Genetic variability among native dog breeds in Turkey
In this study, the genetic structures and relationships of native Turkish dog breeds were investigated using 20 polymorphic loci (17 microsatellites and 3 proteins). For this aim, a total of 141 blood samples were taken from Turkish shepherd dogs and Turkish Greyhounds located in several geographical regions of Turkey. Multilocus FST values indicated that around 1.92% of the total genetic variation could be explained by breed differences and the remaining 98.08% by differences among individuals. The gene flow between populations within each generation varied between 8.4 (Akbash-White Kars Shepherd dog pairs) and 62.3 (Black-Grey Kars Shepherd dog pairs). Four different groups appeared in the 3-dimensional factorial correspondence analysis, and among these, dogs from the Akbash, Kangal, Kars Shepherd, and Turkish Greyhound breeds grouped in clearly separated clusters in distant parts of the 3-dimensional graph. These results clearly show that Akbash and Kangal Shepherd dogs are different populations with different genetic structures. Therefore, the generalised grouping of Turkish shepherd dogs into a single breed called Anatolian or Turkish shepherd dogs is incorrect.
Genetic variability among native dog breeds in Turkey
In this study, the genetic structures and relationships of native Turkish dog breeds were investigated using 20 polymorphic loci (17 microsatellites and 3 proteins). For this aim, a total of 141 blood samples were taken from Turkish shepherd dogs and Turkish Greyhounds located in several geographical regions of Turkey. Multilocus FST values indicated that around 1.92% of the total genetic variation could be explained by breed differences and the remaining 98.08% by differences among individuals. The gene flow between populations within each generation varied between 8.4 (Akbash-White Kars Shepherd dog pairs) and 62.3 (Black-Grey Kars Shepherd dog pairs). Four different groups appeared in the 3-dimensional factorial correspondence analysis, and among these, dogs from the Akbash, Kangal, Kars Shepherd, and Turkish Greyhound breeds grouped in clearly separated clusters in distant parts of the 3-dimensional graph. These results clearly show that Akbash and Kangal Shepherd dogs are different populations with different genetic structures. Therefore, the generalised grouping of Turkish shepherd dogs into a single breed called Anatolian or Turkish shepherd dogs is incorrect.
___
- Clutton-Brock J. Evolution of domesticated animals. In: Mason IL. ed. Dog. Longman; 1984: pp. 198–211.
- Zeder MA. Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean basin: origins, diffusion, and impact. P Natl Acad Sci-Biol 105: 11597–11604, 2008.
- Sablin MV, Khlopachev GA. The earliest ice age dogs: evidence from Eliseevichi I. Curr Anthropol 43: 795–799, 2002.
- Napierala H, Uerpmann HP. A ‘new’ palaeolithic dog from Central Europe. Int J Osteoarchaeol 22: 127–137, 2010.
- Fiennes R, Fiennes A. The Natural History of the Dog. Wedenfeld & Nicolson Press. London; 1968.
- Savolainen P, Zhang Y, Luo J et al. Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 298: 1610–1613, 2002. vonHoldt BM, Pollinger JP, Lohmueller KE et al. Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication. Nature 464: 898–902, 2010.
- Pang JF, Kluetsch C, Zou XJ et al. mtDNA data indicate a single origin for dogs south of Yangtze River, less than 16,300 years ago, from numerous wolves. Mol Biol Evol 26: 2849–2864, 200
- Ding ZL, Oskarsson M, Ardalan A et al. Origins of domestic dog in Southern East Asia is supported by analysis of Y-chromosome DNA. Heredity 108: 507–514, 2012.
- Ardalan A, Kluetsch CFC, Zhang A et al. Comprehensive study of mtDNA among Southwest Asian dogs contradicts independent domestication of wolf, but implies dog–wolf hybridization. Ecology and Evolution 3: 373–385, 2011.
- Kırmızı E. Türk çoban köpeklerinin tarihçesi. Türk Veteriner Hekimliği Dergisi 6: 39–41, 1994.
- Nelson DD. A general classification of the native dogs of Turkey. In: The International Symposium on Turkish Shepherd Dogs, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey; 1996: pp. 19–94.
- Özbeyaz C. Kangal köpeklerinde bazı morfolojik özellikler. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 34: 38–46, 19 Reed S. The history of Turkish shepherd dogs. In: The International Symposium on Turkish Shepherd Dogs, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey; 1996: pp. 97–109.
- Erdoğan M, Özbeyaz C. Investigation of blood protein polymorphism and estimation of genetic distances in some dog breeds in Turkey. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 28: 583–590, 2004.
- Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Press. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA; 1989.
- Nei M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press. New York; 1987.
- Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370, 1984.
- Hartl DL, Clark AG. Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates Press. Sunderland, MA, USA; 1989.
- Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L et al. GENETIX 4.00 WindowsTM Software for Population Genetics. University of Montpellier Press. Montpellier, France; 1996.
- Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945– 959, 2000.
- Altunok V, Koban E, Chikhi L et al. Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs. B Vet I Pulawy 49: 249–254, 2005. Tanabe Y, Ôta K, Ito S et al. Biochemical-genetic relationships among Asian and European dogs and the ancestry of the Japanese native dogs. J Anim Breed Genet 108: 455–478, 1991. Kobayashi R, Miyakawa H, Tanabe Y et al. Blood protein polymorphism in Bangladesh native dogs. Report of the Society for Researches on Native Livestock 12: 269–289, 1987.
- Lachmann C. Verteilung genetischer Polymorphismen bei einigen deutschen Hunderassen. PhD, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, 1993.
- Koskinen MT, Bredbacka P. Assessment of the population structure of five Finnish dog breeds with microsatellites. Anim Genet 31: 310–317, 2000.
- Altet L, Francino O, Sánchez A. Microsatellite polymorphism in closely related dogs. J Hered 92: 276–279, 2001.
- Ichikawa Y, Takagi K, Tsumagari S et al. Canine parentage testing based on microsatellite polymorphisms. J Vet Med Sci 63: 1209–1213, 2001.
- Jouquand S, Priat C, Hitte C et al. Identification and characterization of a set of 100 tri- and dinucleotide microsatellites in the canine genome. Anim Genet 31: 266– 272, 2000.
- Kim KS, Tanabe Y, Park CK et al. Genetic variability in East Asian dogs using microsatellite loci analysis. J Hered 92: 398– 403, 2001.
- Irion DN, Schaffer AL, Famula TR et al. Analysis of genetic variation in 28 dog breed populations with 100 microsatellite markers. J Hered 94: 81–87, 2003.
- Irion DN, Schaffer AL, Grant S et al. Genetic variation analysis of the Bali street dog using microsatellites. BMC Genet 6: 1–13, 200 Lupke L, Distl O. Microsatellite marker analysis of the genetic variability in Hanoverian hounds. J Anim Breed Genet 122: 131–139, 2005.
- Weir BS. Genetic Data Analysis. Sinauer Associates Press. Sunderland, MA, USA; 1996.
- Jordana J, Piedrafita J, Sánchez A. Genetic relationships in Spanish dog breeds, II. The analysis of biochemical polymorphism. Genet Sel Evol 24: 245–263, 1992.
- Trexler JC. Hierarchical organization of genetic variation in the Sailfin Molly, Poecilia latipinna (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 42: 995–1005, 1988.