The sensitivity of 5-formylcytosine to doxorubicin regardless of DNA damage

The sensitivity of 5-formylcytosine to doxorubicin regardless of DNA damage

We have previously shown that DNA damage induced by doxorubicin was associated with an increase in the level of DNA methylation, 5meC, in mouse embryonic fibroblasts using a developed immunostaining methodology. Doxorubicin (also known as adriamycin), which induces double-strand DNA breaks, has been widely used in cancer therapy. Cytosine modifications are dynamically regulated in the genome during lifespan, but abnormal changes in the 5meC pattern can be associated with diseases in particular cancer progressions and DNA damage. One of the side effects of cancer therapy is that chemotherapeutic agents can damage healthy cells as well as cancerous cells. In this study, we aimed to investigate (i) the effect of doxorubicin at a dose that does not induce DNA damage on cytosine modifications 5meC, 5hmC, and 5fC, and (ii) the effect of a treatment known to be nongenotoxic (room light) on 5meC, 5hmC, and 5fC. We found that 5fC is the most sensitive modification to each treatment experienced in healthy fibroblasts as its level decreased after each condition, and its decrease did not correlate to DNA damage. The results suggest preliminary information on how healthy noncancerous cells can response to chemotherapeutics in terms of cytosine modifications.

___

  • Bachman M, Uribe-Lewis S, Yang XP, Burgess HE, Iurlaro M, Reik W, Murrell A, Balasubramanian S (2015). 5-Formylcytosine can be a stable DNA modification in mammals. Nat Chem Biol 11: 555-557.
  • Bachman M, Uribe-Lewis S, Yang XP, Williams M, Murrell A, Balasubramanian S (2014). 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is a predominantly stable DNA modification. Nat Chem 6: 1049-1055.
  • Booth MJ, Marsico G, Bachman M, Beraldi D, Balasubramanian S (2014). Quantitative sequencing of 5-formylcytosine in DNA at single-base resolution. Nat Chem 6: 435-440.
  • Chen Y, Jungsuwadee P, Vore M, Butterfield DA, Clair DKS (2007). Collateral damage in cancer chemotherapy - oxidative stress in nontargeted tissues. Mol Interv 7: 147-156.
  • Christensen B, Houseman A, Marsit C, Zheng S, Wrensch M, Wiemels J, Nelson H, Karagas M, Padbury J, Raphael B et al. (2009). Aging and environmental exposures alter tissue-specific DNA methylation dependent upon CpG island context. PLoS Genet 5: e1000602.
  • Cortellino S, Xu JF, Sannai M, Moore R, Caretti E, Cigliano A, Le Coz M, Devarajan K, Wessels A, Soprano D et al. (2011). Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair. Cell 146: 67-79.
  • Çelik S, Li Y, O'Neill C (2014). The exit of mouse embryonic fibroblasts from the cell-cycle changes the nature of solvent exposure of the 5′-methylcytosine epitope within chromatin. PloS One 9: e92523.
  • Çelik S, Li Y, O'Neill C (2015). The effect of DNA damage on the pattern of immune-detectable DNA methylation in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 339: 20-34.
  • Feng J, Zhou Y, Campbell SL, Le T, Li E, Sweatt JD, Silva AJ, Fan GP (2010). Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a maintain DNA methylation and regulate synaptic function in adult forebrain neurons. Nat Neurosci 13: 423-430.
  • Globisch D, Munzel M, Muller M, Michalakis S, Wagner M, Koch S, Bruckl T, Biel M, Carell T (2010). Tissue distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and search for active demethylation intermediates. PLoS One 5: e15367.
  • Hata K, Okano M, Lei H, Li E (2002). Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development 129: 1983-1993.
  • Illingworth RS, Gruenewald-Schneider U, Webb S, Kerr ARW, James KD, Turner DJ, Smith C, Harrison DJ, Andrews R, Bird AP (2010). Orphan CpG islands identify numerous conserved promoters in the mammalian genome. PLoS Genet 6: e1001134.
  • Kinney SM, Chin HG, Vaisvila R, Bitinaite J, Zheng Y, Esteve PO, Feng SH, Stroud H, Jacobsen SE, Pradhan S (2011). Tissue-specific distribution and dynamic changes of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian genomes. J Biol Chem 286: 24685-24693.
  • Li Y, O'Neill C (2013). 5′-methylcytosine and 5′-hydroxymethylcytosine each provide epigenetic information to the mouse zygote. PloS One 8: e63689.
  • Maunakea AK, Nagarajan RP, Bilenky M, Ballinger TJ, D'Souza C, Fouse SD, Johnson BE, Hong CB, Nielsen C, Zhao YJ et al. (2010). Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature 466: 253-257.
  • Munzel M, Globisch D, Bruckl T, Wagner M, Welzmiller V, Michalakis S, Muller M, Biel M, Carell T (2010). Quantification of the sixth DNA base hydroxymethylcytosine in the brain. Angew Chem Int Edit 49: 5375-5377.
  • Oki Y, Kantarjian H, Gharibyan V, Jones D, O'brien S, Vertovsek S, Cortes J, Morris G, Garcia-Manero G, Issa J (2007). Phase II study of low-dose decitabine in combination with imatinib mesylate in patients with accelerated or myeloid blastic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Cancer 109: 899-906.
  • Ricceri F, Trevisan M, Fiano V, Grasso C, Fasanelli F, Scoccianti C, De Marco L, Tos AG, Vineis P, Sacerdote C (2014). Seasonality modifies methylation profiles in healthy people. PLoS One 9: e106846.
  • Ronn T, Volkov P, Davegardh C, Dayeh T, Hall E, Olsson AH, Nilsson E, Tornberg A, Nitert MD, Eriksson KF et al. (2013). A six months exercise intervention influences the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern in human adipose tissue. PLoS Genet 9: e1003572.
  • Santos F, Peat J, Burgess H, Rada C, Reik W, Dean W (2013). Active demethylation in mouse zygotes involves cytosine deamination and base excision repair. Epigenetics and Chromatin 6: 39.
  • Silva A, Adenot P, Daniel N, Archilla C, Peynot N, Lucci CM, Beaujean N, Duranthon V (2011). Dynamics of DNA methylation levels in maternal and paternal rabbit genomes after fertilization. Epigenetics 6: 987-993.