theor Appl Genet 87: 379–384.
• Halward T, Stalker HT, Larue E, Kochert G (1992). Use of single primer DNA amplification in the genetic studies of peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Plant Mol Biol 18: 315–325.
• Halward TM, Stalker HT, Larue EA, Kochert G (1991). Genetic variation detectable with molecular markers among unadapted germplasm resources of cultivated peanut and related wild species. Genome 34: 1013–1020.
• Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 9.
• He G, Meng R, Gao H, Guo B, Gao G, Newman M, Pittman RN, Prakash CS (2005). Simple sequence repeat markers for botanical varieties of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 142: 131–136.
• Herselman L (2003). Genetic variation among Southern African cultivated peanut (A. hypogaea L.) genotypes as revealed by AFLP analysis. Euphytica 133: 319–327.
• Hong B, Chen XP, Liang XO, Liu HY, Zhou GY, Li SX, Wen SJ, Holbrook CC, Guo BZ (2010). A SSR-based composite genetic linkage map of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genome. BMC Plant Biol 10: 7.
• Hopkins MS, Casa AM, Wang T, Mitchell SE, Dean RE, Kochert GD, Kresovich S (1999). Discovery and characterization of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in peanut. Crop Sci 39: 1243–1247.
• ICRISAT (2012). Groundnut. Patancheru, India: International Crop Research for Semi-Arid Tropics. Available at www.icrisat.org/ crop-groundnut-genebank.htm.
• Johnson HW, Robinson HP, Comstoc RE (1955). Estimation of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J 47: 314–318.
• Khedikar YP, Gowda MVC, Sarvamangala C, Patgar KV, Upadhyaya HD, Varshney RK (2010). A QTL study on late leaf spot and rust revealed one major QTL for molecular breeding for rust resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet 121: 971–984.
• Kochert G, Halward T, Branch WD, Simpson CE (1991). RFLP variability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars and wild species. Theor Appl Genet 81: 565–570.
• Kottapalli KR, Burow MD, Burow G, Burke J, Puppala N (2007). Molecular characterization of the U.S. Peanut Mini Core Collection using microsatellite markers. Crop Sci 47: 1718– 17
• Krishna GK, Zhang J, Burow M, Pittman RN, Delikostadinov SG, Lu Y, Puppala N (2004). Genetic diversity analysis in Valencia peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using microsatellites. Cell Mol Biol Lett 9: 685–697.
• Liang X, Chen X, Hong Y, Liu H, Zhou G, Li S, Guo B (2009). Utility of EST-derived SSR in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and Arachis wild species. BMC Plant Biol 9: 35.
• Lush JL (1949). Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animals. Hereditas 35: 356–375.
• Mace ES, Phong DT, Upadhyaya HD, Chandra S, Crouch JH (2006). SSR analysis of cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm resistant to rust and late leaf spot diseases. Euphytica 152: 317–330.
• Mace ES, Varshney RK, Mahalakshmi V, Seetha K, Gafoor A, Leeladevi Y, Crouch JH (2007). In silico development of simple sequence repeat markers within the aeschynomenoid/ dalbergoid and genistoid clades of the Leguminosae family and their transferability to Arachis hypogaea, groundnut. Plant Sci 174: 51–60.
• Mace ES, Yuejin W, Boshou L, Upadhyaya H, Chandra S, Crouch JH (2003). Simple sequence repeat (SSR)-based diversity analysis of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm resistant to bacterial wilt. Plant Genetic Resources 5: 27–36.
• Mallikarjuna N (2004). Meiotic study of intersectional hybrids between Arachis hypogaea, A. duranensis and A. diogoi with A. glabrata. Int Arachis Newslett 24: 7–8.
• Mallikarjuna N (2002). Gene introgression from Arachis glabrata into A. hypogaea, A. duranensis and A. diogoi. Euphytica 124: 99–105.
• Mallikarjuna N, Sastri DC (2002). Morphological, cytological and disease resistance studies of the intersectional hybrid between Arachis hypogaea L. and A. glabrata Benth. Euphytica 126: 161–167.
• Mohan M, Nair S, Bhagwat A, Krishna TG, Yano M, Bhatia CR, Sasaki T (1997). Genome mapping, molecular markers and marker-assisted selection in crop plants. Mol Breed 3: 87–103.
• Mondal S, Badigannavar AM (2010). Molecular diversity and association SSR markers to rust and late leaf spot diseases in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Breed 129: 68–
• Mondal S, Badigannavar AM, D’Souza SF (2012). Development of genic molecular markers linked to a rust resistance gene in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 188: 163–173.
• Mondal S, Badigannavar AM, Murthy GSS (2007). RAPD markers linked to a rust resistance gene in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). Euphytica 159: 233–239.
• Mondal S, Ghosh S, Badigannavar AM (2005). RAPD polymorphism among groundnut genotypes differing in disease reaction to late leaf spot and rust. Int Arachis Newslett 25: 25–30.
• Moretzsohn MC, Barbosa AVG, Alves DMT, Teixeira C, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Guimarães PM, Pereira RW, Lopes CR, Cavallari MM, Valls JFM et al. (2009). A linkage map for the B-genome of Arachis (Fabaceae) and its synteny to the A-genome. BMC Plant Biol 9: 40.
• Moretzsohn MC, Gouvea EG, Inglis PW, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Valls JFM, Bertioli DJ (2013). A study of the relationships of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and its most closely related wild species using intron sequences and microsatellite markers. Annals of Botany 111: 113–126.
• Moretzsohn MC, Leoi L, Proite K, Guimarães PM, Leal-Bertioli SC, Gimenes MA, Martins MA, Valls JFM, Grattapaglia D, Bertioli DJ (2005). A microsatellite-based, gene-rich linkage map for the A-genome of Arachis (Fabaceae). Theor Appl Genet 111: 1060–1071.
• Mukherjee A, Sikdar B, Ghosh B, Banerjee A, Ghosh E, Bhattacharya M, Roy SC (2013). RAPD and ISSR analysis of some economically important species, varieties, and cultivars of the genus Allium (Alliaceae). Turk J Bot 37: 605–618
• Muthiah JVL, Shunmugiah KP, Manikandan R (2013). Genetic fidelity assessment of encapsulated in vitro tissues of Bacopa monnieri after 6 months of storage by using ISSR and RAPD markers. Turk J Bot 37: 1008–1017.
• Nageswara Rao RC, Talwar HS, Wright GC (2001). Rapid assessment of specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen in peanut (A. hypogaea L.) using a chlorophyll meter. J Agron Crop Sci 186: 175–182.
• Nageswara Rao RC, Udaykumar M, Farquhar GD, Talwarand HS, Prasad TG (1995). Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and its relationship to specific leaf area and ribulose-1,5bisphosphate carboxylase content in groundnut genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol 22: 545–551.
• Nageswara Rao RC, Williams JH, Singh M (1989). Genotypic sensitivity to drought yield potential of peanut Agron J 81: 887–893.
• Nautiyal PC, Nageswara Rao R, Joshi YC (2002). Moisture-deficitinduced changes in leaf-water content, leaf carbon exchange rate and biomass production in groundnut cultivars differing in specific leaf area. Field Crop Res 74: 67–79.
• Nautiyal PC, Rajgopal K, Zala PV, Pujari DS, Basu M, Dhadhal BA, Nandre BM (2008). Evaluation of wild Arachis species for abiotic stress tolerance: I. Thermal stress and leaf water relations. Euphytica 159: 43–57.
• Nei M (1973). Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 3321–3323.
• Nevo E, Chen G (2010). Drought and salt tolerances in wild relatives for wheat and barley improvement. Plant Cell Environ 33: 670–685.
• Nigam SN, Aruna R (2008). Stability of soil plant analytical development (SPAD) chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR) and specific leaf area (SLA) and their association across varying soil moisture stress conditions in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). Euphytica 160: 111–117.
• Nigam SN, Chandra S, Rupa Sridevi K, Manoha Bhukta A, Reddy GS, Nageswara Rao RC, Wright GC, Reddy PV, Deshmukh MP, Mathur RK et al. (2005). Efficiency of physiological trait-based and empirical selection approaches for drought tolerance in groundnut. Ann Appl Biol 146: 433–439.
• Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006). GENALEX 6: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288–295.
• Powell W, Machray GC, Provan J (1996). Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci 1: 215–222.
• Qin H, Feng S, Chen C, Guo Y, Knapp S, Culbreath A, He G, Wang ML, Zhang X, Holbrook CC et al. (2012). An integrated genetic linkage map of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) constructed from two RIL populations. Theor Appl Genet 124: 653–664.
• Raina SN, Rani V, Kojima T, Ogihara Y, Singh KP, Devarumath RM (2001). RAPD and ISSR fingerprints as useful genetic markers for analysis of genetic diversity, varietal identification, and phylogenetic relationships in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars and wild species. Genome 44: 763–772.
• Ravi K, Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L, Nigam SN, Isobe S, Knapp SJ, Jayakumar T, He GH, Bertioli DJ, Hoisington DA et al. (2010). A comprehensive QTL analysis based on different programmes indicates involvement of several small-effect main and epistatic QTL for drought tolerance in groundnut. In: National Symposium on Genomics and Crop Improvement: Relevance and Reservations, 25–27 February, ANGRAU, Hyderabad, India.
• Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984). Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 8014–8018.
• Samizadeh H, Yazdi-Samadi B, Ghannadha MR, Malbobi MA, Taleei AR, Ricestingam G (2003). A study of molecular marker associated with pod length trait in canola (B. napus) double haploid population. Iran J Agric Sci 34: 871–879.
• Selvaraj MG, Narayana M, Schubert AM, Ayers JL, Baring MR, Burow MD (2009). Identification of QTLs for pod and kernel traits in cultivated peanut by bulked segregant analysis. Electron J Biotechn 12: 3–4.
• Sharma KK, Lavanya M (2002). Recent developments in transgenics for abiotic stress in legumes of the semi-arid tropics. In: Ivanaga M, editor. Genetic Engineering of Crop Plants for Abiotic Stress. JIRCAS Working Report No. 23. Tsukuba, Japan: JIRCAS, pp. 61–73.
• Shirasawa K, Hideki H, Satoshi T, Makoto H, Hiroyuki K, Sigeru S, Sigemi S, Akiko W, Tsunakazu F, Sachiko I (2012). Characterization of active miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in the peanut genome. Theor Appl Genet 124: 1429–1438.
• Simpson, CE, Burrow MD, Patterson AH, Starr JL, Church GT (2003). Registration of ‘NemaTAM’ peanut. Crop Sci 43: 1561.
• Singh KB, Omar M., Saxena MC, Johansen C (1997). Screening for drought resistance in spring chickpea in the Mediterranean region. J Agron Crop Sci 178: 227–235.
• Smith JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, Smith OS, Wall SJ, Senior ML, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Ziegle J (1997). An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparison of data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet 95: 163–173.
• Stalker HT, Simpson CS (1995). Germplasm resources in Arachis. In: Pattee HE, Staklker HT, editors. Advances in Peanut Science. Tifton, GA, USA: American Peanut Research and Education Society, pp. 14–53.
• Subramanian P, Gurtu S, Nageswara Rao RC, Nigam SN (2000). Identification of DNA polymorphism in cultivated groundnut using random amplified polymorphism DNA (RAPD) assay. Genome 43: 656–660.
• Sujay V, Gowda MVC, Pandey MK, Bhat RS, Khedikar YP, Nadaf HL (2012). Quantitative trait locus analysis and construction of consensus genetic map for foliar disease resistance based on two recombinant inbred line populations in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Mol Breeding 30: 773–788.
• Sun G, Bond M, Nass H, Martin R, Dong Z (2003). RAPD polymorphism in spring wheat cultivars and lines with different level of Fusarium resistance. Theor Appl Genet 106: 1059–1067.
• Tanksley S, Fulton T (2007). Dissecting quantitative trait variationexamples from the tomato. Euphytica 145: 365–370.
• Upadhyaya HD (2005). Variability for drought resistance related traits in the minicore collection of peanut. Crop Sci 45: 1432– 14
• Varshney RK, Bertioli DJ, Moretzsohn MC, Vadez V, Krishnamurty L, Aruna R, Nigam SN, Ravi K, He G, Knapp SJ et al. (2009). The first SSR based genetic linkage map for cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet 118: 729–739.
• Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME (2005). Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol 23: 48–55.
• Ward J (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 38: 236–244.
• Wright GC, Hammer GL (1994). Distribution of nitrogen and radiation use efficiency in peanut canopies. Aust J Agr Res 45: 565–574.
• Wright GC, Nageswar Rao, Basu MS (1996). A physiological approach to the understanding of genotype by environment interactions: a case study on improvement of drought adaptation in groundnut. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL, editors. Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 365–381.
• Wright GC, Nageswara Rao RC, Farquhar GD (1994). Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in peanut under water deficit conditions. Crop Sci 34: 92–97.
• Yılmaz G, Tugay ME (1999). Genotype x environment interactions in potato I. the investigation based on stability parameters. Turk J Agric For 23: 97–105.